Comments for A123 Finds a Dance Partner: Chrysler at http://www.ecogeek.org , comment 1 to 3 out of 3 comments http://www.ecogeek.org Thu, 23 May 2013 02:49:54 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://www.ecogeek.org/automobiles/2671#comment-25850 @Errol. Wrong. This website allows readers like me to keep my pulse on Green trends without the burden of unnecessary tech jargon. Go troll somewhere else. - Andrew Wed, 08 Apr 2009 10:42:59 +0100 http://www.ecogeek.org/automobiles/2671#comment-25826 @Andrew. This blog has little credibility, it is litte more than an advertisement farm. This blog does the green movement a disservice. - Errol Wed, 08 Apr 2009 06:51:32 +0100 http://www.ecogeek.org/automobiles/2671#comment-25807 The previous eco-geek article you linked to is about A123 not getting picked because they made cylindrical batteries versus LG's flat batteries; as such, "A123, if you recall, makes batteries that are flat, rather than cylindrical" is wrong. Also, I believe you meant "batteries" not "cars:" "which means that they will finally get to make cars for EVs." - andrew Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:53:03 +0100