| Solar Bubbles Get $21M of Funding |
| Written by Hank Green | |
| Tuesday, 19 February 2008 | |
|
They're doing it by creating solar collecting balloons. The top of the balloon is transparent, while the back of the balloon is reflective. While some of the power will be lost because of imperfect transparency and reflectivity, the "mirrors" cost exponentially less than any other solar concentrator on the market. The rounded mirror backing focuses the sun on a small area of photovoltaic material. The result is that the same amount of sunlight can be captured with significantly less of the (expensive) photovoltaic material. Making the concentrating mirror cheap just further reduces the costs.
Because the devices would be very light, they could be easily mounted on wire structures that would be used to keep them perpendicular to the sun's light. They're hoping to be able to produce power at roughly the costs of natural gas. With California's subsidies that would actually make it one of the cheapest sources of power available. They're already in discussions with several utility companies about the possibility of selling power to them. The $21M will likely only be enough for one pilot plant. But if that's successful, it won't take long for at least one zero to get added on to that total. That's some seriously clever engineering right there. Lets just hope they can stand up to the elements. Via CNet Green Tech Comments
(9)
...
written by Alaya , February 19, 2008
After checking out the website, I noticed that they install these solar bubbles in mid-air -- suspended by wires. Not only would the bubbles be more exposed to the elements, and therefore more likely to rupture, but all of the wires in the air is pretty unfortunate in terms of bird habitat. Any thoughts from others on the matter?
...
written by EV , February 19, 2008
Birds seem to not have problems with wires. A bird-chipper (wind mill) on the other hand, seems to mow them down.
...
written by David , February 19, 2008
Regarding the durability of the balloons, if you dig down into the companies website, you learn they are designed to be replaced every 12 months, interestingly.
On the subject of birds and wind power, modern wind turbines are a relatively low risk to birds. The little old ones were a more significant threat, but the ones being installed now are so high and turn relatively slowly, so the birds seem to avoid them.
Wind
written by Steve , February 20, 2008
Seems like wind would be a significant problem. They probably wouldn't cut it in the plains states (that's where the bird chippers come in).
Why isn't this tech used in AirShips?
written by So... , February 20, 2008
Seems to me that if you filled that biatch with some helium, and hooked the power up to a couple fans, you'd have yourself a solar powered airship. But that's just me.
Can I open liscence the idea in a blog post? If so, consider it done.
Plenty of high wires already in existenc
written by Chris , February 20, 2008
When I saw this I thought that they could be a great addition to the guy wires holding up cell phone and radio towers. It might be a challenge getting the devices up there, but it's a space that's already in use.
Hmmmmmm
written by Bob , February 23, 2008
Great idea, but I have a couple questions. Such a light-weight object would seem to cause alot of issues when it comes to wind, especially if it is not "locked down", and since the inflated, concave, reflective backing is used as a parabolic reflector, it must be moveable in order to be properly oriented to the sun, it can't be anchored in a stationary position. I'm sure there is a way, but it may be an issue.
Also, the effectiveness of a parabolic reflector is dependent on the curve of the parabola and the focal point being correct. As the sun heats the air in the bubble, it will expand, causing the focal point of the parabola to change, and basically making the position of the (apparently) stationary PV panel wrong. Maybe the low cost of the unit is a fair trade for the "touch and go" aspect of the focal point?
PV calibration w.r.t. temperature
written by 672 , February 25, 2008
Good comment about the focal point. However it wouldn't be hard to move the PV cell with respect to focal point. The focal point could be calculated based on expansion of the air with respect to temperature. The PV cell location could then be adjusted on the fly with feedback from a thermocouple. It might add a few bucks to the bottom line but it can be done relatively easily.
| |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Science, technology gadgets and...baby seals. We're in a bit of an eco-mess, but we've got the brains to lick any problem. And that's why EcoGeek.org publishes up to ten stories daily about innovations that are saving the planet.
And if that sounds interesting to you, then congratulations, you're an EcoGeek.
We 
Subscribe to this comment's feed
