<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Windturbines for Carbon Sequestration</title>
		<description>Comments for Windturbines for Carbon Sequestration at http://www.ecogeek.org , comment 1 to 9 out of 9 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.ecogeek.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:28:42 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/wind-power/485#comment-8182</link>
			<description>How much the technology would cost, however, is not yet clear. Broecker says the largest cost associated with air-capture would arise from releasing the carbon dioxide from the capture material used and recycling any chemicals employed. - Canal boat holiday</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:42:08 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/wind-power/485#comment-6855</link>
			<description>Would these carbon turbines make up for the greenhouse gas effect and in time 'heal' the earth's climate and the ozone layer? Carlos [url=http://www.d1meba.org/
]Meba[/url]
 - Carlos</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:23:41 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/wind-power/485#comment-6825</link>
			<description>Yes, it is a wonderful idea but I don't think that those devices will manage to extract the CO2 from the atmosphere in a considerable way. I don't think that it will be even noticed by the rest of us. But this is just an opinion.I can't wait to see the first results. If it proves that I was wrong then I appologise for not having trusted them. ;D - Beneficial Association</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 04:06:29 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Have too much power.</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/wind-power/485#comment-5259</link>
			<description>This would be a great way to increase the amount of wind on the grid, because you would never have too much power. :) - physical access control</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 07:11:49 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Else?</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/wind-power/485#comment-3608</link>
			<description>I think there's better ways of using this carbon. Profitable ways! And without changing or charging anything or anyone. - ITPiMP</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:52:02 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Navy's been doing this for a long time</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/wind-power/485#comment-1761</link>
			<description>Navy Submarines use CO2 scrubbers and they work very well. In this case I would have to ask what the physical substrate could be used for after it would absorb no more CO2. Maybe the soda companies could extract it to carbonate their products? - Mike</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:42:28 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/wind-power/485#comment-1739</link>
			<description>I'm just not sure how we can beat trees at carbon sequestration. - Phil</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 08:19:07 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Makes sense</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/wind-power/485#comment-1738</link>
			<description>Wind power is cheap, but it has a problem with intermittency.  But getting carbon out of the atmosphere is not something that is time-sensitive (except on the scale of years), so cheap wind energy is a great way to poer any process for scrubbing carbon.  If you were also to hook the wind turbine to the grid, you could draw the power when the wind was blowing while it was needed, but use the wind to sequester carbon when you had sufficient electricity from other sources.  This would be a great way to increase the amount of wind on the grid, because you would never have too much power.  (as actually happend in Europe a month ago... there was so much wind that electricity was free on wholesale market.. they shut all the coal plants down because they were not needed.  This will happen a lot more often as wind penetration increases.) - Tom Konrad</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 06:24:12 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/wind-power/485#comment-1737</link>
			<description>Apparently the windmills compress the CO2, extract the oxygen atoms and discharge the carbon as pencils.  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D - rob</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 02:45:09 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
