Comments for Capping Emissions Would Cost 1% of GDP at http://www.ecogeek.org , comment 1 to 6 out of 6 comments http://www.ecogeek.org Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:38:05 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://www.ecogeek.org/preventing-pollution/1576#comment-20377 war gold   buy war gold    warhammer goldwarhammer gold   buy warhammer gold    war gold   warhammer gold   buy warhammer gold    war goldwarhammer gold   buy warhammer gold    war goldwarhammer gold   buy warhammer gold    war goldwarhammer gold   buy warhammer gold    war goldwarhammer gold   buy warhammer gold    war goldaoc gold   buy aoc gold    age of conan goldage of conan gold   buy age of conan gold    aoc goldwarhammer gold   warhammer online goldwarhammer online gold   warhammer online goldwarhammer gold   buy warhammer gold   war gold - warhammer gold Wed, 29 Oct 2008 02:08:28 +0100 http://www.ecogeek.org/preventing-pollution/1576#comment-12446 Better hang on to your wallet, folks. This ain't gonna be cheep, because, quite the contrary, it's gonna bankrupt America. Businesses are shutting down and others are moving overseas taking jobs with them. There'll be only a few taxpayers left to purchase carbon off-sets or pay the tax on greenhouse gas emissions. How does that happen, you ask? A decade ago Congress mandated the extraction of sulfur from diesel fuel by the year 2007, which doubled the price of diesel. You pay for that cost with your grocery bill just the same as if it were a tax increase. Now do you see how the cost of congressional mandates on industrial emissions comes out of your pocket? To read more, go to: http://wack-o.com/global/tax_hike.htm to read Paul Driessen's article Global Warming Tax Hikes Headed Your Way - Buck Redman Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:52:17 +0100 http://www.ecogeek.org/preventing-pollution/1576#comment-12429 I'm a college student cooping as an engineer for an oil refinery, and I'd like to tell you that in your picture all that is coming out of those stacks are water. The co2 is invisible. I agree on the issue, I recently got 37MPG out of my 28MPG EPA car by driving slower and turning my car off at red lights, but showing pictures of artificial clouds is sensationalism. - matt Sat, 26 Apr 2008 07:54:07 +0100 http://www.ecogeek.org/preventing-pollution/1576#comment-12427 [quote]They find that reducing global carbon emissions will cost just 1 percent of our GDP in 2030[/quote] You say reduce in CO2. By how much? That 1% GDP is still $260 Billion. And how is it supposed to work and not just have companies move factories overseas to China and India where CO2 and pollution would have a net increase due to the lax environmental laws there? - EV Sat, 26 Apr 2008 06:14:18 +0100 http://www.ecogeek.org/preventing-pollution/1576#comment-12417 a lot more later. It's like a band-aid. JUST RIP IT. - T Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:39:52 +0100 http://www.ecogeek.org/preventing-pollution/1576#comment-12415 With soaring gas and oil prices, why is the government waiting to make more fuel efficient machines. The investment of eco friendly alternative methods would offset the billions of dollars we are giving to the countries in the middle east, not to mention could help lead the way to help the environment. - joseph Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:03:15 +0100