
The American southwest: home to some of the world's finest foods, four -- count 'em, four -- corners, and the biggest dreams of solar geeks and "well-meaning scientists," according to Scientific American:
The U.S. is lucky to be endowed with a vast resource; at least 250,000 square miles of land in the Southwest alone are suitable for constructing solar power plants, and that land receives more than 4,500 quadrillion British thermal units (Btu) of solar radiation a year. Converting only 2.5 percent of that radiation into electricity would match the nation's total energy consumption in 2006.
SciAm outlines -- in some depth -- a big, geeky plan for providing nearly 70 percent of the U.S.'s electricity by 2050. It costs an awful lot of money, and it's not quite as sexy as, say, something that spews pollution out of its backside at 100 mph -- I've been saying for a long time that an electric car has to win a NASCAR race for renewable energy to be taken seriously -- but it's evidently quite possible quite soon.
The story addresses land needs, environmental concerns, and financial and technological obstacles. It's not even just photovoltaic cells, baby. They get into steam, power storage, molten salt (!), and nationwide distribution. One point they seem to have missed, though, is that nobody's gonna pretend to think there are WMDs on the sun. So there's that advantage, too.

written by Mark R., January 23, 2008
written by Denny, January 24, 2008
The author probably considers pizza with everything on it right up there with spicy chicken wings.
written by albert, January 24, 2008
written by CNCMike, January 24, 2008
http://www.nationalpriorities.org/costofwar_home
written by Dave, January 24, 2008
written by Leonard, January 26, 2008
http://www.uic.com.au/nip28.htm
This article also demonstrates the great progress made by world scientists in nuclear power technology reactor efficiency (less fuel to produce more power), safety and re-usability of "spent" fuel rods (recycle spent rods to extract still usable fuel thereby reducing the spent rods storage problem).
written by SolarDave, January 28, 2008
Actually read the SciAm article, and then take the time to leaf through the 28 pages of comments (about 420 so far). The authors are actively involved in the discussion and have defended all comers regarding the efficiency and feasibility of their system. Let's get this done! I wrote to my congressional representatives referencing and attaching this link; we should all take the same and more action to make sure that we don't waste another 35 years after 1973's oil embargo with nothing to show for it. Thanks for your support - and action. This article can be a game changer if we do something about it.
written by Imagine, January 28, 2008
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Recent Comment
Share
As we have seen for the past 5 years, the oil companies have achieved the greatest profits in their history. The coal companies are big players in Washigton. They will spending $35 millions to convinced America that coal is safe.
We are against great opponents entrenched in our political system. If there is a place where it can be broken is in the Southwest. :)