<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Solar Lily Pads May Spring Up in Scotland</title>
		<description>Comments for Solar Lily Pads May Spring Up in Scotland at http://www.ecogeek.org , comment 1 to 7 out of 7 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.ecogeek.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 03:34:04 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/solar-power/1634#comment-13058</link>
			<description>they are pictured as far `downstream as the finnieston crane! that would make navigation difficult for the PS Waverley, the last clyde steamer, which berths right near there. - gerda</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 10:40:25 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/solar-power/1634#comment-13057</link>
			<description>Upon closer reading I see that the designers talk about slanted panel installation.  That isn't obvious from the illustration.  But, cranked up to 55  23?  That's a lot of wind resistance - think sailboat.

And they are talking about rotating the panels on a horizontal plane to track the sun during the day.  That's not the path the sun follows most of the year. - Bob Wallace</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 10:38:38 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/solar-power/1634#comment-13056</link>
			<description>they are pictured as far downstream as the finniestown crane! might make navigation a bit difficult for the PS Waverley which berths there.... - gerda</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 10:37:37 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>OK, well MAYBE</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/solar-power/1634#comment-13041</link>
			<description>These would be perfect for rivers where power plants are located. It would help offset the river heating from the power plants, plug right into existing power grid, and stave off power plant upsizing.  - spfl49</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:12:48 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>rationale</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/solar-power/1634#comment-13040</link>
			<description>Just because it's feasible doesn't make it decent. It wouldn't be bad to shade a river, but do it with trees along the bank. Solar belongs on a roof- who are these passersby that are in danger, spiderman?
Roofs are out of the way and out of sight. Often AC units or water towers are up on roofs- utilities- so why not solar?
Solar panels on rivers... hahaha. - steven montain</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 23:20:41 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/solar-power/1634#comment-13035</link>
			<description>Placing solar panels flat, especially at 55 degrees North, is just not a very effective way to harvest energy.

Look at all that available roof top space in the left hand picture.  You can put racks there, get a lot more energy per watt of panel, and not uglify the river.   - Bob Wallace</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:35:02 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/solar-power/1634#comment-13032</link>
			<description>[i]Solar thermal plants, which focus the sun's rays to create extreme heat in order to turn turbines, cannot be used in cities. Because of the extreme heat, and the danger of someone stumbling across (or into) one of them, they have to be carefully guarded and separated from passersby.[/i]

This is only true when you get near the focal point. The mirror sites themselves are barely over ambient sunlight temperatures, so in fact, you COULD do rooftop mirrors for a central solar thermal site in cities.
The problems with a rooftop model lie mainly in mirror maintenance, land owners, and several other nontechnical issues.  - Kieth Conner</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 17:11:47 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
