{mosimage}
Honestly, I've considered doing this before, but placed it above my personal level of expertise. Someone, or a group of someone's in or around the University of Toronto has figured out how to hack the construction signs and is using them for environmental messages. Not only the ones shown here proclaiming “Don't Drive” and “Take Your SUV Back to Detroit” but also advertising a campus event on sustainability.
I'm impressed. Rumor has it that a campus activist group, Cars Off Campus, is responsible. But I sure hope no one gets in trouble for that rumor.
Check out this Movie of the signs in action.
Via TreeHugger and Spacing
Photos and Movie by Kevin Braken

written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
It is a very nice form of eco-activism.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
These guys, if caught, will be employee of the FBI one day... lol because they are good..
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
I'm all for not everyone and their 80 year old grandma NOT driving a 5 MPG vehicle, but advocating getting rid os cars is just dumb. I would say it is definitely some idealistic college student that hasn't spent time in the real world.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
Terrorists?
Get a life and stop taking everything so seriously. You make the U.S. look bad.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
Second, these aren't necessarily construction signs. You'll find them located all over highways in Ontario, displaying everything from warnings about accidents/high winds to messages about not talking on your cell phone or tune to some radio station for traffic information.
Also, anyone saying that this is terrorism has serious issues and should seek counselling immediately.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
Yes, charging them as terrorists is waay over the top; but then again - this isn't just some harmless prank. People really could be injured or killed if they miss an important message. Might as well start replacing stopsigns with eco-propaganda.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
I'm sure there are still some of the orange signs to protect the workers.
Hurray for whoever did this!
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
I want to try this out.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
Nice job kids, good to see somebody hacking for a cause rather than a bank account.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
1) congestion ahead (some of us don't live on a prarie where you can see 10 miles ahead. I like to know when traffic is stopped around the curve and I'm doing 70)
2) An accident ahead.
3) Road closures (due to an accident or weather-related)
4) General traffic delays (so I can take an alternate route)
5) Amber alert
6) Workers ahead (nice to know, so I don't run one of those guys over)
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
A+ on the sign changes.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
To Above^^ You obviously have never come around a turn or over a hill and had people stopped in front of you. If you can't see the brake lights they don't help you. This COULD cause a seriously dangerous situation.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
I think this is probably coming from the same Digg-Bomber that's been jumping from Dugg site to dugg site callin' people 'terrorist's all day...
Most recent example?:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Apple/?p=170
Check out the 23rd response
to this recently Dugg Story (Apple Vs. Me) entitled:
"Apple going after corporate secrets terrorists like you"
Sheesh. Are you really THAT bored?
Grow up.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
Great move using it to mock those idiots.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
Is your life really that empty?
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
Personally, i think it's a great movement. If people in SUV"s get mad cuz they get 8 mpg and see the sign, that might spur them to say jeeeez...wtf am i doing driving this thing. That's the other option to the guy who said he'd be more likely to drive the SUV (which makes NO SENSE).
Get it together.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
As for those of you in the "who cares - if you need a road sign to drive safely then you can't drive" corner, please avoid the public infrastructure and take their advice - buy a bike. This way, the rest of us will be safe.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
Further more, "hippie group"? So wait, lemme get this straight...anyone caring about the environment and making a statement is a hippie? Mkay, so then, major car manufacturers making a statement on billboards on the side of the road, advertising the "GREAT NEW BENEFITS" their gas guzzler has...is a hippie?
It's amazing, the number of illogical and poorly formed arguments you get from people on this thing.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
from oxford:
vandalism: action involving deliberate DESTRUCTION of or DAMAGE to public or private property.
Face it, you've been pwned!
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
"What they did is illegal! I respect the rule of law, so i hope they fudge the law and prosecute them under non-applicable law just to satisfy my own misanthropic sadistic tendencies to detract from the awareness of my own sad, pathetic, empty existence as an idiot who can't even see the conflict in my first sentance and my second."
Imbecile.
love,
Spider Jerusalem
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
No, I do not agree with their choice of medium for activist messages (hey, if you really want a medium, buy ad space on a billboard and post there like everyone else), but come on -- terrorists?!? People, grow up, and pull your collective heads out of the grand canyon.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
"Why, I almost choked on my triple-double-latte whilst conversing with my broker on my cellphone while speeding too fast with one knee in a top-heavy waste of steel and plastic getting 9 gallons to the mile careening around the corner while swiping a hand at the kids yelling in the back - so your words on that electric sign clearly just aren't safe."
please. if any of you are those jackasses on America's Safe Highways playing pole-position, running lights, blowing stopsigns, cutting people off and yammering on your phones and speeding because getting there 5 minutes later is somehow beneath you - you don't have a damn thing to say.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
I'm a terrorist...
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
If a driver dies or kills someone because a road sign got changed to "dont drive", then they shouldnt have been on the road in the first place. The only road signs truely neccesary are permenant. Any other sign is not needed- any information given through a temporary sign is something you can realise using your eyes/brain or failing that, a radio.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
But realise that if there was no gasoline tomorrow, you would starve to death within a week.
You're still reliant on intensive farming and massive transportation networks to bring food to you, via fuel-burning trains, trucks and vans. Such a transportation network is *necessary* to support cities.
The only "true" environmentalists in this country are those working on their own farm and growing their own food - which probably means they're Amish.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
Plus, a lot of those signs are left idle near construction, the ones warning of accidents or traffic are permanent and overhead. I hope they wouldn't change an active sign regardless.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
They need to find a better way to send their message, or better yet, get a better message.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
So if anyone commits a crime these days, it is automatically 'terrorism'?!
Give me a break!
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
What a lame ass, thats all I have to say.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
As for consideration of this as terrorism or vandalism, pfffft. No harm done. Just had to get some city unionjzed(read:overpayed) 'tech' to come and re-enter text. And JUSTICE? in Toronto? HA! Tell that to the cops working for the mob or selling coke!!
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
They don't deserve ultra-severe "terrorism" penalties, but the penalty needs to be severe enough to deter other would-be vandals from attempting to gain unauthorized access to vital life safety systems of a city, which these signs are.
If I were a judge, well... on one hand, this is not something to lock people up for years and years over, on the other hand, you don't want people putting messages on these signs willy-nilly. My vote would be some jail and community service time, and deferred ddjudication, where this would not be a permanent entry on a criminal record.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
Technically it is terrorism.
They are changing signs that may be protecting the innocent from some danger. Seriously not cool.
You call them terrorists. By doing that, you demean every person who lost their life on 9/11. Terrorism is premeditated acts of TERROR designed to kill or injure. This is a harmless prank. The 'innocent' won't know that all the gawkers looking at the stalled car up ahead on the shoulder are slowing down traffic. I guess they'll have to resort to using their *GASP!* eyes!?! to see what's on the road ahead. Get a grip would ya? Technically, you're a melodramatist.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
The one responder had it right: Activisim should be smart, not cool.
Changing a road sign is dangerous (and plain stupid) stuff. All it takes is one person to think "Hey, let's change this sign" which results in an accident (or worse) for people's opinions to change.
I personally wouldn't want to be the person who gets hurt because of someone screwing around with road signs. You have to ask yourself: how would you feel if you were the innocent victim of an altered road sign?
Again, activism is good, but it has to be smart. Being 'cool' doesn't get the right message across.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
Hahahahaha.
Seriously though. Doesn't this just highlight what the new 'anti-terrism' laws are really being used for?
Giving government the power to make punishments arbitrarily punitive.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
Tom that's not the gearshift
Warning: there are cars in front of you.
Seriously roll the window down
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
Perhaps they actually rented that sign and used it legitamately.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
The guys who did this are the same as Hitler.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
Or the more plausibe yet still rediculus:
They are killing people because they couldn't tell when to slow down.
Seriously there is no way on earth anyone can justify a 15mpg vehicle for regular road base transport of >10 individuals. Most cars sold where I come from are 30+mpg.
Calling someone a terrorist because you disagree with their views is stupid and irresponsible, anyone that says otherwise is a complete and total moron.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
We can see as plain as day that you have some of George Dubya's blood in your veins, so why don't you just send the army to attack them!?!
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
If they want to display signs with thier own message then they should rent a sign for themselves.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
I wish to marry this person.
written by Guest, April 10, 2006
Heil Bush! Does someone have an American flag I can waive around?
;)
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
I garantee this was written by someone who has never been to Canada but believes what Rush Limbaugh tells them to believe. As a Canadian working in the US I can tell you my health care was better, and cheaper back home.
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
"arguing on the internet is like the special olympics...even if you win, you're still a retard."
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
Granted, the TTC is crowded and overcharges compared to other municipalities. But the subway is relatively fast.
Knowing how the signs are used to display messages regarding what lanes are slow moving, I don't think there's any conceivable danger to commuters. If it weren't for the likely illegality of this 'hack', I would say that these students were being quite clever.
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
Canada - a stern warning
USA - anything severe to do with guns, lawsuits or God - preferably all three..
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
Also, for those of you that think its completely possible to live off a bike or public transportation, try living somewhere thats not one of the main metro areas like NYC, LA, ATL, or Chicago... "Public Transportation" hahah yeah right, obviously you have never been to places like Memphis, Huntsville, Etc.... some of these places have bus and or light rail but they systems are so crapy they are only useful in the inner city... personally I prefer to live in areas where I dont have to worry about a crack head mugging my kids for their lunch money, or "Hoes" working the curb in front of my residence... These areas in most of "The South" do not have that luxary of a NYC Subway, Short distances to the store (closest store to my place 2+ Miles), Short Bikeable Distance to the office (12 Miles 1 way to the office) etc...
No I am not for the SUVs... People that drive those should just hand me their ATM card... I could spend the money they waste on fuel and put it to a much better user (like getting drunk at the local strip club and going to ${SOME_STORE} to buy bad B SciFi Movies...)
Its not the average Joe Schmucatelli that lives in the burbs fault we waste too much energy (ok well maybe it is), but I blame it more on the "Oil/Vehicle" complex that has screwed t he public over at every corner to keep us dependant on oil when the technology exists to greatly increase fuel economy (think 50miles/gal out of a 2.2L Diesel), Hydrogen Cars which are easy to retrofit, Gas/Electric Hybrids (There are reasons Frieght Trains run this mode other then power...) not to mention *GASP* Nuclear power... Yes I said it Nuclear Power...
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
This is clear because first the building in the back shows the location is the same as it was when I walked by it in daylights, and second the "bent" D in the first sign is the same default that was witnessed in the sign.
I cannot get the movie to work, but I think it would support my suspicions.
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
it stinks....clear out. end of thread. *phew*
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
I live in the suburbs, in rainy, rainy, Oregon, and I walk or bike everywhere. I love it. Last year, I worked in a factory on the outskirts of town, and I biked forty-five minutes both ways every day. If there's any traffic at all, biking doesn't take me much longer than driving. And I arrive everywhere energized, instead of tired with my ass asleep.
I understand why people are reluctant to drive less, but it's really not as hard as it seems. We all have the time to wade through these ridiculous Internet conversations, we complain about being out of shape and not getting outside enough, and we complain about the bitch of paying for gas, insurance, and maintenance.
So if anyone else out there would like to give up driving but is intimidated, I just want to encourage you to do it. Give it a try, even just for a month, and I think you'll be very surprised.
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
Switch on your spell checker you retard.
Go back to your liberal whining CNN, DemoKretin.
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
I found the default admin username and password on their website for a sign that was near my old house.
I logged into but nothing really to say on it. So i just put "Orange barrels!"
as we all know construction is common in michigan.
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
That said, nice hack guys!
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
High Chancellor: "On to phase two of my plan, Thoughtcrime."
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
Perhaps we should put American corporations on trial for "eco-terrorism".
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
Keep up with the rest of us now...
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
btw nice hack. I wonder If you can get it to display simple graphics.
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
considering that the sign was found and changed in a matter of a few hours, the only people who might have been hurt are those that died laughing at it.
and it's no more distracting then the TV billboards that litter toronto displaying clips of television shows/ads.
written by Guest, April 11, 2006
I don't think the general population of the United States would be comfortable with a big word such as inoperative. I think that would cause way many more accidents.
written by Guest, April 12, 2006
Arrested for this? haha this isn't USA. No judge here would hand them more them 20 hours of community service. Cheers!
written by Guest, April 12, 2006
written by Guest, April 12, 2006
written by Guest, April 12, 2006
written by Guest, April 12, 2006
written by Guest, April 12, 2006
written by Guest, April 12, 2006
written by Guest, April 13, 2006
written by Guest, April 13, 2006
written by Guest, April 14, 2006
written by Guest, April 14, 2006
That out of the way, I love how just about EVERYTHING is terrorism. I swear to God (or whatever you crazies worship) that tomorrow my sandwich will be terrorism.
Quit labeling everything as terrorism just for shock value or punishment. Leave the label of terrorist for the sick bastards crashing planes into our buildings and mailing anthrax through the postal service. This is vandalism with the potential for accidental homicide. Nothing more, but potentially much less.
Consider this sign I saw in February. It said, "Black History Month"...who is going to DIE if they don't read that message?
...bad enough we gave them the shortest month out of the year...If anything, THAT was terrorism.
written by Guest, April 14, 2006
written by Guest, April 14, 2006
written by Guest, April 15, 2006
On the other hand, I can rent one of these for a week from Mr. Superrent for one or two hundred bucks- and if I merely go look into renting one they'll show me how to program the damn thing; makes it all seem kinda pointless.
Finally, I'm pretty sure the U.S. and Canada are the only countries in the world with negative net air polution- why do we get all the hippies? :P
Now, if you want to do something impressive, go hack a digital billboard; its a hell of a lot harder to do, but you'd get a hell of a lot more attention, and noone might die because they didn't see the giant, flashing strip-club ad! :)
written by Guest, April 19, 2006
written by Guest, April 23, 2006
i know the people who did this. they are not terrorists nor did they hack into the signs nor are they part of "cars off campus". they rented the sign legitimately.
way to get all worked up about it though
written by Guest, April 30, 2006
written by Guest, May 12, 2006
written by Guest, May 12, 2006
written by a guest, May 16, 2006
written by a guest, July 08, 2006
written by a guest, July 08, 2006
written by JB, September 18, 2006
written by TheKhakinator, November 09, 2006
written by Guest, December 20, 2006
By driving envoromentally friendly cars you can get away with less blood per gallon. Please get some perspective.
written by M Willworty, March 25, 2007
Same selfish conservatives then are all gung-ho with their "support the troops" shit, "even if you don't agree with the war". Well, WTF should I? It's MY legal right to give my support to WHOMEVER I WANT! I don't OWE some person just because they've got some cushy government job in the military. Unless you blow up the prison which might be used to prevent MY free speech, you do are NOT fighting for my rights, no matter how much your drill seargent brain washes you with his/her political crap.
written by Blah Blah Blah, April 30, 2007
written by LUC1Fr, August 31, 2007
written by CableMan, November 24, 2007
The signs are there to protect the motorist and the construction workers that placed them there.
Why do you think the ministry of transportation and the ministry of labour have come up with these rules?
EVERY rule they make is a result of someone either a motorist or a worker losing his life.
If you mess with a sign, it caused an accident and someone loses his life over it, why shouldn't that person be procecuted? They are a direct cause of the accident aren't they?
written by Jay Sea, March 17, 2008
written by andy, April 03, 2008
written by phil, May 29, 2008
as far as terrorism goes? driving cars kills more people a year than terrorism does... so maybe this sign is warning us of something that is more dangerous than terrorism: our insane fossil fuel driven culture...
peace,
phil
written by christian, June 07, 2008
www.runescape.com
peace,
chris
written by Anon, July 14, 2008
written by Jeff, January 17, 2009
written by Oshkas, January 23, 2009
written by tom, February 03, 2009
written by Lucy, February 11, 2009
though yes it is dangerus !
but on the other hand if ur car runs at 10mpg !
u problay need some sence kicked into ur head!
and :O GEEE mate ur SUV runs at 8mpg !
I think u need a better car !
that kinda mileage must be costing
u like $20 a day to go to the supa mart !
even a dust cart has better mileage than that
everone knows you drive an SUV to make up for something !
i'd rather date a guy for his personality not his
"big car"
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Recent Comment
Share
In the US, I'd argue for prosecuting them under anti-terrorism laws too, so as to make the sentence harsher.