
Formula One, like so many cutting-edge consumers, has announced that it is going hybrid. Unlike those consumers, however, Formula One will be using the Kinetic Energy Recovery System (KERS), a fundamentally different piece of technology from what currently available hybrids rely on for assistance.
KERS is a 55-pound hybrid addition (light by hybrid standards, but heavy by Formula One standards) that stores kinetic energy in a flywheel in the vehicle’s transmission. This kinetic energy can then be used at the push of a “boost” button on the steering wheel. Instead of using batteries and electric motors for energy storage, KERS relies on mechanical energy storage.
The people behind KERS are excited about the technology, and not just because they like to see cars go really fast. Evidently KERS is twice as efficient as current battery hybrids and has possible application in millions of production vehicles. If this system gets into consumer hands, it could mean more GHG reductions for potentially less money and less production-related environmental impact.
Via Gas2.org

written by Oudai Al-Daoud, April 28, 2008
written by james, April 28, 2008
written by Dark0, April 28, 2008
written by Dean, April 28, 2008
written by jinks, April 28, 2008
Either way it seems more practical to me to have some sort of oil/gas pressurization chamber to store mechanical energy. I'm not sure how heavy a system like that might get, but there are fewer moving parts and maintenance issues I would think.
written by FlossyThePig, April 30, 2008
written by eleventh, April 30, 2008
written by Jacque, May 14, 2008
written by ALFONSO, November 29, 2008
By the way, if you install two identical flywheels rotating againts each other, any force created gets cancelled. But in the other way if can help you to balance a vehicle, that why bikes ride easy with two wheels when going fast, the wheels act like giroscopes.
A flywheel is a disc that rotates at high RPMs, when you stop it using a generator, you get electricity which can then power an electric motor.
written by Kevin, February 08, 2010
written by Ian Sharp, April 01, 2010
Sadly corporate engineers got involved that did not know a thing about racing and were skeptical in the outset plus did not have equity in the project. I was moved off the project as Corporate ego's and people wishing to claim the project as there own rose to the fore. Sad because it was a viable project before the Chrysler engineers entrusted with the project went down a ridiclous route of non standard componets, non production engineering which ultimately failed whereas Chrysler could have been 15 years ahead of all the opposition. If anyone wants to know more about the original concept email me This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it '> This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it ...
P.S I also speced out Reynard and J&P motorsport in Atlanta as the engineering source for the build and chassis design, as my experience came from Formula 1 before joining Chrysler in 1990.
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
APR 27
"Hi this is Ian Sharp. I was the originator and the engineer at Chrysle..."
View all Comments