2007 is done, and with it came huge advances in materials, energy, architecture, transportation and more. But I though, before we take a look back, we'd take a look forward.
EcoGeek is here to keep you informed of the latest technologies that are making our lives better while also ensuring that we don't spoil the Earth at the same time. But just this once, let's look not at what's happening now, but at what's coming in the near future. Here are ten technologies that I can't wait for, and that I think we'll see (to varying degrees) in 2008.
Cellulosic Ethanol
While America maybe got a little bit over-excited by ethanol (to the tune of wasted subsidies and spikes in Mexico's food prices) there is a great future here. And while corn ethanol, it turns out, really isn't a very good idea, cellulosic ethanol is looking at a bright future. With huge bursts of funding both from federal subsidies and billionaire entrepreneurs like Vinod Khosla, we should expect advances on several fronts in 2008. First, techniques for producing the fuel from waste inexpensively will continue to emerge. Second, America's first cellulosic production plants will come online, while the benchmarks required by the recent US energy bill will spur investment in a new round of plants that will come online sometime after 2008.
LEDs
America's love affair with incandescent lights is over. Especially considering that they will be mostly illegal by 2012. So 2008 should be a year where Philips and GE get off their asses, start producing ultra-efficient LED lights in earnest. Already the technology is more efficient, longer-lasting and more user-friendly than CFLs or incandescents. The obstacle, it seems, is the price. But finally, Americans are getting used to the idea that paying more now will save you money in the long run. And as LEDs are a bit more approachable than CFLs, I think we'll see a good adoption rate for LED bulbs. Especially as I predict they'll start showing up on shelves in Wal-Marts and Home Depots in mid 2008.
No One Killed the Electric Car
2008 will be the year the EV came back to life. Tesla will make its first sales, the Chevy Volt production design will be released, while the first GM E-Flex drive trains will be driving around (in Chevy Malibu bodies.) Ford will begin marketing (though not selling) it's plug-in Escape and GM will begin selling the plug-in Saturn Vue. While smaller producers like Aptera and Phoenix will sell their EVs as well.
CDs Will Die
DVDs have a slightly longer lifespan, but physical media are on the way out. Everyone realizes now that there's no good reason to have a CD instead of an MP3. Frankly, it's more expensive and less convenient. And while other media (include books and movies) are going to have a longer road to obsolescence, everyone, including record companies and musicians, will agree that CDs have gone the way of the 8 track.
The Kindle will light a Very Small Fire
Speaking of obsolete physical objects, book readers will continue to advance in 2008, but they'll only just begin their journey to supremacy. That journey will be led by the Kindle which, though uglier, bulkier, and more expensive than the Sony Reader, is more well marketed and convenient than any other ebook reader ever has been.
Solar Really Will be Cheap
We've been hearing for years that "solar is going to be as cheap as coal." And while that prediction won't come true in 2008, solar will become extremely cheap. Nanolsolar and Heliovolt's printable solar cells will sell like hotcakes to large buyers, leaving you and me on a long waiting list for personal panels. So while the large solar plants will start springing up, distributed solar will be a bit further down the road than 2008.
There will be 30 Stories about Cars Running on Water
And each and every one of them will be erroneous.
Small Cars Will Win
While it's great that major car companies are creating cars like the Fit, the Mini and the Aveo, it's my opinion that they are completely underestimating the desire for small vehicles in American driveways. Which is why I think that the Loremo and the Aptera will be widely acclaimed in the US. Honda will continue selling every Fit it can build, but it will take entrants from outside the establishment to show how interested people are in less substantial cars. Additionally, the Aptera and the Loremo both will establish themselves as early favorites for the automotive X-Prize which will begin in early 2008.

written by kent beuchert, December 31, 2007
written by Jose, December 31, 2007
Note: I never knew EcoGeek was run by a member of Brotherhood 2.0 :P
written by xavi, December 31, 2007
written by Keith_Indy, December 31, 2007
Everyone realizes now that there's no good reason to have a CD instead of an MP3.
Except how do you actually OWN a song that's only on an MP3? How do you get another copy when your MP3 dies or it's memory becomes corrupted?
A CD or DVD is a permanent proof of ownership.
written by Keith_Indy, December 31, 2007
Result a 70 MPG diesel car available soon. http://www.popularmechanics.co...?series=19
While it's not the ultimate solution to our problems, it could be an important step in slowing down our dependency on oil, and decreasing our emissions.
written by Loki, December 31, 2007
written by David, December 31, 2007
written by Eric Boyd, December 31, 2007
written by Fox, December 31, 2007
written by Michelle, December 31, 2007
written by Meriam Uze, December 31, 2007
written by Stef, December 31, 2007
written by avagee, December 31, 2007
They do have small screens, but this lets them be ultra portable - you carry your phone with you everywhere - right?
For a while now I have been reading free books from http://www.booksinmyphone.com they give away classic books, you can install direct to the phone or via a PC. For me, for novels, the phone is a great reading experience.
written by kc, December 31, 2007
German company has just started selling solar panels at .90 cents a watt, this broke through the coal production cost for electricity and solar has become cheaper to produce then electricity then coal.
written by Dudes, December 31, 2007
written by blahblah, December 31, 2007
written by Val, December 31, 2007
Oh, I'm sure there weren't any temperature changes during any of that though.
written by RhapsodyInGlue, December 31, 2007
Granted there will be tremendous suffering within the human race and likely many lives lost... but people are far too mobile and adaptable (those with money) to ever go extinct.
Humanity has a test coming... a test of our collective morality. I suppose looking for an escape pod into space is one answer to that question.
written by k, December 31, 2007
written by Alex, December 31, 2007
What do you do when your CD becomes scratched, warped or even breaks? You should have backed it up to MP3, where it can be copied and reproduced in lossless codecs (320kbps is close enough, other formats can be true lossless).
"A CD or DVD is a permanent proof of ownership."
Really the only good thing about owning the actual CD or DVD is that you can look at the illustration. That is it. If you wanted a permanent proof of ownership, you might as well keep the receipt. I'm sure that you don't have all the receipts for all your products that you have at home, do you?
written by Bill, January 01, 2008
written by Pete, January 01, 2008
written by John, January 01, 2008
Just change the laws on entitlement programs so that if you want government assistance, you have to use government funded transportation. Really a no brainer that kills two birds with one stone!
Only people that have jobs to go to need private transportation. Ask any intelligent parent!
written by Jack Morrison, January 01, 2008
David Lassiter says on December 12th, 2007 at 6:12 pm
Kerry Beaauhrt also goes by the name Kent Beuchert and has beem paid extensively by the oil and gas lobbies to reject current electric car technologies. He posts usually in the first or second listing and works at a lobbying firm in Virgina. He has recently changed his name to continue receiving salary targets while trying to throw others off his efforts. Regards - David Lassiter
written by antigravity, January 01, 2008
http://www.gravitycontrol.org
capable of fuel-less propulsion, free energy, and more
written by Steve, January 01, 2008
written by PanPan, January 01, 2008
written by Fred_M, January 01, 2008
Now I'm not saying that MP3 should be an archival format -- for that, one should use lossless, but it is fine as an end-user playback medium.
written by J.C., January 01, 2008
No wait I take the bus at 6am then wait til 5pm to come home -
-much better
As for my government assistance - refund my SS and Medicare payments and I'll call it even - won't even charge interest.
Most metro areas Taxi service is a joke (several $ per mile) We used to have good bus service and even street cars - wonder how high taxes and/or fuel will need to be to bring them back?
written by Gary Schuetter, January 01, 2008
written by Cameron Probert, January 01, 2008
That said, there's one big thing that's keeping CDs alive and that's the transportability of digital media. I've heard a lot of complaints about switching a song file that you own from one device to another device (even if the original file is still working). That's the real problem with CDs versus mp3s. If they make a mp3 that I can have on my player and my computer and my other computer (that I purchased legally) at the same time then it will surpass the CD. Until that point, CDs are here to stay.
As far as books, eh.. it's a niche market as it is. And one of reasons why books haven't run into the same problems with digital transfer that music/movies/television all have, is because book-buyers like having a physical product. Unless the readers can really emulate a book, then I don't forsee books going anywhere. But this is all my completely uninformed opinion.
written by JB, January 01, 2008
written by Grey, January 01, 2008
A printed book is compact, light, easy to use, flexible, and tactile. Ebooks cost more, burn electricity, and make you scurry to find an outlet after their battery runs out halfway through your novel.
It's idiotic to say books are obsolete. It's like saying hammers, doors, sidewalks are outmoded. Hank has let his love of geekery overtake his common sense.
written by wesley bruce, January 01, 2008
In 1943, I lived in a rented apartment in Florida. Our electricity was obtained by solar lplates on the roof feeding batteries. Our landlord told me that he only needed to use electricityfrom the power company a few days a year.It saved him a great deal of money. Why was the technology not used further over the years? We certainly need it now.
Meriam can you get us a name, address and more details on how the cells worked? I knew there were solar thermoelectric (Seebeck effect) systems back then but solar cell are supposed to be 1946 not 1943. Photo-diodes are older but the cell your talking of is three years before the accepted fist unit and ten years before commercialisation. Wow.
If the things are still lying around some where, photos, documents anyting, they would be worth millions on the veteran energy market. In the dotcom boom dead server boards dating from the first experiments in Internet, university trash, sold for millions.
written by Mel Carroll, January 02, 2008
Electricity is a luxury and silly electronics only make sense in a world with lots of batteries and no room for books.
written by Paul, January 02, 2008
written by Ian, January 02, 2008
The subjects are good, the background research is questionable.
Anything to do with current audio or visual DATA Storage or Transfer is debatable. The end of CD's...No. It may now be old story stuff but it works & above all is a damn sight more reliable.
EV subjects. Have a look back between 1898 & 1930. Many EV's were running around. Thomas Edison was also big on this scene with his Alkaline Battery(not the type battery as we know it). Before prophesising, get your facts right before you look like an idiot, and we take you apart for it...
Now, the solar power stuff..RESEARCH !!! BEFORE opening your mouth and defining just as how much a fool that you are.
Truly a damn foolish entry into the world of Ecogeek.
written by Krishnaraj Rao, January 02, 2008
This principle is understood in a societal context as common decency, but is continually breached in our economy to such an extent that nobody even objects!
The easiest example is that of mineral water and soft-drink manufacturers, who sell a product that results in a consumer who usually discards a non-biodegradable PET bottle into the environment in an unregulated manner.
We should mobilize citizens to demand legislation that every manufacturer must repurchase/collect and recycle as many tonnes of raw material as he uses on a week-by-week basis. For example, if a mineral-water manufacturer uses ten tonnes of plastics per week to manufacture bottles, he MUST buy back ten tonnes of plastic scrap and safely recycle it. The same goes for automobile manufacturers, who must buy back that many tonnes of metals, plastics, glass etc. every week, and find ways to recycle them. The cost may be met by raising the market price of their product... but the responsibility to make the recycling activity happen MUST be fixed on the manufacturer of every product.
The same goes for manufacturers of tyres, batteries, plastic goods, newspapers, clothes, chemicals, auto-lubricant oils, etc. The list is long.
And if this makes some manufacturing and marketing processes unviable, it means that their economic activity was unviable in the first place, and was sustainable only by passing on hidden costs to the environment, to society, to consumers etc !
Many industrial activities are environmentally and socially subsidized to keep them economically profitable. Let us lobby governments to knock off that subsidy and see how many activities remain sustainable!
I propose peaceful demonstrations to remedy this
Small groups of citizens shall collect the branded packaging material of various manufacturers from the environment, and delivering them in large bundles every week to their corporate offices. It belongs to them, right? So let them have it back!
A peaceful demonstration like this, sustained over some weeks, would make a powerful statement. I think this will make a powerful media impact as well... and thereby, an impact on the consciousness of people.
What say? I would appreciate your detailed responses to this idea.
--
Warm Regards
Krish
http://globalwarming.rediffiland.com
http://friendlyghost.rediffiland.com
written by Ian, January 02, 2008
A way forward, a way for debate is the way. I apologise for shooting of the cuff.
Electric Vehicles..As pointed out, there were some advances made earlier last century with batteries. The Edison battery had some remarkable features. One of which was efficiency & robustness.
Solar Power..Anything here would be great. Has anyone looked into steam turbines using fluids heated by concentrated solar energy...Similar techniques used in (relatively simple) Nuclear power stations may be helpful.
Reduce your carbon footprint..Another way of saying, don't waste stuff. Another way to think of carbon footprint is; Reduce your waste and you will save money. Yes, you will. If you don't have to buy something that most of which you will throw out, you will save money..Think about it. Recycling or aiming for zero carbon footprint will actually cost LESS in the long run. Plus you'll still have a great planet to live on.
written by Brad, January 02, 2008
Great idea! I'm going to do just that. Collect Coke bottles, cans and cardboard into a box and mail it to Coca Cola Bottling Co. It'll cost me some to mail it, but you're right, it makes a point. I'll probably get it back, but then ensues the return-to-sender battle. Perhaps I'll include a short letter as well. Dear Coke, I enjoyed your products. I'm returning to you the parts I couldn't consume. Please recycle them and sell them back to me filled with goodness.
written by Hammo, January 02, 2008
I wonder if hemp could also be used as a cellulosic ethanol. In addition to it's other uses as food, for clothing, paper, oils, etc., it would seem a natural for cellulosic ethanol too.
Canada and many other countries grow hemp. Maybe it is time for the U.S. to consider allowing it.
Food for thought in the article: "George Washington’s whiskey distillery rebuilt; first president also grew hemp at Mount Vernon" (AmericanChronicle.com, October 11, 2006) at ...
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=14731
written by Virgil, January 02, 2008
Seriously, none of this is going to happen while the consumer is left to choose. Only when choices are removed or mandated by legislation (such as banning incandescent light bulbs) will the public do anything. It just requires a president with a pair of ba11s (yes, possibly even Hilary!) to level with the public about what a mess we're in. Changing to a longer than 4-year term of office might do the trick, to allow our leaders to focus on the long-term view instead of just getting into office and making enough money to get back in next time.
written by Dan, January 02, 2008
This, to me, is the key question.
Thank you.
written by Rob, January 02, 2008
written by Suburban Cuurmudgeon, January 02, 2008
written by Terri, January 02, 2008
written by JK, January 02, 2008
written by Keith_Indy, January 02, 2008
What do you do when your CD becomes scratched, warped or even breaks? You should have backed it up to MP3, where it can be copied and reproduced in lossless codecs (320kbps is close enough, other formats can be true lossless).
We do have an iPod, so most all our CDs have been transferred onto our computer, which I back up on DVDs. I think I've had 2 scratched music CDs in life. I've had 4 or 5 hard drives which have crapped out in the same time frame. I've lost work because of that, though I've often recovered much of my work from, you guessed it, CDs.
Another alternative to storing your CDs on a hard drive would be buying licenses for songs/albums that are kept on someone else's servers, much like the "on demand" cable programs. One could amass a large catalog and not have to worry about storage or damage. DVDs would also go the way of the Dodo, (or VHS tapes). The vendor keeps all purchase records and everyone is happy.
A possibility, but I think the consumer would loose out in the end (because the almost always do.)
written by Karsten, January 02, 2008
Karsten
--
http://www.polluteless.com
Practical (and independent) Advice to Pollute Less
written by robert jones, January 02, 2008
written by Joey, January 02, 2008
I was wondering... do you frequent NPR?
Joey
written by Tony, January 02, 2008
written by screenz, January 02, 2008
CDs are primarily storage devices, and as such, has a disadvantage due to their small storage capacity of under 1GIG. You can only fit so much data/music on them.
The reason why this will not last very long, is that portable harddrives, jump drives, mini SD etc, which are ballooning in size by the day, will eventually be the preferred mode of storage for all media types. this may already be the case. Benefits: they are smaller than a CD and have large capacities, they are fully compatible with nearly all file types, and any computer will recognize them. As for MP3s, you can carry these in whatever bit rate you want on this devices, and some will double as MP3 players, etc. Certainly there are other benefits....but i will end it here.
written by screenz, January 02, 2008
written by randomdude, January 02, 2008
written by bill, January 02, 2008
written by Robert White, January 03, 2008
written by VICB3, January 03, 2008
Solar, Leds, Electric Cars, Music on drives, etc. all make sense in certain contexts, and are absurd and or not quie there in others. And some are just threshold technologies. And some, unfortunately, are just frauds.
What works? What's the future? Simple: you just let the marketplace decide. Anyone who doesn't understand this simple fact is just a pie-in-the-sky leftist, fearful of his or her cravings, and in over-passioned thrawl to any one of the various "-isms" that are floating about, fashionable one day, forgotten the next.
Anyway, that's what I think
written by Wily Koyto, January 03, 2008
* lower cholesterol levels
* represent a pesticide-free alternative to the traditional white button mushroom
* are instrumental in the recycling of wood and agricultural by-products
* can easily be grown by everyone—outdoors in your garden or yard (mycological landscaping)—or indoors within greenhouses, solaria, or controlled environments.
http://fungi.com/front/intro/index.html
written by daqu40, January 03, 2008
Try this on for look in to the future. Americans (especially in rural areas and the west) in 2018 are still driving very large vehicles, but they are mostly electric battery powered and get hundreds of miles to a single charge. Who wouldn't want a vehicle that can carry them, their family and stuff and have no emissions to speak of.
See http://www.azonano.com/news.asp?newsID=5572 for a peek at how this might be possible.
written by KentB, January 03, 2008
>>Solar photovoltaic is an inferior technology regardles of the price, which is still exorbitant and impractical. Solar thermal is the only solar energy source worth bothering with.
Well, probably true that thermal energy is more abundant than electricity from panels. But what good is a lot of thermal energy? You can spin some turbines, but solar panels will have a place in technical applications and peak power generation even if they are inadequate to replace fossil fuels, etc. And there is plenty of room for cost reduction in the production of panels.
This web page is telling me that my comment is too short. I would think short comments are a good thing.
My other idea is to set up a hundred nuclear plants in Nevada at 1000 MW each to produce hydrogen on a grand scale for transportation uses. The funny part of the idea is that it would work. I wonder how much enery there is in the known uranium reserves compared to fossil fuels. In the 1950s the AEC claimed that electric power from nuclear reactors would be too cheap to bother metering. Now nuke plants cause huge rate increases. Gee that is weird. What went wrong with the original plan?
written by 3000 KILLED ON 911, January 03, 2008
TIME TO EXPOSE REAL ENEMY OF 911 DECEPTION
GOOGLE ZIONIST CRIMES....
written by Tony M, January 03, 2008
2) I DO like LED bulbs.Less heat,less power used.
3) I'll keep my CD's,DVD's and MP3.I game so I prefer DVD's
4)I'll keep my 97 Ford ranger 4 banger.Runs well and is ok on gas.If they make an engine that I can put in my truck then I convert.Till then,NO!
5) Wouldn't mind solar for my home! That'll stick it to the MAN!
written by joey, January 03, 2008
written by Lee, January 03, 2008
written by Borislav Trifonov, January 03, 2008
Cellulosic Ethanol -- it has been demonstrated that special algae in a big vat can produce ethanol at a density a couple of orders of magnitude higher than anything else that grows. This is the ethanol technology that should be getting the most attention.
LED Lights -- they're inefficient compared to fluorescents, let alone HID -- both of which are more common anyway. Their color is also significantly worse. It's easy to forget, listening to all the environmentalist propaganda, that the eye likes the continuous spectrum of sunlight, and only a filtered incandescent light (such as the Solux which is commonly used in museums, and my house) can duplicate that. All other light sources produce spiky spectrum, which affects the color of objects. This is why two lights which have the same color temperature can still produce significantly different appearance of objects. It's also been demonstrated in studies that true sunlight increases the productivity of humans, so it would follow that lights that match the sunlight spectrum are most effective.
I also want to bring to attention an additional point here that affects ALL household equipment: unless you are in a climate, or season where you are cooling your house by opening windows or having the heat on, ALL internal appliances are 100% efficient because inefficiency is energy expressed as "waste" heat, but all of that goes towards heating the house. If you're in a temperate or colder climate, for example, appliance inefficiency only really wastes energy in the summer.
Electric Cars -- where are you going to get enough copper to wind motors to replace all gas engines on the road? Not a chance.
Solar Panels -- by the time it pays for its production, it's not quite that cheap in terms of energy spent on manufacture vs energy produced. More important, you'd have to cover the planet in solar panels and wind mills to produce enough energy for unrestricted progress and the tenfold increase of energy use developing and undeveloped countries create as they become fully industrialized. Nuclear energy is the only practical source that can provide lots of energy in the long term (i.e. when you shut down all fossil fuel plants).
written by Borislav Trifonov, January 03, 2008
written by Steve, January 03, 2008
written by francis hatin, January 04, 2008
written by francis hatin, January 04, 2008
written by Bradley Olson, January 04, 2008
written by r.j.mehta, January 05, 2008
The amount of fossil fuel saved per person would be enormous !
written by Ben, January 05, 2008
ben.
written by Judyth, January 05, 2008
written by KJ, January 05, 2008
http://www.motherearthliving.c...33-1.html
CFL. The colours are better then a few years ago, but still have a problem with them blowing out long before the 8,000 hours. I have had bulbs blowing out in 1-3 months. Yes they save me on my monthly electric bill, but replacing them that quickly takes my savings away because of the replacement costs And they are useless as outdoor lights in cold Idaho. LED lights don't work outside in the cold either for like a house light over my door.
written by Wolf Kazumaru, January 06, 2008
written by Manas Rachh, January 06, 2008
I am coordinator of a student festival, Techfest which is the Annual International Science And Technology Festival of IIT Bombay, India. This
year in the festival we have a section dedicated to global warming. We also have a newsletter this year for which we wish to use your article for the
same. These newsletters will be distributed to all the students who come to the festival. Please grant us the permission for the same.
written by Travis, January 06, 2008
written by David ben-Avram, January 25, 2008
written by John Waiveris, February 20, 2008
1) Hybrid drivers drive more efficiently - partly because the fuel consumption graph can help them learn what consumes fuel.
2) Household energy monitors (ex: www.TheEnergyDetective.com) show where energy is wasted in places you don't expect.
A study in in England installed thousands of these devices for free and people consumed an average of 20% less. We put one in and dropped our monthly bill from $250 to $45 with almost no lifestyle change. (We already switched to CFL lights and any obvious improvements.)
3) We installed a furnace tracking device and learned that plasticing the windows (10$ fix) dropped our fuel usage from 65%. ($600/mo.!!) It was amazing to see the numbers change day to day as we made changes.
written by Joe Oravec, April 09, 2008
So, goodbye DVDs too. Also, camcorder videos can be converted. Software exist to convert audio media such as LPs, cassette tapes, 8-tracks, CDs, and others to digital format to be stored digitally like the video files spoken of above.
With cell phones, Mp3 players, blackberries, and other personal players, we can eliminate the need for disposeable media. As far as saving the planet is concerned. If you hug a tree too hard you may damage the bark. We can only do for the planet what is within our reach. We can not force China, Mexico, or other countries to elimate or reduce harmful waste from filling the air, water or land from those countries.
written by nick, September 08, 2008
written by dannielle, September 09, 2008
if any one wonts to talk about this plz drop me an email at \n This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it '> This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
written by Scythen Hade, March 28, 2009
written by wholesale from china, October 13, 2009
written by Dar Tamaddon, November 22, 2009
No wait I take the bus at 6am then wait til 5pm to come home -
-much better
written by Dar Tamaddon, November 22, 2009
No wait I take the bus at 6am then wait til 5pm to come home -
-much better
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
DEC 31
"Excellent points. All my lights are energy efficient. I feel good doin..."
View all Comments