New Energy Star for TVs Calls for Better Efficiency, Smaller Sizes

energy-star-tv
The Energy Star for TVs standards were released on September 3 and manufacturers will need to up efficiency and keep sizes in check if they want the coveted label.

The Version 4 sticker, coming May 1, 2010, will require a 40 percent increase in efficiency over TVs sold today and the Version 5 sticker, coming May 2012, will require a 65 percent increase.  The new ratings will reflect the energy consumed when the TV is in "On Mode" as well as when it's off but downloading programming information.

The new versions pretty much take large TVs out of the running by requiring that any TVs over 50 inches meet the same "On Mode" requirements as a 50-inch one - 108 kW.  The cover letter to the technical specifications for the new standards made it clear that large TVs just aren't environmentally friendly.

"The issue in this case is what TV sizes can the federal government credibly designate as preferable from an energy and environmental perspective. This has become an important issue as the sizes of TVs and energy use continue to grow."

Making it harder to qualifty for the Energy Star label will hopefully drive up efficiency on all TV models.  TVs account for four percent of all households' electricity use in the U.S.  According to the EPA, there are 275 million TVs in use in the country, consuming 50 billion kWh per year - enough to power all the homes in the state of New York for a year.

via CNET

Hits: 3212
Comments (11)Add Comment
0
watts
written by James, September 11, 2009
I presume that is 108 watts? 108kW is enough to heat a house to sauna type levels in a few minutes.
0
No credibility here
written by John, September 11, 2009
How hard is it to check figures before posting an article?

Does the author of this article even understand electrical energy measurements at all?
0
And?
written by Carl, September 11, 2009
It's great that Energy Star is trying to push for more and more efficient TVs, but what's the point of basically making it to where big TVs won't be Energy Star certified? No one's going to buy a smaller TV just because it doesn't have the sticker on it. All this does is make it to where none of the bigger TVs are certified, which means people won't know which are more efficient and which aren't. It's counterproductive.
0
What about Nitrogen trifluoride in the production process?
written by Wouter, September 11, 2009
During the production of a LCD pennal there is emmision of Nitrogen trifluoride:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogen_trifluoride
This is a greenhouse gas with a very high GWP.

Does anyone know how this is handled during the production of this (and other) TV (/Monitor)?
0
108w Max?
written by EV, September 12, 2009
Another idiotic scheme for defining what is 'best'. The numbers should be based around screen area and not give a max power consumption.
0
There needs to be a limit
written by Mark, September 13, 2009
I agree it's a problem to not have *some* certification for larger TVs - but the fact is you can't just base it on Watts/screen area because it ends up just being green washing. Yes a 200 inch screen that uses 110 Watts is efficient - but it's still potentially a pretty big energy user. Part of the problem needs to be solved by more efficient technology, and some of it needs to be solved by behaviour changes.
0
...
written by Charlie K, September 16, 2009
Sounds like too much misdirected government intrusion. Govt decides big TV's are inefficient and pretty soon they will go the way of the incadescent lightbulb.

0
hmmmm...
written by ecogreen, September 16, 2009
First of all, a lot of people don't care about energy consumption. I do, but most people could care less. Second of all it wont matter if tv's are certified or not, in the end all of it will be powered with solar and wind. So it won't matter. Solar and wind power are way of the future. Energy stickers will mean nothing in the future because There will be no energy consumption. Sun and wind is FREE!
0
http://www.goodugg.co.uk
written by angelia110, September 29, 2009
Costs For Uggs--What It Costs?
-->Are you lusting after a few (or even more) Uggs (UGG Australia) boots and if so, you're in good company, as girls and women of all ages, especially with the simple, slipper-like design of these sheepskin ugg boots, which are relatively easy and very comfortable to wear. And they appear to be affected. Some men are also jumping on the trend and luxury UGGs? Australia, the brand also offers a range of contemporary styles for them.
-->Could you mind giving everyone loves from ugg-boots? There are so many types of uggs, ugg bailey button,ugg classic tall, ugg classic short, ugg classic cardy. How to choose your favorite? Or do you really want to one uggs regardless its style? Despite their design is awkward and slipper-lile, Uggs is one of the few stations that are of general interest, have argued that cross generational lines.
-->Young people, students and young mothers and the Middle Ages, the original Black Ultra Tall UGG Boots, seem pulled the fleecy-lined boots that are manufactured in Australia, with the best materials. Are you sure that your feet warm in winter without socks, and cool in summer so that is more versatile too? If no, hurry up to take one ugg boots on goodugg uk sale ! That's why we see people wear them in schools, supermarkets, on the slopes and even in the most popular beaches in the United States and abroad. Many surfers also use uggs to keep their feet warm.
-->What do you really care about? Is its price or quality, or you just following the general trend? You know what are you thinking in your heart!
0
How I love
written by likeugg.com, October 17, 2009
I love it so much!
Supra Indy NS Shoes
Supra Indy NS Silver Shoes
Unique Men's Lacoste R75 P2 Shoes
Supra Indy NS Black Red Shoes
0
...
written by http://wholesale4ebay.net, October 20, 2009
smilies/wink.gif

VERY GOOD!!!VERY COOL!!!

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 

Are you an EcoGeek?

We've got to keep 6 billion people happy without destroying our planet. It's the biggest challenge we've ever faced....but we're taking it on. Are you with us?