While the offshore wind potential of the U.S. exceeds they country's demand, we have yet to do anything to capture this resource. We've done a great job of letting oil rigs set up shop off the coast of the U.S., but when it comes to clean energy, we're lagging far behind the rest of the world.
A quick look at the map above will show you why offshore wind development is so desirable. Higher winds that blow year-round with no significant dips in production. It's a powerful (yet expensive to tap) resource, and it's also right next to where the power is needed. America's interior "wind belt" would require a huge new distribution network to get the power where it's needed. Most big cities are on the coasts, right next to areas with huge offshore wind power potential.
So yes, I'm embarrassed that we have lagged so far behind in this area. But I am quite happy that now we can learn from the mistakes of other countries, and utilize the best new technology for the offshore wind farms that we will no doubt begin building soon.
The Department of the Interior, under Obama, has a whole new level of excitement about offshore wind. A new report has identified 1000 gigawatts of wind capacity off the East Coast and 900 off the West. Plus a bunch more from the great lakes.
A lot of this capacity, around 20% is at 98 feet or shallower, which significantly reduces the costs of the installations.
So get ready to see a lot of offshore wind development in the U.S. in the next ten years...whether you like it or not. I, for one, like it very much.

written by David Foertsch, April 03, 2009
The responses I have received from my senators and representative make it plain that energy policy is not a high priority. I cannot identify a single major problem that has been resolved over the past 3-4 decades. Energy, Healthcare Reform, Social Security, Education, War on Drugs--all were with us then and are still with us now.
Wind energy--I agree with Heather--Dream on!
written by Boyd Bottorff, April 03, 2009
written by Bryan, April 03, 2009
written by Paul, April 03, 2009
written by Sam, April 03, 2009
written by Bob Wallace, April 03, 2009
The Cape wind farm is being redesigned so that it is further off shore and less visually disruptive. It is meeting less resistance.
We've got hundreds of oil rigs in hurricane country. We deal with it. And we drive our boats around them.
written by Ian, April 04, 2009
Anyways, these look dangerous I could see a boat going off course and running into one of these.
You are either joking or a complete idiot who I would never wish to be in a boat with - I seriously hope the latter for comic effect.
written by russ, April 04, 2009
The Chappaquiddick gap, the wind turbine gap, The Kennedy & Feinstein gap, (with both being against renewable energy in their backyard), the Chicago political honesty gap, the federal budget gap
written by Ben, April 04, 2009
Gordon Brown proved he couldn't care less the other day whilst (saving the world from the economical problem and trying to promote further growth). This was the greatest opportunity the world has had to do something about renewable energy and obama proved himself useless also.
Lots of the big farms in the UK have lost financial backing and the government doesn't care, there happy as long as the rich get richer. Maybe we will need to wait till an Al Gore arrives again or till problems start.
We do have one prominent green figure. Our future king, and the sooner he is king the better. Prince Charles held meetings at the G20 conference trying to persuade countries that global warming was a real problem, seems like they didn't listen.
written by Pam, April 05, 2009
written by Greg Steele, April 06, 2009
"Dr. Paul Sammarco was the team leader. He is a biologist and professor with the Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium. The project has been dubbed, “Rigs to reefs”. The point being that many of the rigs have been in the water so long, they have become prolific artificial reefs and have provided habitat to countless fish and marine life. Sammarco swung a finger along the horizon and said “This area at the mouth of the Mississippi is known as the ‘dead zone’. Nutrients from the river flow out here depleting oxygen from the water, coating the sea floor with a noxious mud. The rigs create a structure that can support marine life which would not have been possible without them”
also see http://www.sportfishingmag.com...52231.html
so if oil rigs do this think what an offshore wind farm will do.
can you say win-win with wind.
written by Bryan, April 06, 2009
written by Mike Westfield, April 06, 2009
written by Seamus Dubh, April 06, 2009
More and more every day we see any effort to change thing get bitched about as much as the things we are trying to change.
Complain about oil from the middle east, but you can't drill in the US.
Complain about high gas prices, can't drill in the US or build new refineries.
Make Ethanol from corn, prices of corn go up, now we're starving people.
People stop driving as much due to higher gas prices, tax revenue goes down, try and tax other thing to make up losses, people complain.
Wanna build solar farms or put in solar panels, can't because it would change the eco-system of a dessert or they are not the same color as everyone else's or we don't want the transmission lines going through this woodland area.
Build hydroelectric power, but don't make a dam, and don't put turbines in the rivers or tidal zones because it will kill fish.
And for wind mills.
We want wind mills, but not where they can actually generate sufficient amounts of energy because I live near there, or its killing migratory birds, or its causing bats lungs to explode.
It seems the no mater what we do to please these people it's never enough.
written by Boyd Bottorff, April 06, 2009
written by Kerinia Cusick, April 07, 2009
written by Ryan, April 09, 2009
Anyways, these look dangerous I could see a boat going off course and running into one of these.
Really? A wind farm is multiple stories tall and you can see it from far away. If someone crashes into it, it is because they are awful at using a boat.
I think we should get rid of beaches. Boats might run into them.
written by Tim, April 09, 2009
written by Buford, April 29, 2009
written by Uncle B, October 03, 2009
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Recent Comment
Share
You would think Ted Kenendy, uber-liberal, would endorse wind power. But not here! The proposed wind farm would be visible from his family manson; we surely can't have that!
I am eagerly awaiting the coming combat; liberal clean energy supporters doing battle with the liberal enviromentalist. These two groups are not one and the same.
Wind power and solar power will requite huge areas of land; the power transmission lines will require huge areas of land also.
Do you really think that the enviromentalist who wish to save every bug, every worm and every snake, are going to allow this amount of land use?
Dream on!