
We've talked oh so much about NanoSolar in the last year. Their technology has seemed promising, their government grants outstanding, and levels of commitment from smart investors exceptional. It seems like a recipe for success...but only if they could take it from the lab into a $100 million manufacturing plant.
Well, they've done it. The 200,000-square-foot factory is online and producing cells! And apparently, despite the initial costs, it's producing cells cheaper than anyone else can produce them. The secret is a new technique for printing solar panels. Instead of producing huge sheet of single-crystal silicon (extremely expensive) nanosolar actually prints a mixture of rare metals in an extremely thin layer on a substrate (in the beginning, a strip of aluminum).
The result are solar panels that are less efficient, but can be produced much more quickly and cheaply than silicon solar panels. The first batch of Nanosolar panels is destined for a solar power plant in Germany (where there are very progressive solar subsidies).
Already, Nanosolar says that they can sell panels for roughly $1 per watt, which will result in $2 per watt installations. Suddenly, that starts to look a lot like the $2.1 per watt that it costs to build a coal plant.
And that is extremely exciting news.
Via NYTimes

written by Free Thinker, December 19, 2007
Another massive on is in Berlin
written by Rob, December 20, 2007
written by Maheanuu Allain, December 20, 2007
written by RhapsodyInGlue, December 20, 2007
However, demand for solar is growing so quickly that it is outstripping supply, so prices for end users are unlikely to come down anytime soon. Just because someone CAN make something cheaply doesn't mean you can buy it at that price if others are willing to pay more. Check out solarbuzz.com to see that solar prices have increased in the past few years due to supply/demand issues.
written by weee, December 20, 2007
$1 per watt is very promising - especially as oil isn't going to get much cheaper and coal isn't going to get much cleaner...
written by Andy, December 20, 2007
I would definatley pay to get my roof hooked up with solar panels. The only advantage windfarms have is that they work equally well day or night with enough wind.
If countries are serious about going solar we need to be able to store excess power ready for use in peak times though.
Would using excess electricity to produce hydrogen for use in industrial fuel cells to turn by to electricity at peak times work?
written by Home Build Nut, December 20, 2007
written by Rob, December 20, 2007
written by chris brandow, December 20, 2007
if these prices turn out to be true then they are going to be selling them as fast as they make them for some time. I see a couple more plants in their near-term future. of course, their primary competitor is not the price of oil, but coal. and if they are anywhere near the price of coal-generated electricity, as they seem to be, then utilities and governments have tremendous incentive to create solar electricity plants rather than coal plants. And that is aside from global warming concerns.
written by Katie L., December 20, 2007
written by himi, December 20, 2007
written by Conrad, December 20, 2007
http://www.reuters.com/article...onmentNews
written by Orion, December 20, 2007
written by Mark R., December 21, 2007
http://www.news.com/8301-11128_3-9836003-54.html?tag=newsmap
written by Brandon R., December 26, 2007
written by gone solar, December 31, 2007
written by Sylvie LG Pollard, January 25, 2008
written by Technology Transfer Company, February 11, 2008
written by Red, March 12, 2008
written by mike, March 15, 2008
written by Jeffrey Coney, March 27, 2008
written by emilio castro, April 05, 2008
Gracias
written by Chris G, April 17, 2008
written by Krister, April 22, 2008
written by jeremy, July 01, 2008
written by Richard R. McIver, October 09, 2008
In 1950 it was $10,000/watt for PV electric
and extremely expensive now down to $2.00 to
$3.00/watt. By 2010 PV will be like the computer Internet and on every home with $1.00/watt projected to be the cost for thin film, infrared spectrem used, rising electrical power costs for steam power plants, and desire for clean air.
Conservation (skylites, florescent lights, LED lights, energy efficient refrigerators) and electrical storeage (SEMS and VRB technology) will also allow solar and wind to flurish.
Solar and wind will not make it unless you have conservation and storeage available.
Richard M.
written by Kevin Morgano, December 28, 2008
How's that solar plant in Germany going?
It's a shame we cannot find a place in this country for one. I know, cover New Mexico and see if you make enough power for Phoenix.
Time for a follow up story, or maybe something on 60 Minutes.
written by Shroomduke, May 10, 2009
As citizens of America we need to take back our Government, our Commons
Carter Tried To Stop Bush's Energy Disasters - 28 Years Ago
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0503-22.htm
General Motors' Destruction of California Transit Systems http://www.trainweb.org/mts/ctc/ctc06.html
ahhh I feel better now, I just had to rant a little. hope its not too much.
written by redneck, September 19, 2009
even us hillbilly's want cheaper energy,but I also want to have the right to drive a 500 hp chev. camaro to go look at solar panels if I choose to. Don't F--- up a good chat about solar cells by starting up about politics and ruin it for the 49 -51 percent of people that may not agree with your political view. Even a low life hard working redneck should not have to read your personal political views while trying to get informed on new solar tech.
Besides if you can show me one CONG. or SEN. in either party that is not filthy rich after getting elected within 4 yrs ill vote for that one anytime dont care what party!! unless he-she wants my guns
Good day written by Ken Whitmore, December 10, 2009
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Recent Comment
Share
cheers ;D