I love the angle that
The move would provide an average of two CFLs per citizen, push back the need to add 60 MW of power, and costs about one tenth of setting up another power plant.
This initiative underscores the notion that we it’s not that we as a species need more energy, because we don’t – we need to use the energy we have more efficiently, and at the same time, find renewable ways to gather the energy that we do need.
We’ve just discussed the idea that it’s not the light bulbs themselves that make a difference; so while the exact move itself is interesting but relatively small time, combining this with a whole lot of consumer education about the need to make smarter decisions about energy use could make a real difference. Of course, the real difference would come with the
Via Reuters via TreeHugger; Photo via Steve Levi

written by Bandraginus, September 04, 2008
written by gianni, September 04, 2008
written by Clinch, September 06, 2008
Did they significantly reduce their energy consumption, or did it not go quite how they planned? (my guess is the latter).
And did they end up having to do some dam work after all?
written by Simon Hurst, October 16, 2008
written by Simon Hurst, October 16, 2008
www.emerald-monkey.com
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Recent Comment
Share
But it will be interesting to see if Panama comes close to saving as much energy through this as they predict they will.