
The Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission has approved a power purchase plan for a wind farm off the coast of Block Island, clearing the way for more offshore wind in the U.S.
The commission has approved an agreement for National Grid, the state's largest utility, to purchase energy from the wind farm for 24.4 cents/kWh over 20 years. The utility has also agreed to purchase half of the power produced by the much larger Cape Wind project, at a lower rate of 18.7 cents/kWh.
The Block Island wind farm will be an eight-turbine pilot project that will include a transmission cable to connect it to the island and the mainland. The wind farm will provide most of the power for the island with excess power being fed to the mainland grid. The island has been relying on diesel generators for electricity, which are not only dirty, but expensive. This new wind farm will greatly reduce the cost of electricity for island residents.
Construction will begin late this year and completed in 2012.
After the Block Island project is installed, the state has plans for a larger, 100-turbine project in the Rhode Island Sound.
via Huffington Post

written by Mike Jones, August 13, 2010
written by Scott Brooks, August 16, 2010
written by JCT, August 17, 2010
Are you possibly just a little bit over-generalizing there? I know people who have wind generators on their property (small scale) and couldn't be happier. Then, you go on to say, "The people who approve" and say justifications why they approve.
So, in one post, you say no one approves and finish by saying some do. You can't have it both ways.
Obviously, you don't approve, which is fine. But, what's your alternative? Know anyone who likes having a coal power plant in their backyard? How bout a nuclear power plant? Given the options, wind seems pretty ok to me - but I have solar panels (something you'd likely think no one can possibly like either).
written by Jim, August 17, 2010
written by Emily, August 20, 2010
Also, currently, there are no off-shore wind farms in the US, so this would not be another, it would be the first, which is one of the reasons why it has been such a controversial issue.
It would be 6-8 turbines, depending on how things go with the legal procedures and which turbines Deep Water Wind decides to purchase.
I hope this project does actually happen, but the proper facts should be reported because we need to prove that off-shore wind is a realistic market in the United States.
written by Rex Chamberlin, September 14, 2010
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
AUG 12
"I am unemployed. I am first in line to fill out an application in orde..."
View all Comments