<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>A Letter to the U.S. Coal Lobby: Why I Blocked Your Ad</title>
		<description>Comments for A Letter to the U.S. Coal Lobby: Why I Blocked Your Ad at http://www.ecogeek.org , comment 1 to 66 out of 20 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.ecogeek.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:46:05 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>when you lose your way</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/weird-stuff/1437#comment-12683</link>
			<description>The main thing in the life is the life .that mean evey one should have meaning for his life ,and every one should ask himself why am here (in this life )i dont knwo why i write this thing but its the time to leave .
 - ashraf</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 21:53:02 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Solar in Seattle</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/weird-stuff/1437#comment-11323</link>
			<description>&quot;I&quot; buy green power.  I've had have solar on my house for more than 15 years.  AND, I live in rainy Seattle!  We've got better solar access in Seattle than ANYWHERE in Germany, and Germany is the world's leader in installing PV.  The US once was the world's leader in every category of solar R&amp;D, patents, production, installation, export, etc.  Reagan killed solar in the US by eliminating the federal support solar once had.  The Coal industry continues to suck tax money into its coffers with the BS of 'clean coal', a technology that isn't producing a single watt hour of energy in a commercial setting today.  The billions siphoned off by the coal industry would be far better spent developing, encouraging, and INSTALLING solar and wind technologies that exist TODAY! - GoSolarNow</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 23:06:39 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Way to Stick it to Them</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/weird-stuff/1437#comment-11277</link>
			<description>I've had enough of this clean coal BS too. Unless we move beyond coal soon we are screwed.... - Clayton B. Cornell</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:05:25 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nice thought....but sophomoric in nature</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/weird-stuff/1437#comment-11267</link>
			<description>Well Hank, I don't like the outcome of coal use anymore than the next ecogeek or whatever you want to call yourself, but to think you can rid your life of its consequences is simply stupid. Industry will continue to on with it's use, for decades to come at least (as you said), with or without protest, with or without the government and their lame excuses for 'clean coal' and CO2S research.

And if you think coal use is bad now....well, you're in store for a surprise buddy! You think we're on the verge of improvement? That ship wont arrive for another three decades at least! Mark my words. And, when you think about it, a few decades is a lot of time; a few more decades of relentless coal burning might just be enough to teach us humans a lesson or two. 

Even considering the possibility of the U.S. cleaning up it's act, lets not forget about China and India - they'll MORE than compensate. So Hank, I suggest that you stop instilling a false sense of hope. I applaud what you do, but I believe a more realistic approach is more effective.  - Enoch</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 05:41:17 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/weird-stuff/1437#comment-11071</link>
			<description>Kudos! I usually roll w/ adblock but i've disabled it on your site so I can now see your ads... 
 :) - Bobby</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:57:22 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/weird-stuff/1437#comment-11047</link>
			<description>Beautifully stunning answer - Ricardo</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 04:04:45 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Here! Here!</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/weird-stuff/1437#comment-11018</link>
			<description>Well said and well done. - Bryan</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 13:40:45 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Desperate moves</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/weird-stuff/1437#comment-10972</link>
			<description>I agree overall. At the same time, letÃ‚Â´s keep some perspective. If anything we should feel sorry for some. I am sure if the coal businesses were displaced by solar/wind companies, that the coal workforce would more than gladly jump ships. If they donÃ‚Â´t currently, itÃ‚Â´s due to status quo, missinformation and lack of opportunity/convenience. The country had to rely on them for many years. They see their end in sight. Their marketing deparment is sweating. Look how desperate they are now, posting adds at Ecogeek!
 :) :)  :) :)  :) :)  :) :)  :) :)  :) :)  :) :)  - Andy Backer</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:28:19 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Thanks for the heads-up...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/weird-stuff/1437#comment-10970</link>
			<description>Hank, we're proactively blocking them on Green Living Ideas as well in case they decide to start trolling other sites looking for a new home for their ads. Appreciate the heads up, and the very right on sentiments you expressed in your letter.

Sean Daily
CEO/Editor-In-Chief
GreenLivingIdeas.com - Sean Daily</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:48:54 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/weird-stuff/1437#comment-10969</link>
			<description>LOL! I live within sight of a trio of coal power smokestacks in a state whose citizens have convicted me of a felony for growing a plant.  Apathy is a weapon that corporatists have used against our social development since the industrial revolution began.  Your website is part of the knowledge revolution that will reverse our suicidal consumerism and this is why I Laughed Out Loud for joy when I read your response to Big Brother Coal. Thanks HANK!

Chris J., Ames IA - CHRIS J</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:38:33 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>seriously</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/weird-stuff/1437#comment-10956</link>
			<description>This was just too great of a rant not to comment on.  I love renewable energy and hate coal so i found it awesome.  but...

Be real please, after going to school for power engineering and working the industry, we are not even close to being able to ditching coal power. The details take many years to learn, but i speak the truth.  Please do better homework or attend least 4 years of college before taking your soapbox next time. - anon</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:33:43 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/weird-stuff/1437#comment-10897</link>
			<description>Amen to that, Hank!  Eloquently stated. - Mark H</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:49:58 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ad revenue</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/weird-stuff/1437#comment-10893</link>
			<description>Hank - if you put the clean coal lobby's ads back on, I will not only view them repeatedly, but also click on them to generate views/clicks revenue for your website --and you can then do whatever you wish with the revenue, including donating it to worthy environmental causes. Wouldn't that be a principled gesture to at least take something back from those who have, for the longest time, profiteered enormously by raping our mother nature? - Robin Hood</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:04:58 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Swell</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/weird-stuff/1437#comment-10885</link>
			<description>Concise and appropriate polemic Hank, kudos.

Though it's spelt sulfur, or sulphur.   - David R. P. Morris</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:24:44 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ad revenue</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/weird-stuff/1437#comment-10881</link>
			<description>Not all ad-revenue. But certainly all pay-by-click ad-revenue, like Google Ads, for example. Lots of websites depend on this revenue to at least cover the hosting costs of the website.  - dude</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:49:32 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/weird-stuff/1437#comment-10868</link>
			<description>Damn! Hank  Sounds like you do not like the coal industry.  But maybe that's just me.  

I like your thinking but given all the different technologies blooming and so little money going to assist them, they're more than a couple of decades away from going by the way side.  

  - Mike</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:33:02 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>uh-hu</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/weird-stuff/1437#comment-10847</link>
			<description>go hank go! - nyceline</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:53:17 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Re: adblocking</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/weird-stuff/1437#comment-10839</link>
			<description>I thought adblockers just kept me from viewing ads...they prevent ad revenue, too?  Hmm. - Laedelas Greenleaf</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:04:34 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Great Article!</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/weird-stuff/1437#comment-10834</link>
			<description>I love this post, great work ecogeek! i wish more media sites did what you have done!
I posted this to digg.com
[url]http://digg.com/environment/A_letter_to_the_U_S_Coal_Lobby_from_Ecogeek_org[/url] - Jared</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:28:26 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>adblocking</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/weird-stuff/1437#comment-10829</link>
			<description>Really, adblocking your friendly blogger? How low can you go? Sheesh - dude</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:38:08 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
