
**Note** The US News Blog Post has been corrected...though not really to the extend I would have liked to see.
OK, so, there's a bit of a problem with the internet, or at least the way journalists are dealing with it. I'll be the first to recognize that, and this is a grade A example of that.
I just read an article at the Huffington Post that said scooters pollute more than Hummers. That article cites a US News and World Report blog post which, in turn, cites a Chicago Tribune advice column.
The problem is that the original question was "do two-stroke scooters pollute more than Hummers" the answer to which (depending on your definition of "pollute" is yes. The problem with this is that the vast majority of scooters sold in America today have four-stroke engines, just like cars, and most of them meet strict European emissions regulations, since Europe is the largest scooter market.
A U.S. News and World Report Green Blog then took the Tribune advice column and made a blanket statement implying that, unless they are electric, scooters produce more polluting gasses than Hummers. That, of course, is a blatantly false. They even cite Vespas specifically, which is hilarious given that they average 60 mpg and haven't used 2-stroke engines for almost a decade.
Go to your local scooter dealer, see if you can find a single 2-stroke scooter on the lot. Excluding mo-peds, you'll be out of luck.
Please join me in emailing the US News Blog editor to tell them to note that they were wrong on the articles, so google searchers don't give up on their scooter-buying dreams. I take that back...our overwhelming force got the change implemented in less than 24 hours...good work y'all.

written by j1mmyc_, April 12, 2009
Additionally if a city were to plan for smaller vehicles such as scooters and compact cars in mind rather than providing massive parking spaces and lots for over-sized vehicles the result will be more compact, more efficient, more transit oriented, and less polluting cities.
written by N., April 13, 2009
written by Yael, April 13, 2009
Except I couldn't care less.
written by Steve A., April 13, 2009
Not quite. My local Ducati Dealer sells 'Genuine Scooter Company' Scooters, including their 'Stella' model. They are 150cc 2-stroke scooters and are available in every state except CA. My wife owns a 2006 model, and it's quite fun and has a top speed of 60+ mph. But yes, it is very, very bad for the environment.
http://www.genuinescooters.com/scooters/stella/stella.html
written by Bill, April 13, 2009
Also, the quantity of exhaust used by scooters is probably minuscule compared to all the 2-stroke lawn equipment out there.
written by Steve A., April 13, 2009
In one of the more recent Bill Nye's 'Stuff Happens' episodes on Planet Green, he states that using a 2-stroke leaf blower for 30 minutes "pollutes as much as driving a car for 2200 miles."
A typical 2-stroke dumps as much as 30% of their fuel/oil out the tailpipe, unburned. Where a modern car has a fairly clean burning system of electronic ignition, emissions controls, timing controls and a catalytic converter.
Total CO2 per mile driven may be in the 2-stroke scooter's favor, however the other, more directly hazardous to human health emissions are vastly higher. The average hydrocarbon emission of a 2-stroke, per mile, is 10-22 times higher than an SUV.
written by Mark Haines, April 14, 2009
written by Funtomas, April 14, 2009
However, by pointing to this issue, people my start demanding cleaner scooters. And guess what, I bet the electric scooters, by the way already in market, will be first to start the inevitable electric-powered commuting revolution.
Is Europe really the largest scooter market? I beg to differ as I believe the triumph belongs to Asia.
written by Gregory, April 14, 2009
written by Zaharastra, April 14, 2009
written by ABQ Bear, April 14, 2009
written by edgerunner, April 20, 2009
written by matt kennedy, April 21, 2009
Steve A gets it, and it's not about engine size. The SIMPLE fact is this(Sorry for the shouting but I feel the need!): IF YOU RUN A 2-STROKE ENGINE and A HUMMER ENGINE FOR A MINUTE, THE 2-STROKE WILL EMIT FAR, FAR, FAR, FAR, FAAAAAAR MORE POLLUTANTS (esp. toxic ones) THAN THE HUMMER!
It's not 'proportional', it's ACTUAL!
As Steve A. quoted:
"The average hydrocarbon emission of a 2-stroke, per mile, is 10-22 times higher than an SUV.".
I'm an ex (classic) Vespa owner, and I LOVE them. But I wouldn't ride anything but a 4-stroke from now on.
m@
(1) Footnote: Europe apparently IS the biggest market for Scooters (for now). Asia has more motorcycles and mo-peds.
(2) Leaf-blowers are one of my most hated devices ever. they're noisy, VERY polluting and they don't work well anyway. USE A BLOODY BROOM AND A RAKE AMERICA! (Yes, we have them here too but it's America which is in love with the lazy, inefficient decadence of the leaf-blower so I'm blaming YOU! ;-) )
written by Dan Grinde, April 25, 2009
The oil-mixed 2-stroke is a sad thing indeed. Even so, a major reduction in overall petroleum consumption must remain high priority. There are several REALLY COOL pedal/electric bicycles available...plug-in at work or overnight.
The observation that a NEW water-cooled 4-stroke (Hummer?? OK, I guess...)pollutes less than an ancient Yamaha or a Sears weedeater is hard to argue with. Sadly, many of us know that working folks try to squeeze 2 or 3 HUNDRED THOUSAND miles out of their cars and trucks...in Japan many motors with more than 50K Km on them must be rebuilt, or even better, dismantled and shipped to the USA as "rebuilt".
I agree with the crowd here: The bicycle is tops; electric bikes and scooters go farther faster; 4-strokes are much cleaner...the smoggers must be recycled...
written by L, April 25, 2009
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Recent Comment
Share
http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/6424ac1caa800aab85257359003f5337/0cb7669b182b145d852572c0005e415a!OpenDocument