The idea of self-driving vehicles has been getting increasing attention on several fronts. Google's self-driving car is perhaps the most widely publicized example, but other options are under development at various stages. Volvo is working on a different approach, with cars that are not completely autonomous, but that can safely follow others in a close formation known as a road train.
In a road train, vehicles equipped with wireless connectivity and control equipment will be able to follow other vehicles in close formation, with a lead vehicle being driven by a human driver. Computers and sensors will monitor the convoy, and automatically follow the lead vehicle with safe clearances. Once a vehicle is part of a road train, the driver can can switch their attention to other things.
Road trains would offer a number of benefits that are beneficial to the environment as well as to drivers.
Fuel mileage will improve, as vehicles stay at the same speed (acceleration reduces efficiency). Cars can safely drive more closely to one another, and will benefit from lowered wind resistance. With groups of cars moving at predictable speeds, congestion will improve. And the stress of the daily commute will be alleviated, with time in the car to read or relax.
The Volvo system has been undergoing testing for the past several years. A video presentation from Volvo shows vehicles operating on a test track to demonstrate the workings of this system.
Hat tip to: Jaymi Heimbuch

written by KM, December 11, 2012
written by Cathie, December 12, 2012
written by Brian Bell, December 16, 2012
written by Bob, December 17, 2012
written by carol, December 17, 2012
Volvo on the other hand, are a respectable company with a long history and culture of road safety innovation.
Google? Just say no.
written by Webbing, December 19, 2012
written by Antoine, December 19, 2012
Public transportation is the future, not individual.
written by Mark, December 29, 2012
written by Philosopherott, January 02, 2013
2) Volvo being a trusted company, yeah they only gave them selves awesome safety ratings for about 2 decades. Not saying they are not safe but why not submit to outside testing for your advertised safety ratings before it became mandatory.
3) While I like trains in Europe, studies prove that most mid size sedans are more fuel efficient than most trains per passenger; meaning it takes more fuel/energy per person for a train than a mid sized car. Imagine if you had a smart diesel or hybrid and carpooled you would kick a trains but.
I love the idea of having a car automatically draft a bus or truck for fuel savings and automation but I think a lot more studying needs to be done and a slight revamp of our highway infrastructure.
written by Data management, January 04, 2013
Instead, the driver would definitely want to reach his destination ASAP and would not be interested in formating some road train.
written by shuttles to lax, January 15, 2013
written by Cthulhu, January 21, 2013
Negatives are that this can be seen as a form of oppresion, and just imagine the criminal possiblities. Aside from satellite tracking, anything can be hacked. Imagine sitting there in your car, when suddenlly you take an unexpected course into a steep ditch. Just sayin'. I say, the benefits are too great and too easy to manipulate. There will always be somebody good enough to manipulate whatever technology is out there. Hence, crime.
Though I disagree with the problem of the pileups. Say the front vehicle was infact subjected to some kind of accident, like a crash, assuming the following cars are travelling at a safe distance, wouldn't the lead vehicle stopping cause following vehicles to stop behind it? Or else travelling through traffic lights and turning corners could be an issue. I'm not exactly the physics 'spert here(and I only scanned the above article and comments), but that would be my guess.
Also, things like these are unnessesary, and support two extremes of common human behaviour: 1. laziness and 2. whatever you call being too busy.
Both can lead to serious physical and mental health issues.
I do not believe this kind of technology to be suitable for the roads, but I'm certain it can be useful in other areas.
[opinions]
written by Rinkesh, January 23, 2013
. Thing of the future.
written by bluetoes591, January 25, 2013
written by Tom Simpson, February 01, 2013
written by Jones Edward, May 16, 2013
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
DEC 11
"Various automobile industries are trying to develop their techniques a..."
View all Comments