The Asus EcoBook was the first computer concept I'd ever seen clad in bamboo. But since then, the idea has looked like it might take off. The highly treated bamboo is non-flammable, lightweight, and, unlike every other computer out there, not made from petrochemicals.
Unfortunately, there have been some questions raised recently about whether bamboo is indeed greener than plastic. But there's no doubt that, just by virtue of its natural look, it appears green. The good news is that Asus is looking at more than just its materials when trying to green its products. The innards of their new computers are labeled for easy repair and recycling and they're some of the first laptops that are truly upgradeable, instead of being semi-solid slabs that are all-but-impossible to upgrade and self-repair.
But the bamboo, it seems, is pretty much a symbolic statement. Though, I have to admit, it's a nice one.
Via Engadget

written by Null, March 11, 2008
Except for all the computers with metal cases. There are plenty of computers with recyclable cases.
written by Josh, March 11, 2008
written by Josh, March 11, 2008
written by Vladan, March 11, 2008
Vladan
www.best-solar-energy.com
written by Rob, March 11, 2008
written by EV, March 11, 2008
The highly (chemically?) treated bamboo is non-flammable, lightweight, and, unlike every other computer out there, not made from petrochemicals.
But what about those chemicals you mention? Are they made from petrochemicals?
A question on the Durability of Bamboo vs. Plastic. Every single portable electronic device I own tends to take a beating, this includes laptops. Accidental 3 foot drops and so on. How will these bamboo cases stand up vs. a plastic one? Add in scratch resistance and a few other things, if you could. Personally, I'm a fan of metal cases for durability, especially for screen protection. (I've broken 3 LCD laptop screens in the past 13 years)
written by Karsten, March 12, 2008
This said, go to my website read the hundreds of ideas on how to reduce your impact on this planet and then accuse me of not being constructive or making a positive contribution. You may not like to read what is there since I will point out what actions actually have an impact, but that is just the way it is. To clean a big mess you use a broom, not a toothbrush.
A eco-geeky technology product should not look chic - it should work and be ecologically sound. When geekism turns toward fashion it turned too shallow to still be of substance.
Karsten
--
http://www.polluteless.com
Practical Advice to Pollute Less
written by Mark R., March 12, 2008
God I hate symbolism...
written by Joe, March 12, 2008
My question about this, and every "new" technology regarding green-ing things up, is have we truly considered how it's exploitation would effect the world? It seems like now days, someone sees an idea and markets' it like crazy, but never really thought about it. Reference the water motor from a week ago. The article claimed that any stream, with moderate force, could run this motor. So we block up or divert a stream? Not to say it's all together a bad idea, just maybe we should really think things through. (Which is one of the great things about the internet and blogs, a dialogue can be started about something and discussed. I'll be the first to admit I don't know or think of everything)
It (back to the Bamboo) is definitely an interesting idea, and anything to move away from plastics, as long as it is comparable, has my vote.
written by J Vail, March 12, 2008
written by Lindsay Hobson, March 13, 2008
written by Martin, March 14, 2008
Please note that the over-simplification here is intentional. The point I am trying to make is that sustainability is about buying less, not about doing the same thing slightly differently. We need to start thinking in systems. As someone else said on this blog, the greenest gadget is the one that you don't buy.
Cheers,
Martin
written by RAGHAVAN KANNAN, March 16, 2008
written by trevor, April 17, 2008
http://smart-parts.net/blog/?p=279
written by stephanie, May 13, 2008
written by battery pack, August 11, 2008
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Recent Comment
Share
Sustainability is not about appearance and if it stays about appearance the changes that need to occur will appear to turn into reality.
Karsten
--
http://www.polluteless.com
_________________________________________
Living on Earth:
Sufficient resources - Wasteful existence - 6.5 Billion humans; Preserve two and abandon the third.
_________________________________________