Priligy online now, save money

MAY 04

Recent Comment

"sprawls are really not good ..."

View all Comments

Sprawl Can Be Worse than the Buildings Themselves

Is sprawl really so terrible? Of course we are trying to make greener buildings, and many think that efficiency improvements in buildings are the most important part of the solution. But the distance a home is from facilities, services and workplaces is a significant factor in the amount of energy that a home uses.

As the old real estate maxim says, location matters! In fact, the energy needed for transportation can be a bigger portion of canada drug cialis the total energy used than the amount used for the house itself.
In conventional suburban development, an average American home uses 108 million BTUs (British Thermal Units--a measure of energy consumption) per year for operation (heating, cooling, lighting, etc.). But that same house uses 132 million BTUs per year in transportation energy use--for a total of 240 million BTU/year. In other words, for that average home, 55% of its total energy use is cheap discount viagra for transportation, and 45% is for operations.

A very green and energy efficient building can be more than undone by locating that building in a remote area. Even a net-zero energy house can be more of a drain on energy infrastructure if it is remotely located. Furthermore, the amount of energy and effort needed to extend infrastructure (roads, sewer and water lines, electricity and gas lines, etc.) is also an enormous drain on resources and materials.

Recently, the same complaint has been raised with the planned relocation of the EPA's Regional Headquarters in Kansas City KS, which is being moved from the downtown to a more isolated, suburban location, where transport emissions are expected to be 3 times as much as for the previous location.

Buildings need to be greener, but paying attention to the larger systems is also crucial in making meaningful change needed to get to a more energy efficient future.

image: CC BY-SA 3.0 by SimonP/Wikimedia

via: BuildingGreen

Hits: 18429
Comments (3)Add Comment
What about the layout?
written by Eletruk, May 06, 2011
Also the method of laying out the suburban tracts can add to the inefficiency. Rather than putting them on a grid, with easier direct routes, many suburban developments have winding streets that can require residents to drive additional distance, even miles just to get to and from their houses.
Infill lots
written by Jessica Janes, May 19, 2011
Until gas prices are painful, many people will be under the false notion that driving to the burbs means more bang for their buck with or without an energy efficient home to go to. When we live closer to the center of our community, we are more likely to click now generic viagra effective walk, bike, take public transportation and canadian healthcare pharmacy interact with people. The suburbs are hurting more than the environment and our wallet - -our communities.
written by kathrine bocsh, July 09, 2011
sprawls are really not good

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


Are you an EcoGeek?

We've got to keep 7 billion people happy without destroying our planet. It's the biggest challenge we've ever faced....but we're taking it on. Are you with us?

The Most Popular Articles