Priligy online now, save money

FEB 17

Recent Comment

"It's so sad to think that in the past 100 years or so, we have all bee..."

View all Comments

Life Cycle Cost of Coal Power in the U.S. - $500 Billion/Year

coal-cost
A new Harvard University study examines the life cycle cost of coal power including all the resulting environmental and tramadol 180 count cost health expenses and found that although the coal itself might be cheap, the price of generating power from it is not.  The study found that coal power actually costs the www.pereverges.cat U.S. somewhere between $345 billion and $500 billion each year.

The study says that if all of those expenses were included in people's electricity bills, it would double to triple the cost of coal power, adding $0.09 - $0.27 per kWh, making it no longer the cheapest source of cheap discount cialis electricity, but one of the most expensive.

Some of the hidden expenses outlined in the study are elevated rates of cancer and other diseases in coal-mining regions, environmental damage to those areas (including water and air pollution), loss of tourism dollars and costs related to climate change.

The full study titled "Full cost accounting for the life cycle of coal" will be published in the Annals of the New York Academy of overnight propecia Sciences soon.

via Reuters and Greenpeace

 

 

Hits: 16844
Comments (6)Add Comment
0
Economics at work
written by Chibinium, February 17, 2011
Given these facts, logically every customer would switch to green electricity since it's the cheapest to society. However, the concept of "externalities" throws a wrench in this. Until people clamor for it, power companies will not cater to it. People want cheap power.

To take this impulse out of people is the same as instituting a 100% estate tax to break the link between wealth and http://www.y-e-n.net/dose-cialis birth: it goes against ingrained instincts.

Quite frankly, I think more people have to die before society gets the overnight delivery cialis picture and wises up.
0
Go Solar, instead
written by Peter Haken, February 18, 2011
Look to the skies, why carnt the world use the sun...its there just there!!smilies/cool.gif
0
If!?
written by Steve, February 22, 2011
"If all of those expenses were included in peoples electricity bills..."

Are you kidding me!? Who do YOU think pays all those expenses?

Please use more common sense! You egg heads have no common sense. Many new energy technologies usually have no practical application because the people that develop it cannot see the world outside their four walls.

Lets make more electric cars! Everyone can come home from work, plug in their cars and save the planet. Yah!!

Except if 5M-10M people came home from work and plugged in their cars it would cause us to cheap cialis india build a thousand new power plants to handle this electric load. This would be coal power...more than what was needed WITHOUT electric cars.

Use your heads for crying out loud!!

Some of the stuff I read on this site is ridiculous!!

0
...
written by S.R. Morbley, February 23, 2011
The need to change to a new idea has never been easy.
Coal has been embedded in the industrial and economic
format of the developed world to where applying
new and alternate means of energy will be met with
too much resistance for immediate acceptance.
Therefore it be immediate. But it is eventual.
0
Use your heads?
written by Jim, February 23, 2011
Seriously Steve, you may wish to heed your own advice there. Electric Cars have never been proposed as a solution to coal use so I am struggling to only best offers levitra online shop follow your logic in refuting the vignovin.com science of this study with this particular nonsensical argument.

The study is spot on discount generic cialis in that the external costs of coal use go way beyond the costs of extraction and delivery. These costs are not reflected in the price of coal use however which leads to the illusion that coal is cheap. Driving a car without investing in maintenance is cheap too until it breaks down. Burning furniture and combine cialis and levitra the back porch are cheap ways to stay warm until you run out and have to replace them or go to war with your neighbor to get his.

By choosing to ignore the real costs of our fossil fuel addiction, we keep it artificially low compared to renewables that factor in those avoided costs upfront. This does nothing more than prolong the inevitable and leave us less prepared for the future.

Look at it another way, unless you think that your ancestors are busy percolating into crude oil and coal, these sources run out some day. In addition to where to get viagra cheap environmental and political security concerns, why wouldn't you want to tap energy sources which are numerous, available everywhere, benign and inexhaustible (the eventual destruction of we recommend buy cialis online pharmacy our sun notwithstanding)?

Through efficiency, wind, solar, geothermal and biomass, we have the technology to greatly reduce our use of fossil fuels and eventually eliminate them altogether. None is www.beverly.org perfect, but all are a step in the right direction toward an inevitable future need which cannot be met in a last-minute rush program when the click here cialis price in canada politics and female natural viagra environmental repercussions of our current energy strategy start to get REALLY ugly.
0
We've been paying for this all along..
written by Asaf Shalgi, February 25, 2011
It's so sad to think that in the past 100 years or so, we have all been paying a fortune for our own planet's destruction.

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 

Are you an EcoGeek?

We've got to keep 7 billion people happy without destroying our planet. It's the biggest challenge we've ever faced....but we're taking it on. Are you with us?




The Most Popular Articles