So it looks like the world's cheapest car (the Tata Nano) could soon be the world's cheapest electric car as well.
The price of the Nano is just above $2,500 and Tata's chairman Ratan Tata says he expects demand to exceed supply. Tata's plant in the city of Singur in the state of West Bengal will eventually have the capacity to make 350,000 Nanos a year.
Tata Motors plans to make a second generation of its four-passenger Nano with a diesel engine. But initially, it will have a gasoline engine capable of 50 miles to the gallon.
But the interesting news out of Mr. Tata's talk to shareholders at the annual general meeting last week was that the company is competing for an Eco car in Thailand and looking at other ways to make even more fuel-efficient versions of the Nano.
Tata is working with a French firm in developing an electric Nano. The electric car will use compressed air. Tata Motors also announced earlier this year it is in talks with Chrysler on developing electric vehicles.
According to the Economic Times of India, a diesel engine for the Nano is being developed by a German company and will use a fuel injection system. Sources told the newspaper that the 800 cc, turbo charged diesel engine will be a two-cylinder and capable of at least 30 per cent more mileage compared to 800 cc gasoline powered cars.
It's hoped that the cheap vehicle willenable more people in developing countries to be able to afford their own car. But at the same time, there are concerns about the congestion and pollution caused by more cars on the road. In India, there are seven motorcycles sold for every car, according to the World Bank.
An all-electric or efficient diesel option would certainly decrease from those concerns. However, with India being coal powered, and lagging on emissions standards, it's not clear how much greener these cars really will be.
Via: Bloomberg and Reuters and Autobloggreen

written by cameron, July 31, 2008
Make it electric, and cheap, you have something that will sell like hot cakes.
Maybe Tata should work with Tesla to make something for the american market.
written by DaMs, July 31, 2008
they signed a deal for 20M € for licensing the engine & co devellopment last february, but it won't be electric.
it's either a full air compressed car or or dual energy (any fuel compressed air to lenghten the range)
you can find further info about MDI and compressed air car for north america here :
http://www.catvolution.com/
DaMs
written by Ta TA, July 31, 2008
written by BuddyFarr, July 31, 2008
written by Evil One, July 31, 2008
This vehicle will NEVER pass safety or emissions standards (you know, the one the greenies insist all cars pass, hence the expensive catalytic converters, computers etc)
One rule for them, another for us.
written by Garry Golden, July 31, 2008
posted at http://www.memebox.com/futureblogger
written by GS, July 31, 2008
All diesel engines are fuel injected.
written by Chris, July 31, 2008
written by Mouse, July 31, 2008
written by thony bryant, July 31, 2008
written by MrDinosaur, July 31, 2008
You wrote in your post:
These are not just cars for the developing world, they are just as appropriate for the soon to become 2nd world economies like the US and the EU.
I have to take issue with this statement. Ignorance is a pet peeve of mine. Economies can be best summarized by GDP. To put this into perspective the GDP of just one state in the US; take California for instance - has a GDP of 1.7 trillion per annum which is the same range as China, Italy and Spain. This is only one state in the US - representing only 13% of the United States overall GDP.
Yes the US dollar has suffered recently because of foreign policy issues, but a keen mind can recognize that much of that is temporary - and administrations change and so does policy.
Economic cycles tend to run in 7 - 12 year cycles and much of the economic fluctuation that has persisted over the past 3 years in the US and EU will cycle out just as is did in the early 60's, early 70's and Mid 90's ( see a pattern here? ).
Of late I have become a little irritated at the fallacy of presumption that gets made by those keen to make hasty generalizations about subject matters they know nothing of. I don't often reply to postings on blogs, but felt I had to this time to counter the cacophony of ignorance that undermines the progress Americans and Europeans still are and continue to make.
written by Ty Moss, July 31, 2008
written by shdwsclan, August 01, 2008
Additionally, with electric cars, new problems have arisen. The electromagnetic field generated by the high voltage is harmful to living organisms,and the cabin should be shielded by a Faraday cage.
written by CitizenX, August 01, 2008
written by MrDinosaur, August 01, 2008
Thanks for the link. An interesting read. There is a huge chasm between a free market economy and Socialism. while I agree Social Communism had some great ideas one of it most glaring shortcomings is that the government had more capacity to take advantage of the people then classes of merchants do as we have here in the US. You cant fire the government or just get a new one. When your housing, job and food comes from them it's your only choice. In the US if you don't like your boss, your job you can quit and find a new one, you can go to school and become a doctor if motivated. In free market economies the desire to do and have more is such a compelling force that it pulls social progress along with it even if begrudgingly.
Free market economies are very difficult to collapse. Even if the government were to go out of business eventfully trader classes of individuals form and fill the vacuum. Eventually pulling the whole system up by the boot straps.
It is estimated the great depression was a much more severe economic problem then the USSR faced before it's collapse. The reason the US was able to pull out was because the inherent way the free market capitalisms works. It's not perfect and as in any complex system some classes of people get the short end of the stick. Like I said it's not perfect - fortunately it doesn't need to be to work.
The desire to buy things and improve the quality of life is a significant motivator. It's a powerful motivator for many to know the next shiny new thing is around the corner ... you just need to work for it. With Communism a huge economic drawback was that for the average person additionally effort didn't mean additional compensation or improvement, it just meant you got more work, so why work twice as hard for the same compensation as your coworker. When this happens work product stagnates and so does GDP - the driving force of economies, which was my point in my first posting.
written by Mike, August 01, 2008
written by ray, August 02, 2008
written by WillG, August 06, 2008
written by ummer puthu veettil, August 09, 2008
written by Tata Nano, February 15, 2009
written by WillG, March 25, 2009
I read a great article about the Nano, though it is actually part of a series of articles. The latest one is titled "Tata Releases the Nano, No Thanks to Mamata Banerjee" and it is found at http://economicefficiency.blog...amata.html
Apparently, the politics behind building this car is out of this world.
written by mrelectric, March 26, 2009
written by iyer, March 27, 2009
It would be a great thing to book this vehicle online.
written by Ahmed, April 05, 2009
Thanks/Ahmed
written by Honda Jazz In India, February 22, 2011
written by Honda Brio, September 12, 2011
Engine:-
All aluminium rear mounted MPFI
EMS: 32-bit microprocessor
Piston displacement: 624 cc, petrol with single balancer shaft
Drive train: rear wheel drive
Cylinder count: 2 cylinders
Valve gear: 4 valves, 2 valves per cylinder
Max power: 35 Bhp@ 5500rpm
Torque: 4.8kgm@ 3000 rpm
Compression ratio: 9.7:1
Power to weight ratio: 0.58
Acceleration: 0-60 kmph: 8 secs
Top speed: 105 kmph
Gradeability – 30%
KMPL – 23.6
Emission levels -BS II and BS III ( CO2 levels
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Recent Comment
Share
GM, Toyota and Ford will be shown to be dinosaurs that they are by these cars.