My electricity meter is about fifty years old, and it's likely that yours is too. Even if it's new, it probably uses the same ancient technology as mine. Those meters were created for a world with cheap, abundant power. Well, the world has changed...so why hasn't my electricity meter?
It turns out, that if all United States power companies were to upgrade to new electricity meters today, America would save roughly $35 billion in energy costs over twenty years and it would eliminate the need for around 625 power plants. How could something as simple as an electricity meter suck so bad?
The most significant (though not only) problem with old electricity meters is that they charge you the same amount no matter what time of day it is. Electric utilities must keep baseload power plants at full operating capacity constantly (see baseload power). At night, the coal keeps burning, but no one is awake to use the power. Then during peak hours, all electricity produced by large power plants is used. In fact, expensive and inefficient 'peaker plants' have to be turned on daily to meet demand.
But none of that matters to me. Running my dryer during the day costs exactly as much as running it at night. So why should I change?
This is why the great green state of California commissioned a study three years ago, in which they switched a few thousand Californians to a new kind of electricity meter that charged higher rates at peak hours and lower rates at off-peak times.
And now, the results are in. People with programmable thermostats decreased their peak power use by as much as 10%, and no consumers in the study didn't decrease their peak power use substantially. The Brattle Group recently got a hold of this data and they've done some economic analysis that knocked my socks off. Their report, which is where I got the statistics above, is shocking.
New meters that enable "dynamic pricing" programs would decrease the energy use of America by 5% minimum. If broader technology applications were put into place, such as in-home power plants, plug-in hybrid-to-grid technology and other so-called "peak shavers" we could decrease the electricity demand of America by 20% in 20 years!
On top of that, the program would eliminate the need for expensive peaker plants, reduce greenhouse emissions, and reduce or eliminate brownouts. More than that, though, i just makes sense that you'd pay more when demand is higher and supply lower. Isn't that how economics works? Apparently not when you let the snail-paced power companies lead the charge.
Via GreenBiz and The Brattle Group
Check out the full report from: The Power of Five Percent
-What is the Electranet-
-The EcoGeek Newsletter-
-Personal Power Plant-
written by mercutiom, June 28, 2007
Power is not wasted at night
written by Gary, June 28, 2007
written by Brian, June 28, 2007
written by Matt, June 29, 2007
Japan has it right
written by Leon, June 29, 2007
Electricity does not just dissipates...
written by Phil, June 29, 2007
written by Otto, June 29, 2007
Can not wait!
written by Bo 'Chrome Industry', June 29, 2007
snail-paced power companies??
written by Dave, June 30, 2007
written by Jeremt, June 30, 2007
Nothing new here
written by textibule, July 02, 2007
Check this US Carbon Footprint Map out
written by Fred, July 08, 2007
written by Matt Man, September 03, 2007
low price high quality pcb
written by lily, December 14, 2007
written by Tim, February 21, 2008
written by Debt Negotiation, March 19, 2008
There are new boilers that are being tes
written by club penguin, May 19, 2009
Seeking used meter for sub-unit
written by Ken Langdon, October 04, 2009
Alternative energy consutant
written by Rob Talbott, December 26, 2009
written by wart removal, March 27, 2011
written by how to copy games, April 01, 2011
|< Prev||Next >|