We don't know exactly what the folks at Nanosolar are up to, but they're impressing a lot of folks, and that's pretty exciting. They're definitely working on roll-to-roll printing of thin film CIGS solar cells, and they have been saying for ages that it'll be way cheaper than traditional silicon.
But, so far, we at EcoGeek haven't seen any proof of that decreased cost per watt. However, as they've recently attracted $100 M in funding from venture capital, and an additional $20 M grant from the US Department of Energy, we're willing to suppose that there's something up their sleeve.
The $20 M from the DOE is the largest grant being given out as part of the Solar America Initiative. Other awards were given to GE, SunPower and Others. But while Nanosolar is still working on becoming the leader of the pack, it'll come down to more than just funding. Nanosolar's technology is going to have to prove superior to other well-funded, thin-film manufacturers like Masole and Heliovolt.
Via Earth2Tech

written by Jeff Worth, October 11, 2007
The US is behind the curve when it comes to Solar however we have a unique ability to come up with creative solutions that are driven by private equity. Once an idea catches fire there is no other place in the world that can keep up with our pace of innovation and development.
The momentum is shifting. It should be fun to take part in this new industrial revolution of the 21st century.
written by Fredric Wiebe, January 01, 2008
written by Fredric Wiebe, January 01, 2008
Just as each different type of battery has its own voltage characteristics, based on the electromotive series, photovoltaic devices do also. A silicon solar cell is 1/2 volt. An entire roof would produce a lot of current at 1/2 volt or whatever the flexfilm material voltage is.
Instead, some kind of paneling will be needed to build the voltage to a useful level, and then the size of each paneling piece will determine the current relative to the capability of the materials used.
written by Noel Eberhardt, January 02, 2008
written by Deris Jeannette, January 02, 2008
Over half your bill is for heating air and the balance for heating water. Solar thermal, which includes forced air and water heating haven't gotten the attention they deserve because solar hot air (at 75-80% efficiency) only costs about $1 per usable watt to install, and water heating (at 30%) is about twice that. And you don't need to take out a second mortgage on your home to buy and install these panels because they are 1/7 the price and don't require government intervention. So while Solar PV is racing for the magic 20% efficiency mark, you already have the most efficient and least costly products available and ready to install that can keep you comfortable in you own home. Have a look at www.cleardomesolar.com. and do a search for solar forced air and water heating to learn more.
written by Murray Ceff, January 02, 2008
written by david marsalek, January 09, 2008
written by Mike Matthews, March 14, 2008
keep in mind that only 1/4 of your annual utility bills are paid to the electric power producers. Over half your bill is for heating air and the balance for heating water.
That's clearly not true here in Houston. My electric bill is easily 2-5 times as high as my gas bill year-round, except maybe 1 month in the winter when they're about even.
written by Uncle B, August 14, 2009
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Recent Comment
Share
Imagine every roof in all of New Mexico, Arizona, and Nevada made with this stuff. Being here in Seattle, they'd have to work on the efficiency for cloudy weather before I'd want to adopt it here. Anything is possible.
The video I watched was a Google Video showcasing Energy Conversion Devices. http://video.google.com/videop...5306582056