<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Exxon Develops Battery For Electric Cars. Wait...WHAT!?</title>
		<description>Comments for Exxon Develops Battery For Electric Cars. Wait...WHAT!? at http://www.ecogeek.org , comment 1 to 17 out of 17 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.ecogeek.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:38:08 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/power-storage/1180#comment-27962</link>
			<description>I can't help but think of IBM and the PC.  Didn't they develop a pathetic little computer hoping to ward off serious competition to their mid-size computers coming up from the low end?

Kind of like setting backfires.  - hark</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:26:12 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/power-storage/1180#comment-25562</link>
			<description>[i]&quot;Exxon is in the money making industry and electronics are a competitive market without huge profit margins compared to fossil fuels.&quot;[/i]


While it is amusing when people pull numbers &amp; ideas out of thin air, oil production has a generally moderate to low profit margin, certainly lower than consumer electronics in general.  Last I checked the oil industry at large hovers around 10%... Microsoft, on the other hand as a software company, hovers around 90%.

Further, I wanted to mention that *plastics* are not exclusively a &quot;petroleum&quot; product, but rather are made from all sorts of oils, including those synthesized from renewable sources like corn &amp; soybeans.

And while I'm tackling all the other silliness on here, to the cynic up at the top, go check snopes...   - Sean</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:19:47 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/power-storage/1180#comment-15751</link>
			<description>July 07, 2008
My suggestions for EVs and its infrastructure originated way back in the 1970s  check this site http://trillions.topcities.com/electriCar 
Its time for less talk...like in the old days..let's roll..!!!  er'' glide..!!! check this...it dates back
 to the 1960s
 http://trillions.topcities.com/dualmodemaglev.html

All the best...Jack Marchand 



 - jack marchand</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:41:08 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/power-storage/1180#comment-15744</link>
			<description>Tell Daimler-Benz to check this site;

http://trillions.topcities.com/electriCar - jack marchand</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 08:27:57 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The reason you are hearing so much about</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/power-storage/1180#comment-13512</link>
			<description>The reason you are hearing so much about this now is because a company has already started making LI batteries for cars in China.  They are rated to drive a car several hundred Kilometers and even a bus for a couple hundred K, and recharge in 10 minutes.  They are using nano-technology to make a supporting structure than can take the stress.  Same advantages as these batteries. - Denali</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 19:42:13 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Exxon was better without Mobil</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/power-storage/1180#comment-13098</link>
			<description>it is written - Pontiff</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 07:35:33 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>How to buy battery of electric cars?</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/power-storage/1180#comment-10899</link>
			<description> 
We going to orders electric cars, but we do not known the price and where we can buy the battery of elec-cars.Would you like to give us information?

Thanks - Nguyen Vu tan</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:11:45 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/power-storage/1180#comment-9953</link>
			<description>I read that Chevron owns the patent for the NiMh battery - alex ziady</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:56:03 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/power-storage/1180#comment-9756</link>
			<description>As has been mentioned before, Exxon is now in a postion to buy up patents relative to battery technology. In the seventies, when solar saw sunnier days, oil companies bought the rights to any and all significant patents.  The result: solar technology was squelched for decades.  Exxon's strategy will be no different here.  By now being the the battery business, they have positioned themselves to claim patents and develop such technologies slowly.  Very slowly. - Guy Perrault</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 07:24:39 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Destroy from Within, how to kill electri</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/power-storage/1180#comment-8440</link>
			<description>If you, as a corporation, hate something which is good and popular, the best way to nullify that thing is to pretend that you like it!
  Then you join the forces advancing that hateful thing and disrupt those forces from within. That's more effective than ignoring progress or fighting progress from without.
   Big oil does [b]NOT[/b] like battery-powered cars. When Exxon says it's hopping on the electric band wagon, you'd better circle those wagons and KEEP Exxon OUT! - Allen Meece</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 19:57:51 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>I think its just PR</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/power-storage/1180#comment-8324</link>
			<description>I just blogged about Chevron and their suprression/control of battery tech that could have hobbyists driving 200-300 mile EV's.  I think this is just PR. - Dax Desai</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 19:35:11 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Where's the profit...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/power-storage/1180#comment-7693</link>
			<description>Well, not mentioned here, but in the various press releases, is that the membrane is made of...

PLASTIC

Which can made from...

Petroleum.  

So, this may just be a natural part of researching where they can use their product to create profit.

And if it leads to better, safer batteries, all the better for the environment. - Keith_Indy</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:04:29 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/power-storage/1180#comment-7688</link>
			<description>Exxon is in the money making industry and electronics are a competitive market without huge profit margins compared to fossil fuels.

Don't trust them to point the way towards making us not dependent on spending a big part of our budget on energy products.  Trust them to redirect and buy up those that are trying to find the way. - Ryan</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:35:11 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GM's batteries</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/power-storage/1180#comment-7651</link>
			<description>[i]&quot;It will be interesting to see how these batteries stand up to the ones that GM is producing for its Volt electric vehicle&quot;[/i]

I believe GM is using batteries from A123 Sytems (the sponsors of the Killacycle) as opposed to producing their own. - Queeg</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:07:24 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/power-storage/1180#comment-7637</link>
			<description>Exxon isn't in the oil industry, they are in the Energy Industry.  They don't care how they make money so long as they do.  This is why you see them investing in various forms of energy, not just oil. - EV</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:47:31 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Call me a cynic....</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/power-storage/1180#comment-7631</link>
			<description>Call me a cynic, but I wonder how many battery technologies have been bought up and 'sat' on by the big oil suppliers? 

Energy is beginning to get scary - take away public money, and no private financiers on this side of the moon want to put their dough anywhere near nuclear power, oil looks scarily short in supply... and renewables... well, they make SO much sense the world is beginning to turn to the fact they are the only sensible option.

I wonder how many enabling-technologies we will see start to come out of the woodwork - any energy companies sitting on old patents for technology that will save the world, better start capitalising on the quickly - because at the speed of current innovation; they'll all soon be outdated! - Gavin D. J. Harper</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:53:30 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>is it safe?</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/power-storage/1180#comment-7628</link>
			<description>will that battery make explosion? just as the notebook battery problem? - johnisman</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:06:58 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

