|
Written by Hank Green
|
|
Thursday, 31 May 2007 |
I've just finished reading The Lazy Environmentalist by Josh Dorfman. While not every chapter was for me (babies and children?!) the book contains a gigantic amount of information on how to make good, informed, green decisions. Without condescension or guilt trips Dorfman lays down easy to digest information on how to live a cleaner greener life that isn't a big pain in the ass.
We recently had a chance to talk to Josh about his book, which you can get at Amazon.com
EcoGeek: What is a Lazy Environmentalist?
Josh Dorfman: Lazy Environmentalists are people who want to be environmentally
conscious, and will be, provided the choices are convenient and fit the way they
want to live. Deep inside there’s probably a lazy environmentalist in
just about all of us. After all, we live in the culture of convenience. The
expectation of convenience seems like it has become hardwired into our DNA
EG: What do you say to the "America Can't
Buy Its Way to Sustainability" argument?
JD: I’d say that I agree. But that doesn’t mean
we ought to disregard all the really cool green solutions presently available
to us to get us moving in a significantly greener direction. To really solve
climate change and other serious environmental challenges we’re going
to need a joint and massive effort from business, government, non-profit organizations,
and consumer-citizens. We are all responsible for our situation, and we all
have a role to play in achieving solutions.
EG: What, if anything, scares your pants off?
JD: The mindset that still thinks Hummers and McMansions are
a good idea. That and snakes.
EG: What
what gives you the energy to do this for a living?
JD: I like operating on the cutting-edge and “green”
is where the action is. “Green” is where the most innovation is
taking place across nearly every industry. “Green” is what’s
going to determine whether the 21st century is peaceful or chaotic. And there’s
no going back. We have to deal with what’s in front of us. That’s
the great challenge for every generation alive. What could be more exciting?
EG: EcoGeek
wasn't listed in the "Electronics Information" resources section...WTF?
JD: A big mistake that’s being rectified immediately
if not sooner. |
| | |
|
Written by Hank Green
|
|
Thursday, 31 May 2007 |
Well, we've got another solar powered bag, this one seems to be aimed at an upscale market. I suppose that's good, maybe it means that trendsetters are starting to find solar as sexy as I do.
Unfortunately Dunhill's Avorities Solar Panel Bag doesn't tell us very much about the panels. The bag is 38 x 27.5 x 12.5cm and has, y'know, lots of pockets, etc. But we have to guess on the power of the panels. From similar models, I'd say you aren't going to charge a laptop with those panels, just not enough surface area. But there's a good chance you could keep your phone, or iPod, or even iPhone permanently charged during daylight hours.
Via Engadget
|
|
|
Written by Hank Green
|
|
Thursday, 31 May 2007 |
If the 6
Watt Linutop is a Honda Insight - small, not much room or power, but efficient
- then the Enano E2, packing Intel
Core Duo technology, a DVD burner, up to 2GB of RAM and 160GB of storage, is the
Wrightspeed X1 of computing
- small, lightweight, quiet, energy efficient, and somewhat impractical. I love
that they are 70-80% more efficient than a regular desktop, weighing in at around
65 watts power consumption (vs. a typical 300 watt system). The only thing that
bugs me is that for the same price (they start at $650) you could get a laptop
similarly equipped, which would probably draw less power than one of these when
combined with a flat panel monitor. It has optional TV tuner and S-video out,
but if you're looking for a set-top box you're probably better off with an appleTV
for downloaded iTunes content or a linux box running MythTV
for DVR functionality - Vista is notoriously crippled when it comes to multimedia,
especially HD content. Lack of component or HDMI outputs make this a non-issue,
though.
An Energy Star partner, Enano Computers envisions themselves as pioneers and revolutionaries:
"Our vision is to provide viable energy efficient alternatives to traditional computer systems. E2s are the latest energy-efficient computer designed for our evolving planet. Our sole mission is to make a real, honest and lasting difference in how people around the world use computer energy."
All in all this is a sweet little machine. If you're running Vista and space is your number one concern (vendors, executives, and astronauts: take note) this little PC, highly reminiscent of the Mac Mini, may be the greenest option available. It's Energy Star compliant, and it's made from highly recyclable materials.
via NYTimes.com |
|
|
Written by Hank Green
|
|
Wednesday, 30 May 2007 |
The EPA has changed the way it calculates mileage in vehicles in America. The result? Some pretty drastic changes.
Mileage for the Prius has dropped from 60/51 mpg city/hwy all the way to 48/45 mpg while the Honda Civic hybrid dropped from 49/51 mpg to 40/45. The change reflects the difference in testing environments, of course, but Sam Abuelsamid at AutoBlogGreen reports that there could be another reason there was such a significant drop.
Hybrid cars can be tuned to perform well in specific environments. They are largely computer controlled, and how the hybrid drive train operates is up to the engineers that create the car. Abuelsamid speculates that engineers at Honda and Toyota tweaked the computer control specifically for the EPA test. The result was inflated mileage and decreased real-world efficiency.
Seems more like something American automakers would do? Apparently not, the Ford Escape Hybrid only dropped from 36/31 to 31/29.
Via AutoBlogGreen
|
|
|
Written by Hank Green
|
|
Wednesday, 30 May 2007 |
Just wanted to share these charming sentiments from the EcoGeek cupcake at NatalieDee.com
|
|
|
Written by Hank Green
|
|
Wednesday, 30 May 2007 |
I'm not sure if I can really support this. It seems like there's something evil about completely removing agriculture from the environment. I mean, agriculture is already extremely unnatural, especially the way industrialized countries do it, but this is just nuts!
The people at Organitech have been creating systems to create leafy vegetables in fairly sterile hydroponic greenhouses for some time. The plants grow extremely quickly, are entirely free from pests (and dirt) and almost all of the harvesting is done by robots, so there are no labor costs.
But now Organitech is looking to remove that last vestiage of nature...the sun. They're thinking of turning the hundreds of thousands of discarded shipping containers that are too cheap to ship back to China into organic farms. The shipping containers could be filled with racks of hydroponically grown, pesticide-free, disease-free, low-water-using plants all controlled robotically for optimal yield.
The containers could then be stacked creating, in essence, vertical farms that would have a per acre yield of thousands of times more than conventional farms.
The container farms could be distributed throughout the world, and would produce food from Siberia to the Sahara as long as they were plugged in. This would signficantly reduce transportation consts, and make communities much less susceptible to global markets and climate change.
So I think I'm coming down on the side of good, though I will admit that I don't want my species to be any more separate from the natural environment than we already are.
For more on Organitech, check out this awesome video (turn down the voice track and you could totally rave to it.)
Via Wired
|
|
|
Written by Hank Green
|
|
Wednesday, 30 May 2007 |
The Corporate Climate Response conference has it's own informative liveblog for the event. So far, the coverage has been fantastic with video interviews with businesses large and small and some excellent stories on what's going on.
The Corporate Climate Response conference is basically an gathering of companies who are taking the lead on the climate crisis. I wish I could be there myself, but this constantly updated liveblog is certainly the next best thing.
|
|
|
Written by Hank Green
|
|
Wednesday, 30 May 2007 |
A while back, EcoGeek's Matt James asked Dell if they were looking to incorporate ultra-efficient, 80 Plus power supplies in their PCs. Dell said yes, and they weren't lying.
80 Plus power supplies are at least 80% efficient at any level of drain. Normal power supplies can vary from 90% efficient at low drain to 60% at high drain. This means that up to 40% of poweris being lost before it even gets to your computer's components!
While these new power supplies are a bit more expensive, they'll almost certainly pay for themselves over the life of the machine. Dell has opted to include the 80 Plus power supplies in corporate models (the Optifast 740 and 745) but promise that they will be appearing in more models soon. I asked them if they'd be in the low-end models appearing soon on Wal-Mart shelves, but they aren't commenting on that yet. The PCs will also be loaded with energy-saving software and default settings.
Dell also just announced that they will are pleased they'll be meeting the EPAs new Energy Star 4.0 efficiency standards signficantly before they go into effect. It makes me wonder if maybe the standards aren't strict enough.
But it's good to know Dell is continuing its commitment to being on the forefront of environmental computing.
|
|
|
Written by Hank Green
|
|
Tuesday, 29 May 2007 |
We publish an astonishing amount of good news here at EcoGeek.org. When I started this all up a year ago, good news was pretty hard to come by. But now it just flows in. The future's so bright, I've got to wear photovoltaic clothing.
But there are some dark spots. One in particular looks like it could undo a lot of the work done in the last few years. It's a dark spot that I've seen jaunting merrily across the screen on Grist and TreeHugger, a smudge supported by Barack Obama and myriad congressional Democrats: Coal.
For the last few years energy independence and the green movement have almost become synonymous. But coal threatens to break down that synergy. While recent forward progress that has been astonishing, coal is providing an opportunity for the United States to stagnate once again.
The technology to convert coal to liquid fuel has existed since the 1920s. If congress were to mandate and fund its implementation America would begin to slowly gain energy independence, Peabody Coal's net worth would increase tenfold to roughly $3.6 trillion, the Appalachian Mountains would be destroyed and U.S. carbon emissions would double. This is a bad idea.
Unfortunately, there's a bill working through congress right now that would give coal companies billions of dollars to help them build coal-to-liquid plants. It would guarantee coal companies government contracts, including a $40-billion, 25-year deal with the air force. Peabody coal is literally fighting for trillions of dollars here.
At the same time, there are also bills in congress that would cap CO2 emissions and make coal-to-liquid technologies instantly obsolete. But there's not a lot of money behind the carbon neutral lobby, while Coal has millions to spend on congress. The unfortunate truth is, this bill has a chance of passing. For more in depth analysis, you can refer to the New York Times, as they've just done a marvelous write-up of the situation.
This could be bad news. This could be very bad news. We have been making some marvelous steps forward in the last few years. A large-scale conversion to liquid coal would a reversion, the exact opposite of what we need to be doing.
I invite everyone to check out ILoveMountains.org, and to consider Illinois Senator Obama's position on "clean coal." Hillary may not be an EcoGeek, but at least she doesn't go around pretending like Coal can be good for the environment.
|
|
|
Written by Hank Green
|
|
Tuesday, 29 May 2007 |
CNET has some excellent, brief and enjoyable coverage of the China Beijing International High Tech Expo. CNET has focused on technologies that promise to green Beijing. China seems to be taking this challenge seriously, with one of the major deadlines being next year's olympic games. Beijing may be one of the dirtiest cities in the world, but they've got a lot of brains working to change that.
Featured on CNET are innovations from "grasscrete," an "environmentally sustainable alternative paving system," to a 300 mph maglev train (both pictured above.)
Not pictured include extremely efficient renewable energy heating stoves, and a couple of good looking electric vehicles (a scooter and a bike) both powered by non-toxic lithium ion batteries.
China's response to the environmental crisis is extremely important and, for the moment anyway, it looks encouraging. |
|
|
Written by Bob Ewing
|
|
Tuesday, 29 May 2007 |
Product branding creates instant recognition. When consumers have a brand lodged in their consciousness, the odds increase that this product that will be selected and purchased. Consumers are drawn to the familiar even if it is now a glass and not a bottle.
Companies spend big bucks developing brand recognition. Beverage companies are no exception.
Green Glass is converting empty, discarded bottles into elegant glassware. They began operation in Johannesburg, South Africa and have established a North American manufacturing facility in Central Wisconsin.
Green Glass recycles glass bottles so that they retain the original image and the consumer can connect with the product. Each glass retains the original shape and contour of the product. This presents shoppers with an image they will immediately recognize.
"They're functional, so people will pick them up several times a day for years to come," Penrith said. "The glasses also connote a positive corporate commitment to environmental stewardship."
DuPont, BMW, Microsoft, Smith Kline Beecham, Perrier Group of America, John Deere, Wells Fargo, Ford, Minolta, Valpre Spring Water, South African Breweries and Seattle Coffee Co are all Green Glass customers.
No market for recycled glass eh? Green Glass demonstrates that this is not a valid point; they are tapping into an environmental demand to reduce the amount of waste that we send to the landfill, and creating an attractive product while doing so.
Source: Green Glass |
|
|
Written by Matt James
|
|
Monday, 28 May 2007 |
If somebody tells you that adding a little bit of water to your engine can get you 40% better mileage, they're probably blowing a lot of hot air. If Bruce Crower, winner of the 2007 Popular Science Invention Award tells you it's possible, be prepared to be blown away.
In today's gasoline and diesel engines, the four strokes of the piston - intake of air, compression of the air/fuel mixture, combustion of fuel, and exhaust of the resulting fumes - generates temperatures above 1500°F. Crower's new engine design harnesses this otherwise wasted heat by injecting water onto the blazing hot piston. The water instantly vaporizes and expands in volume 1,600 times to power the piston through another two strokes. The resulting steam is then recaptured and fed through a condenser to be used again. Not only does this increase the amount of power produced by the engine by about 40%, it cools the engine as it operates, completely eliminating the need for a cooling system. No radiator, no coolant, no water pump... it could shave as much as 1000 lbs off the weight of semi-truck engines.
Best of all, the technology could be used in any kind of internal combustion engine. Gasoline, hybrid, series hybrid, biodiesel, and it would always save huge amounts of fuel.
No word yet on when we might see this in passenger cars, but the designer's credentials and a working prototype mean it's not more than a few years off.
via Popular Science |
|
|
