I mean, if you're going to radically change the way a car is powered, you might as well radically change the way it looks too...right?
I guess that's what MDI (the company who has been pioneering, or at least attempting to pioneer, the compressed-air-powered car for the last 20 years) was thinking when they created the AirPod. I'm not getting any press releases in English, and my French is horrible, but from what I can tell, this new concept is going to roll off the production line in 2009.
The car will be powered by MDI's compressed air system, which uses electricity to compress huge amounts of air in small tanks. The air is then slowly released from the tanks, driving pistons that move the car. This system is hopefully going into American cars by 2010, and was licensed by Tata Motors for use in India and Europe.
The AirPod seats three (one facing backward) and the "playful and futuristic" design allows for an extremely light-weight and inexpensive vehicle. The top speed of the thing is just over 40 miles per hour and it has a range of only 130 miles before a refill is needed, so...obviously it will be just for city use.
Refilling an air car can be extremely quick (if you happen to have an aircar fueling station nearby) or quite slow (if you have to charge using an inexpensive home compressor.) But these cars are never dirty. Even if the power used to compress the air is pure-coal-fired power, these things are way cleaner than gasoline, and even cleaner than electric vehicles.
Why? Two reasons. First, their tiny city-specific design means that they're just going to be more efficient. But, second, the fact that the cars require no complicated, metal-filled batteries means that the environmental impact of construction is significantly lower.
Unfortunately, the trade-off is slow speeds and short ranges, which hopefully won't be too much of a detractor...at least in Europe, which is sure to be the AirPod's initial market.
Of course...I want one, but here in America we'll have to wait for the more expensive version that will (hopefully) go on sale in 2010.
Video of another Air Car below
Thanks to Bruno for the tip

written by Matthew Mogen, October 10, 2008
ZPM is planned to be the U.S. based distributor of the Air Car.
written by Hank, October 10, 2008
written by Ben, October 11, 2008
The standard version is actually a 4 seaters ( 3 adults and a child).
and It will cost you 1 euro for 200km , so round about 1.5$ for 130 miles!!
written by bbm, October 11, 2008
Before statements like that can be made, we would need to know the efficiency of the compression cycle (expansion should be pretty efficient). And you'd have to compare the car above to similar sized/designed electric cars.
If the overall efficiency (compression and re-expansion) is poor, then that above statement isn't going to prove accurate.
For example, why don't off grid solar arrays store extra power in compressed air instead of batteries, for example? Maybe too noisy, maybe too inefficient.
It is sure to be cheaper, however.
written by Darby, October 11, 2008
written by Yvelle, October 11, 2008
written by Yvelle, October 11, 2008
http://www.engineair.com.au/
written by bbm, October 12, 2008
written by Kyle, October 12, 2008
written by james jones, October 12, 2008
Capture the waste heat off the compressor and you'd have "free" domestic hot water and water for the old hot tub, pool.
you could also run a generator off compressed air, so if the power went out you'd have a backup.
Probably not as efficient as some other systems, but it uses off the shelf materials.
I'd trade efficiency for something i could buy at home depot tomorrow.
(well the compressor still probably has to hit 1000 psi or so, and my home depot is fresh out of 1000 psi compressors)
written by Nate, October 12, 2008
>Ok it sounds stupid, but 180 miles at 40mph would seem to me like more power than it would take to put compressed air in it's tanks.
Thermodynamics expert here. ;) Yes, of course it would take more *energy* to compress the air than you'd get out of it. Otherwise, it would be a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, and we'd all be fantastically less interested.
written by schmon, October 12, 2008
written by AustinTX, October 12, 2008
written by chris, October 12, 2008
written by Steven, October 13, 2008
written by doom*, October 13, 2008
when speed is low, the car run just on air.
when speed is high, a few quantity of fuel is added and speed is like normal cars and range exceed 1000 km.
More information about this here : http://www.mdi.lu/moteurs.php
written by Serge, October 13, 2008
written by George Lewis, October 13, 2008
If you search for the CAT (their really cool 3 seater)you'll see that they had a good design.
I hope there is enough backlash that this vehicle will never be produced.
If you want a REAL (freeway capable electric car) for just $20k, visit www.HiddenBuzz.com and search for "triac"
written by daves, October 13, 2008
Passenger heat and AC may be a bit of a problem for air powered cars.
written by Windy Miller, October 14, 2008
Swap a small scale windmill generator with an air compressor. Add a large storage tank.
Voila... major efficiency and cost improvement.
Only if you have a suitable site for wind.
written by hi, October 14, 2008
It weighs only 220 kg (!), has a power of only 4 kW and regenerative braking.
They don't say why they had to make it look like a piece of swiss cheese.
It looks like someone had the idea to make something like the Vélib, but with cars instead of bikes. I really doubt it is a good idea...
written by FuglyRides, October 14, 2008
written by Dana, October 14, 2008
http://greenhome.huddler.com/w...roduction
http://gas2.org/2008/09/11/air-cars-vs-electric-cars-vs-hybrids-which-are-greener/
I'm pretty sure the battery manufacturing is negligible in terms of environmental impact.
written by frisbee, October 16, 2008
Though I hate the new look, Id love to see this thing work ín our streets in Holland. I think it would indeed be much greener then speed comparable EV's since battery production and recycling is very energy and environmentaly intensive.
written by Murball, October 16, 2008
This car looks a lot cooler than the Canadian one. I really like the yellow one, it reminds me of a bubble bee. I want it!
written by mum-under-the-oak, October 17, 2008
(Although I confess I couldn't see anything in this picture or on their site that even hinted at the existence of gas, brakes, or steering. Maybe I'm missing something really obvious here?)
written by akineko, October 27, 2008
I really like it. good for daily use.
Since people don't drive that long distance like every day, I wish everyone just buy a new eco car for daily use, and keep their old car for a travel.
written by Pierre, February 05, 2009
No, it has a range of 20 miles...
written by AvgasStew, March 05, 2009
Now go blow up a balloon and tell me its better than a AA!
written by Julien, March 13, 2009
http://www.linternaute.com/auto/salons-mondial/photo/geneve-2009-les-photos-insolites-du-salon-de-geneve/l-airpod-la-voiture-du-futur.shtml
I want one and i think that the concept car is available soon!!
written by Roommates, June 08, 2009
written by Car Transportation, August 23, 2009
written by wholesale from china, October 13, 2009
written by rajni, October 15, 2009
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
OCT 10
"Furnished Properties offer a wide range of accommodation in Sydney, in..."
View all Comments