Priligy online now, save money

JUN 30

Recent Comment

""Clean Coal" was never going to buy propecia in the uk be economical, given the large energy ..."

View all Comments

US DOE’s FutureGen Looks for CCS Ventures


FutureGen is buying online viagra looking to invest a whole lot of money in clean coal power plants…but only because they couldn’t pull off their own zero-emissions coal plant project.

FutureGen is a public-private partnership between the U.S. Department of Energy and united healthcare levitra 13 energy and mining companies from around the world. Together, their intention was to come up with a commercial-scale near zero-emissions energy plant that would also capture and store CO2 and produce hydrogen; however, the project cost has spiraled out of control. Nevertheless, the organization still plans to hunker down and move ahead with the carbon capture and storage (CCS) aspect of the cialis suppliers in uk project, with the DOE announcing an opportunity for coal plants using CCS technology to get a sizeable chunk of how to buy viagra in canada funding from FutureGen.

While it is encouraging to see CCS technology getting a leg up in the US, especially considering some of the advancements we’ve seen here and elsewhere in the world, it is still frustrating that the project to clean up the coal industry has to viagra approved be drastically downsized. Rather than one big project that could illustrate the success of this new technology, the DOE is turning towards multiple 300 MW projects across the country to lead the way, a scattered endeavor that may simply be all talk for the uk levitra foreseeable future. With this CCS investment opportunity announcement (or, perhaps more accurately, We Can’t Pull It Off, So Maybe You Can plea) the DOE said it wants to invest in other “clean coal power plants” that already have CCS technology…a bit of a rare beast here in the US. This may be good incentive for coal power plants to retrofit or build with new technology, but there are other ways to clean up power plants without the elusive carbon capture technology, and other ways to use CO2 than just “storing” it.

This kind of lackluster approach to CCS technology investment tells me that obtaining realistic programs at coal plants anytime soon, even in the next 20 years, seems optimistic.

Via CleanTech

Hits: 17093
Comments (2)Add Comment
0
...
written by Leslie, June 30, 2008
Typical pro talk here on CCS. Let's see someone bring all the facts about coal to www.sinai.org.il the table and discuss the problems of MINING the coal. The pollution, destruction and toxins which cause havoc on the land and buy viagra pills the popluations around mining sites puts coal right up there with oil in my books.

NOT WORTH IT! smilies/angry.gif
0
Good news, not bad
written by Tom Konrad, July 04, 2008
"Clean Coal" was never going to be economical, given the large energy requirements of CCS. The whole boondoggle deserved to be downscaled, so the www.enshift.com money could be spend on m ore plausible climate solutions.

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 

Are you an EcoGeek?

We've got to keep 7 billion people happy without destroying our planet. It's the biggest challenge we've ever faced....but we're taking it on. Are you with us?




The Most Popular Articles