We at EcoGeek are happy to announce that the folks at the Wall Street Journal have joined the environmental blogosphere with the eco-business blog "Environmental Capital." Previously, the WSJ had a similar blog covering only energy issues, which I was a pretty big fan of, but now they're relaunching, bigger and better.
EcoGeek and the WSJ have had, and will continue to have, our differences (for example, I'm not so sure about the "huge disagreement [as everyone knows] in the global warming debate" that they mention.) Actually, I think that's complete B.S. It's been about five years, in my opinion, since there was any "debate" at all. What we have now is pandering to people who only care about next quarter's numbers.
We're happy, at EcoGeek, to have moved on from any "debate" and toward solutions, which, in the end, are (quite literally) inifinitely more productive than debate.
But in any case, I welcome Environmental Capital to this space. Not as another member of the debate, but as a resource offering different kinds of solutions to a different, and very important, demographic.

written by Enrique, January 30, 2008
written by Matt, January 30, 2008
written by Tim, January 31, 2008
"Because...those two sides of the coin are inextricably tied. This is all about the environment but this is fundamentally a business story."
This assumption that there are only two sides to the environmental 'story' precludes the existence of other stories (race, poverty, religion, social equity...). There are manysides to this story, not just money and the environment.
written by johnny, January 31, 2008
written by George Vaccaro, January 31, 2008
Denying that there are many scientists that disagree with Al Gore's "consensus" view is - being in denial.
There should and will be for the foreseeable future a healthy debate about it, that is the scientific way - always shouting "consensus" is very unscientific at best, propagandist at worst.
written by lisa, June 13, 2008
i usually only use my credit line about once a month. now that the credit line has changed from $100 incriments to any amount i have been getting an excess amount of mail. they seem to send me a notice every single time i use my credit line, even if it is just $2. I think this is a horrible burden to the enviroment. this is way beyond NOT being eco-friendly. Associated bank is killing tons of trees sending out this many notices. I think the idea of deducting a smaller amount is fine, but perhaps sending mail out just once a week per customer or sending out a notice when the customer hits a certain dollar amount on the credit line.
I used $6.35 on my credit line and during this time i got 3 notices. The stamp cost alone is almost 1/3 of my deduction. And the amount of paper used is about one tree ring. I cannot believe my bank would be so nieve about the enviroment, especially this day in age where the eco and Green Movement is booming. If this does not get changed i believe you will be loosing customers that are very eco-friendly. I believe one person can make a difference and i will be fighting for OUR enviroment every day of my life! Please save trees, save stamps, and save the future!
written by Mel, March 19, 2009
www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ztnfpl0MPc
www.earthhour.org/earthinyourhands
written by Chris Minehan, April 03, 2009
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
JAN 30
"At www.enoughco2.com we are looking to save 100 tonnes of CO2 in 100 d..."
View all Comments