<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Solar Powered E-Reader Makes E-Books Eco-Friendlier</title>
		<description>Comments for Solar Powered E-Reader Makes E-Books Eco-Friendlier at http://www.ecogeek.org , comment 1 to 17 out of 17 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.ecogeek.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:36:48 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Scale</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/computing-and-gadgets/2975-solar-powered-e-reader-makes-e-books-eco-friendlie#comment-31865</link>
			<description>A nice idea - the green credentials are a bit thin (the power savings are miniscule compared with having bread instead of taost for breakfast or driving an extra mile in your car.

The really exciting bit is accessibility in parts of the world with irregular power supplies (like most of rural Africa). Otherwise e-books are toys for effete Weterners - John Hardy</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:00:23 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>double</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/computing-and-gadgets/2975-solar-powered-e-reader-makes-e-books-eco-friendlie#comment-31676</link>
			<description>
That said in your calculations you should include the cost and energy used to transport books. Compare recent studies on  - tiffany and co</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:24:42 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/computing-and-gadgets/2975-solar-powered-e-reader-makes-e-books-eco-friendlie#comment-31659</link>
			<description>At any rate, solar power is still the way to go because it does no harm to the environment and is low-priced.
1. It won't require us to disturb ecological systems.
2. It requires the aid of the sun which, until it dies in the next, oh say, billion years, is limitless.
3. It's cool. Makes our homes look like robots but live like plants!
 - Richard</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:59:01 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>genuine ugg boots online</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/computing-and-gadgets/2975-solar-powered-e-reader-makes-e-books-eco-friendlie#comment-31618</link>
			<description>Buy Genuine UGG Boots Online from uggfoot Store,you can find the cheapest genuine ugg boots sale!Free Shipping Wordwide:UK,USA,Ireland...rose uggs,purple uggs,grey uggs,ugg ultra tall. - genuine ugg boots online</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 04:11:39 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Timberland Work Boots</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/computing-and-gadgets/2975-solar-powered-e-reader-makes-e-books-eco-friendlie#comment-31607</link>
			<description>Timberland Boots On Sale,free shipping!Hiking  boots -Timberland Work Boots for men and women,Timberland Shoes, your best  choice.Timberland  boots for sale Now! - Timberland Work Boots</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:54:08 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>christian louboutin shoes</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/computing-and-gadgets/2975-solar-powered-e-reader-makes-e-books-eco-friendlie#comment-31605</link>
			<description>Christian Louboutin Shoes 

Sale at Shoes Boots Stores London UK Including Christian 

Louboutin Wedding Shoes,Christian Louboutin Pumps,Christian Louboutin 

Boots and Christian Louboutin Sadals. Buy cheap 

Christian   Louboutin Pumps?

 in Shoesboots.co.uk,50% OFF,No Sale Tax! - christian louboutin shoes</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:52:34 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/computing-and-gadgets/2975-solar-powered-e-reader-makes-e-books-eco-friendlie#comment-31586</link>
			<description>At 9.6 percent efficient, it sounds like some pretty old technology is being used.  


 - eco-house</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:28:08 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/computing-and-gadgets/2975-solar-powered-e-reader-makes-e-books-eco-friendlie#comment-31528</link>
			<description>This e-book is a great idea.  It will save a lot of trees.  Go Green. - Anthony</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:43:51 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ugg classic boots</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/computing-and-gadgets/2975-solar-powered-e-reader-makes-e-books-eco-friendlie#comment-31507</link>
			<description>The image shows a Sony reader with e-ink display. I - UGG Bailey Button boots</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:40:41 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>@Piers</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/computing-and-gadgets/2975-solar-powered-e-reader-makes-e-books-eco-friendlie#comment-31489</link>
			<description>What kind of moron thinks that reading a website is the same as purchasing e-reader hardware? Piers that is who.

You obviously haven't had any higher education. - Roger</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:48:40 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>codswallop</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/computing-and-gadgets/2975-solar-powered-e-reader-makes-e-books-eco-friendlie#comment-31427</link>
			<description>Dear Roger, the fact that you are reading this magazine on line instead of buying a print copy rather negates your arguments!
Sure there is a place for beautifully produced books but I  won't mourn my pile of browning cheap paperbacks. I really see a role ror e-books for travelling, reference and magazines and the titles will presumably never 'go out of print'. - piers</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:04:51 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>define cods wallop</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/computing-and-gadgets/2975-solar-powered-e-reader-makes-e-books-eco-friendlie#comment-31414</link>
			<description>@Roger
I don't know why that would be a dumb and deceptive thing to suggest. The abstract of the report from the Cleantech Group that this blog is based on clearly states the reasons that eReaders are &quot;greener.&quot; The report seems to objectively analyze the entire lifecycle of the reader vs the book. Your point about manufacturing is understood, but you seem to have some whimsical idea about how paper media is produced and distributed. The report says that 125 million trees were harvested for 2008 printed newspapers and books, both of which could be replaced by eReaders. 
Your concerns about cost/barriers to ownership and content ownership seem valid, but irrelevant to the subject of &quot;are they greener.&quot; Those seem more like implementation issues rather than platform issues. If the Google Digital Library thing goes through in 2010, that could give people access to 5m to 6m books from around the world online, presumably available on eReaders. This could have some positive impacts on &quot;world cultural affairs&quot;. 
In summary, it seems pretty clear they are &quot;greener&quot; than books, but have some implementation issues that hopefully will be resolved in the next year or two. - Cam</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:44:00 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>What a load of cods wallop</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/computing-and-gadgets/2975-solar-powered-e-reader-makes-e-books-eco-friendlie#comment-31413</link>
			<description>E-Readers are not 'Greener' than books, what a dumb and deceptive thing to suggest.

Firstly, just like any other consumer electronics product they must be manufactured, and they must be disposed of when they inevitably fail.  Like all consumer electronics, there will always be a bigger and better version being produced to tempt the mindless consumer to upgrade.

Secondly, you never ever truly own the content of the e-reader. The licensor can revoke the material through the push of a button and your material will vaporize into the ether.

E-Readers are an attempt by corporations to get a monetary feed from peoples reading habits.

Paper books have stood the test of time, can be placed in libraries and shared with everyone (not just those who can afford to purchase a 'book reader').

Kill these devices. Do not buy one. These devices represent a very serious threat to world cultural affairs. - Roger</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:08:54 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/computing-and-gadgets/2975-solar-powered-e-reader-makes-e-books-eco-friendlie#comment-31410</link>
			<description>@ Canada Guy
Not everything is about carbon emissions.  I would have loved to have e-book versions of my text books from elementary through grad school.  Though I loved their content, I hated lugging them around.  Being able to digitally search for terms is also a great advantage.  We often sacrifice energy efficiency for convenience.

That said in your calculations you should include the cost and energy used to transport books.  Compare recent studies on the electronic delivery of music via the internet versus the energy used to manufacture and ship CDs.

More on topic, though, we should examine the energy used to manufacture that solar panel.  Unless you're going to be stuck on a deserted island, I don't see much purpose to it. - Doug</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:34:46 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/computing-and-gadgets/2975-solar-powered-e-reader-makes-e-books-eco-friendlie#comment-31408</link>
			<description>I'm guessing about 9 minutes on a 30watt bicycle generator would do the same thing as those 4.5 hours. Checkout rollergen.com - cke</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:34:01 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/computing-and-gadgets/2975-solar-powered-e-reader-makes-e-books-eco-friendlie#comment-31406</link>
			<description>The image shows a Sony reader with e-ink display.  I wouldn't leave my expensive electronic devices out to bake in the sun.  It would be more energy efficient and environmentally friendly to just charge the device from renewable power on the grid. - Doug</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:10:49 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Which is greener?</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/computing-and-gadgets/2975-solar-powered-e-reader-makes-e-books-eco-friendlie#comment-31405</link>
			<description>I wonder, has anyone done a study on energy use and carbon emissions for printed books versus e-readers?  It seems like e-readers would use more resources than books because of the components, even without considering their need for batteries which have to be charged.  A printed book can last 50 years or more.

I'm also curious if there are any similar studies about electronic picture frames, versus printed photos.
 - Canada Guy</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:08:28 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
