Greenpeace Releases Annual Green Electronics Rankings
Written by Megan Treacy on 02/07/09   

greenpeace-guide
Greenpeace International has released its annual "Guide to Greener Electronics" where it ranks leading electronics companies on their policies towards toxic chemicals, recycling and climate change.  This year, PC makers made up the bottom of the list, Apple floated somewhere in the middle and cell phone makers got the highest marks.  Below is the list with each company's score from 1 - 10 (10 being the best) with the brief explanation of the score provided by Greenpeace.

  • 7.45  Nokia - Scores top marks for leading competitors on toxic phase out.
  • 7.1    Samsung - Holds second position for commitment to reduce absolute emissions.
  • 6.5    Sony Ericsson - Up two places with better product energy efficiency reporting.
  • 5.7    LG Electronics - Up two places but needs to eliminate hazardous chemicals from all products.
  • 5.5    Toshiba - Moves up two places with an extra point for promising to cut GHGs.
  • 5.5    Motorola - Scores higher and climbs two places because of use of renewable energy
  • 5.3    Philips - Falls from 4th to 7th position and needs to put its commitment to responsible recycling policies into practice.
  • 5.3    Sharp - Rises from 9th to joint 7th place with its energy efficient products.
  • 4.9    Acer - Put out 16 new models of a monitor that are almost free of hazardous chemicals and climbed two places from 11 to 9 but still needs to sort out the power cord.
  • 4.9    Panasonic - Advance from 12th to 10th place for energy efficiency and PVC-free product range, but still bad on e-waste.
  • 4.7    Apple - Drops one position to 11th with no change in scores but gets kudos for their green MacBook.
  • 4.5    Sony - Plunges from 5th to 12th place for inadequate commitments on eliminating hazardous chemicals, e-waste policy and cutting GHGs.
  • 3.9    Dell - Stays at 13th place because of backtracking on toxic phase out.
  • 3.5    HP - Is at 14th position and has no products on the market free of toxic substances.
  • 2.5    Microsoft - Loses a point for a poor recycling policy but stays in 15th position.
  • 2.5    Lenovo - Down two places with no set timeline for toxic phase out on all products.
  • 2.4    Fujitsu - Debuts second from last with no products that are free of hazardous chemicals.
  • 1       Nintendo - Stays put in last position with a glimmer of hope with partially PVC-free consoles.
As you can see, this year PC makers were highly criticized for either backtracking on commitments to remove hazardous chemicals from their products or not producing a policy to do so at all.  You can download a PDF of the full scorecard here.

via Greenpeace International

 
Panasonic Speeds Up Recycling with Lasers
Written by Megan Treacy on 02/07/09   
crt-recycling
At the Panasonic Eco Technology Center in Kato, Japan, they've come up with a way to recycle old CRT TVs three times faster.  Typically, workers could only disassemble 24 sets per hour because of the time-consuming task of separating the thick glass contained in the front and backs of the tubes.  Now, with a new method that users a powerful laser, workers can disassemble 72 per hour.

The laser system has also allowed the center to handle more TV sizes than the old hot wire method they had been using, increasing the amount of sets being recycled by the center by an even larger amount.  This new method was developed right on time, as Japan is transitioning from analog to digital broadcasting in July 2011, meaning the volume of CRTs arriving for recycling is about to double.

Japan requires the recycling of many home electronics, including CRT and flat-panel TVs.

via PC World
 

rss Subscribe via RSS
at
Twitter Follow Us on Twitter
Stumble Follow Us on Stumble Upon
Here at EcoGeek we write about all the various and powerful ways in which our brains are saving our planet. Enjoy!




JUL 02

Recent Comment

"Unless they are funding an expansion to the generation facility at Nia..."

View all Comments
Yahoo Data Center Will Be Powered By Niagara Falls
Written by Megan Treacy on 02/07/09   

niagara-falls
Companies like Google and IBM are trying to lead the world in cutting-edge, efficient data centers.  Not to be outdone, on Tuesday Yahoo announced they're hoping to change to future of data centers as well.  The company unveiled plans to build one of the world's most efficient data centers in Lockport, NY and the details do sound pretty exciting.

The data center will be powered mainly by hydroelectric power from Niagara Falls, with 90 percent of that energy going towards powering the servers.  The center itself will be built to resemble a chicken coop, using 100 percent outside air to cool the servers, a task which typically gobbles up 50 percent of a data center's energy supply.  And the company expects the yearly PUE average to be 1.1 or better.

In addition to building this super-efficient data center, the company also committed to reducing the carbon footprint of all their data centers by 40 percent by 2014.  They intend to accomplish this through using more renewable energy sources to power their data centers, implementing more efficient building designs and improving the efficiency of the servers themselves.

Another major commitment made in this announcement was that the company would cease purchasing carbon offsets and was aiming to reduce their carbon impact directly through decreasing energy consumption.  We would love to hear of more companies relying less on offsets and more on energy-saving improvements.

via Yahoo Blog

 

JUL 01

Recent Comment

"thats a good way of saving gas..."

View all Comments
Can a Solar Airplane Circle the Globe?
Written by Megan Treacy on 01/07/09   

solar-impulse
In earlier days of aviation, flying around the world was the ultimate test of pilots and new aircraft and now in the days of alternative-fueled aviation, it seems that test remains the ultimate challenge.  Bertran Piccard, the pilot of the first nonstop, round-the-world balloon flight, hopes to achieve that goal in a solar-powered airplane called the Solar Impulse.

The Solar Impulse design was first unveiled in late 2007, but now a working prototype has been developed.  The plane will get a chance to take its first test flight at the end of the year.  The test flight will consist of flight sequences over two days and one night.  If successful, the team will start preparing for the round-the-world flight.

The Impulse is made of carbon fiber, has a wingspan of 63 meters and is covered in 12,000 solar PV cells.  The power generated by the solar cells is stored in over 400 kg of batteries, which allow for flying at night.  The plane is propelled by four ten-horsepower electric motors.  It can't reach great speeds, meaning circling the globe will take a long time, but if it accomplishes such a feat, we'll know that solar-powered air travel (as well as other types of transportation) could have a real future.

via Inhabitat

 

JUL 01

Recent Comment

"WTF "but if the owner takes 45-minute showers, the shower head becomes..."

View all Comments
New LEED Certification Will Require Energy Reporting
Written by Megan Treacy on 01/07/09   

leed-reporting
Green architecture and design is so important in the world's quest for greater energy efficiency, but a green design is only as good as the person using it.  A low-flow shower head is a great tool for cutting back on water use, but if the owner takes 45-minute showers, the shower head becomes negligible.  Luckily, the U.S. Green Building Council wants to make sure its LEED program stands for more than just Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, but also leadership in energy and environmental performance.

The USGBC announced last week that all projects seeking LEED certification will be required to report their energy and water use as a condition of certification.  This new requirement will allow the USGBC to collect information for future versions of LEED and to ensure that the certification doesn't just mean a building has green features, but is also operating in the most efficient way possible.

The USGBC hopes that energy reporting will highlight any gaps between design and performance that can lead to both better design and better behavior on the part of building occupants.  Any projects applying for certification will have three options for fulfilling this requirement.  They can report energy and water usage on a yearly basis, apply for recertification every two years under LEED for Existing Buildings or they can sign a release authorizing the USGBC to access their energy and water usage directly from their utility.

The council is working to eventually have all LEED buildings metered in some way so that this information is collected automatically.

via USGBC

 

 

JUL 01

Recent Comment

"This should be implemented in all schools no matter the cost it'll pay..."

View all Comments
College Ups Energy Efficiency and Saves $5 Million
Written by Megan Treacy on 01/07/09   

university-illinois
The University of Illinois, Urbana has not only met its goal of reducing energy consumption by 10 percent, but has saved a whopping $5 million as a result.  The college started the project to cut its energy use only 10 months ago, but they had given themselves a year to accomplish their goal.

The reduction in energy use was achieved by updating old lighting fixtures and ballasts in the buildings that used the most electricity.  The school identified 44 buildings to update and have already made the changes in 24 of them.  The remaining buildings will be updated in the second phase through the end of the year.

Another major factor in the energy savings was the installation of programmable controls and occupancy sensors in several buildings.  The controls have not only led to a 27% energy savings in each building that they were installed, but the Faciliites and Services Department has reported fewer complaints involving the heating, cooling and lighting systems.

The project was funded mainly by grants and rebates and cost about $5 million so far, so the updates have given the school an almost immediate return on investment.  The school estimates that the upgrades will amount to energy bill savings of $1 million a year and as they continue to increase energy efficiency in more buildings, they expect to see that number rise.

via Treehugger

 

JUN 30

Recent Comment

"I lot of this land is in the middle of nowhere. I would have thought ..."

View all Comments
Interior Department Considering 1,000 Square Miles of Federal Land for Solar Development
Written by Megan Treacy on 30/06/09   

fed-land-solar
Yesterday, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar signed an order that set aside 676,000 acres of federal land out west for the possibility of developing solar projects.  Of the huge lot, 351,000 acres are located in the Mojave Desert with the rest located in areas in California, Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah.

The land will be studied for the next two years and environmental reviews will be performed to determine the ability to safely develop large solar projects.  Protected lands are not being considered for these projects.  The proposed areas in California could generate 39,000 to 70,000 MW of electricity and serve millions of homes if fully developed.

This news follows promises by Obama and Salazar to have 10 percent of the nation's electricity coming from renewable sources by 2012 and to have 13 commercial-scale solar projects under construction by the end of 2010.  The two-year study will open up the areas to leasing by private companies and will cost about $22 million.

via LA Times

 

 

JUN 29

Recent Comment

"First of all, FutureGen is not new technology. It IS IGCC, plus CO2 c..."

View all Comments
NYT Op-Ed Defends IGCC
Written by Yoni Levinson on 29/06/09   

clean_coal

An interesting op-ed from yesterday’s New York Times discusses clean coal.  I encourage our readers to read the piece themselves, but for those who want the short version, here’s a summary:

1. FutureGen, a federal program to design a zero-emission clean coal power plant is not going to work for two main reasons:

  • Zero-emission clean coal technology doesn’t exist, and might take a really long time to get here
  • Huge, politically charged federal research projects like these have not historically accomplished anything
2, If the government is going to support some kind of clean coal, it should support IGCC (Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle), for three reasons:
  • IGCC technology already exists
  • Once Washington passes a cap-and-trade law of some kind, the cost of carbon will make IGCC cost-competitive
  • To generate the same amount of electricity as regular coal plants, IGCC plants use only one third of the coal, which means they naturally cut GHG emissions by two thirds
An important take away message is that when people throw around the term “clean coal”, they may be referring to different things.  Here we see two distinct technologies – one theoretical, nonexistent technology that promises zero emissions by sequestering all the carbon dioxide underground, and another, existing technology which squeezes more power out of less coal by gasifying it first (this also makes it easier to sequester the CO2, but we’re not even getting into that now).

However, though I agree with the author that the government should be worrying about practical solutions rather than (in his words) pie-in-the-sky ideas, I think he overplays the benefits of IGCC.  True, the technology exists, but it’s extremely expensive.  Carbon legislation isn’t going to make it cheaper, it’s just going to make everything else really expensive too.  You can’t really expect every utility to pour money into a technology that, while proven, is still wet behind the ears.

But – and this is the author’s main point – the government can, and it should.

Via NYTimes
 

JUN 29

Recent Comment

"I've seen this for years in Europe, and I've called them the "not so s..."

View all Comments
Incentives Slash Cost of smart fortwo to $99/month
Written by Megan Treacy on 29/06/09   

fortwo-deal
Smart USA is hoping to take advantage of the recently passed "Cash-for-Clunkers" program by offering its own joint incentive to lure buyers.  The car hasn't been selling as well in the US as the company hoped, but now with the new incentives making it possible to get one for cheap, that may all change.

The company is offering 4.2 percent financing on the car through the end of July.  When combined with the highest voucher level of $4,500 through Cash-for-Clunkers, you're looking at a fortwo for $99 a month.  The fortwo has had limited appeal because of its small size and the fact that the fuel economy is not much better than some roomier cars that sale for the same price.  These incentives may tilt the balance in the smart's favor though.  At a time when people are concerned with fuel economy and getting a good deal, it may turn out to be a great business move.

I'd love to see other car makers offering similar incentives to go with the Cash-for-Clunkers program.  Making their most fuel-efficient models extra affordable would not only lead to better business for them, but more efficient cars on the road. Instead of people using the program to trade in an old gas-guzzler for a newer, only slightly less gas-guzzling model, we could possibly see this program make a noticeable difference in overall fuel use and emissions.

via Autoblog Green

 

JUN 29

Recent Comment

"But - the bill as written provides for offset payments to anyone at or..."

View all Comments
Climate Bill Will Save Us Money...on Gas
Written by Megan Treacy on 29/06/09   

gas-savings
The Waxman-Markey climate bill passed the House on Friday, but it still has to face the Senate and the changes that body may require.  There has been a lot of controversy over the many aspects of the bill, particularly relating to the coal industry, cap and trade and whether it's strong enough legislation to make a difference, but the lovely people over at the NRDC have pointed out one glowingly positive element of the bill.  They've calculated that the bill will end up saving American households an average of $13.93 a month on gas.

The bill includes funding for fuel-efficient vehicles, which, in addition to the fuel efficiency standards already adopted, the NRDC calculates will lead to a 25 percent increase in fuel efficiency by 2020.  So, even with rising gas prices, the increase in fuel efficiency will still slash our monthly gas bills.  The group estimates the monthly savings for each state, and they range from $5.50 a month to more than $23 a month.  I'm lucky enough to live in a state where I could see savings of almost $22 a month.

An interesting thing to point out is that these gas savings almost negate the cost of the bill for the average family, which is estimated to be $175 per year by the US Budget Office.  The decrease in gas spending will save the average family about $167 a year, meaning the bill will only cost $8 a year per family.  Families in some states will actually see a net gain.

It's easy to listen to all the pundits and all the partisan opinions on this legislation and to be discouraged, but I appreciate the NRDC putting at least part of it into perspective.  Fighting climate change will require money and sacrifices, but there will be a whole host of ways in which it will pay off.   In this case, in cash.

via Treehugger

 

 

JUN 26

Recent Comment

"@Emma: That looks very much like a website made by the oil industry to..."

View all Comments
U.N. Tapping into Social Media for Climate Treaty Inspiration
Written by Megan Treacy on 26/06/09   

hopenhagen
The U.N. has launched a social media site to inspire international leaders to create a meaningful climate treaty in Copenhagen this December.  The site called Hopenhagen, allows people around the world to create a Twitter-like post (45 characters max) answering the question "What gives you hope for a better planet?"

The site reads:

On December 7, 2009, leaders from 192 countries will gather at the UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, Denmark to determine the fate of our planet. Let's turn Copenhagen into Hopenhagen. Hopenhagen is a movement, a moment and a chance at a new beginning. The hope that we can create a global community that will lead our leaders into making the right decisions. The hope that by solving our environmental crisis, we can solve our economic crisis at the same time. Hopenhagen is change – and that change will be powered by all of us.

As people post their responses, a constant moving feed runs down the screen, listing all the statements.  Obviously, it will take more than 45-character expressions to produce an effective climate treaty, but the more pressure we can put on the world's leaders to commit to significant change, the better.

via Environmental Capital

 


Are you an EcoGeek?

We've got to keep 6 billion people happy without destroying our planet. It's the biggest challenge we've ever faced....but we're taking it on. Are you with us?