<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Incandescents May Not Become Obsolete After All</title>
		<description>Comments for Incandescents May Not Become Obsolete After All at http://www.ecogeek.org , comment 1 to 14 out of 14 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.ecogeek.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 09:07:19 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/efficiency/2794-incandescents-may-not-become-obsolete-after-all#comment-28074</link>
			<description>Considering regular bulbs, also remember they dont last as long is that going to be saving much - Fred</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:19:47 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/efficiency/2794-incandescents-may-not-become-obsolete-after-all#comment-27773</link>
			<description>The problem pointed out above is what it is about.......we want to use less energy for our lighting. Thus, laws should be limiting the amount of electrical power needed per unit of light. That way you don't block future developments.

In the real world politicians don't think up limits such as banning incandescents or limits on W/Lumens. Those are designed by lobbists, looking to create a bigger market for their product.


LED lights consume less active power, causing your electricity bill to decrease. Yet, alot of them have very poor power quality in order to produce them cheaply, causing increased losses further on in the electricity grid. - Marcel Geers</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 06:00:19 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/efficiency/2794-incandescents-may-not-become-obsolete-after-all#comment-27698</link>
			<description>&quot;A team of researchers have come up with a process that makes a 100-watt bulb consume less energy than a 60-watt bulb&quot;
how does a 100 watt bulb consume less than a 60-watt bulb? Am I missing something?  It wouldn't be a 100 watt bulb then would it? - Anonymous</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:06:41 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/efficiency/2794-incandescents-may-not-become-obsolete-after-all#comment-27629</link>
			<description>It would be hilarious if through new technology incandescents become more efficient than CFL.  Because of various laws it would require people to use less environmentally friendly bulbs.  ... one of the hazards of governments trying to pick winners with rapidly changing technology. - no one</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:06:47 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Step in the right direction.</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/efficiency/2794-incandescents-may-not-become-obsolete-after-all#comment-27627</link>
			<description>One of the main stumbling blocks to the sustainabilty movement has been that many people just don't want to change the way they do things or what they buy.  Some don't like the color of CFL's, others are concerned about the mercury they contain.  LED's are great, but they too have a way to go.  More efficient incandescent bulbs = a great step in the right direction. - Dan Bossenbroek</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:09:13 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/efficiency/2794-incandescents-may-not-become-obsolete-after-all#comment-27603</link>
			<description>What a lame article. LEDs are the way forward. - KenH</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:20:58 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Trade-Off</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/efficiency/2794-incandescents-may-not-become-obsolete-after-all#comment-27602</link>
			<description>I don't know.  Only half the power savings of a CFL, yes, but none of the mercury.  It doesn't sound like a CFL is necessarily the automatic winner.  I mean that mercury has got to add up at some point when people start throwing out their CFLs. - Kirsten</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:03:17 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/efficiency/2794-incandescents-may-not-become-obsolete-after-all#comment-27601</link>
			<description>I love the idea of a laser in my light bulb that also helps the environment. - lalibrarylady86</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:47:57 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/efficiency/2794-incandescents-may-not-become-obsolete-after-all#comment-27600</link>
			<description>I hope not, they are the only ones made in USA.  Have you read how to discard a CFL bulb if it breaks? scary. I sure won't buy anything else after I started noticing all my money was going to China.


http://ventobama.blogspot.com/  - mreagan</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:03:27 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ummm...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/efficiency/2794-incandescents-may-not-become-obsolete-after-all#comment-27598</link>
			<description>Last I checked, a 20W CFL would be bright enough to replace a 100W incandescent, so a 60W lasered incandescent isn't really that impressive... Also, I'm not so sure they'd be all that cheap, considering the technology involved in creating them. - Magnulus</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:49:02 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mercury?</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/efficiency/2794-incandescents-may-not-become-obsolete-after-all#comment-27594</link>
			<description>My main beefs with CFLs have been that (a) they do not fit interchangeably in all lamps that use incandescents, and (b) they contain mercury.  I presume these new incandescents would not contain mercury? - Kirsten</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:53:48 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/efficiency/2794-incandescents-may-not-become-obsolete-after-all#comment-27593</link>
			<description>Hm, I think you may need to rewrite this: &quot;The power of that minute burst of laser is equivalent to the entire grid of North America, yet the laser can be powered by a wall outlet&quot;

so it doesn't sound like the laser is defying the laws of physics :) - Zara</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:45:12 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/efficiency/2794-incandescents-may-not-become-obsolete-after-all#comment-27588</link>
			<description>Funny that, all of sudden with more efficient lighting that these bulbs are getting more efficient.  I love how that works.  Good riddance. - Jim</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:37:07 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>tooo late!</title>
			<link>http://www.ecogeek.org/efficiency/2794-incandescents-may-not-become-obsolete-after-all#comment-27587</link>
			<description>hey,hey, goodbye, 
walmart is selling led bulbs here. - bigspud</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:30:44 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
