| World's Largest Retail Building Goes Green |
| Written by Hank Green | ||
| Tuesday, 25 March 2008 | ||
|
About a week ago, EcoGeek realized the efficiency improvements in America's buildings could save more energy than is used by all planes, trains, cars, and trucks in America. This vast energy savings won't come easily, but it must come. A commenter pointed out that it's important to focus on cars and trucks because they have shorter life spans, and thus efficiency improvements can be realized faster. But buildings can also be retrofitted to be greener, and with great effect. In fact, since only 2% of buildings in America were built in the last few years, retrofitting is going to have to be a huge part of this. And it's pretty inspiring to see that we're starting with the largest retail building in the world, the Chicago Merchandise Mart. The Merch Mart is HUGE, more than 4 million square feet. During the day, 20,000 people inhabit this single structure. It has its own zip code (60654). When it was built, it was the largest building in the world. But, due to the leadership of its owners, and the City of Chicago, the Merchandise Mart has a new spot in the Guinness book...as the largest Green Building in the world. It now uses 35% less water and 10% less energy than before the upgrades. And, for a building this size, the upgrades were significant:
For more information on this absolutely fantastic retrofit of the World's Largest Retail Building, check out this article in Business Week. And for some high-res pictures of the Chicago Merchandise Market, keep reading.
   Pictures by J. Crocker, Serhii Chrucky and Jeremy Atherton.
Comments
(10)
This is awesome!
written by Nerdfighter Megan Parchem , March 26, 2008
More places need to take this example. Now if only we could ban plastic bags, ort charge like 25 cents for em or moree to deter people from using them.
Flush less toilets?
written by Aaron , March 26, 2008
I'm wondering if they had flush less toilets installed? We have those here at school and they're more efficient. They do take some getting used to, though.
What's up with the bags?
written by josh , March 26, 2008
This article has nothing to do with plastic bags. Additionally, recent studies have shown that plastic killing us all is based on flawed science is just a "bandwagon" people have jumped onto. The paper bags actually cause more harm. Besides, they make excellent free trash bags, bags for recyclables, and the rest can be recycled at Wal-Mart and dozens of other stores. They're the same type of plastic as milk jugs.
Plastic Bags
written by Micah , March 26, 2008
While they are the same type of plastic, the City of Chicago will not recycle them. You have to turn them in to grocery stores for recycling.
Plastic Bags
written by Roy , March 26, 2008
yeah, my city won't even recycle milk jugs...
wait, how did we get onto bags again? Oh, and josh, do you have links to any of those articles? I'd love to see!
What an awesome example!
written by Violet , March 26, 2008
This is a great example of how even huge buildings can become more eco-friendly with a couple of simple upgrades. I encourage all business owners (large or small) to check out openeco.org. You can plug in your info and track your energy usage as well as compare it to others in the same industry. Its an easy way for businesses to reduce their carbon footprint. Way to go Chicago Merchandise Market!
Payback period
written by Kent Ragen , March 26, 2008
Buildings are a huge source of pollution and energy usage, so these efforts are necessary. But I'm always struck by the amount of investment (e.g. 4000 new windows) and curious about a) does the savings in "footprint" take this initial "additional footprint investmen" into account and b) what's the payback period, or how many years of "more efficient operations" are required to offset this initial investment?
Kent www.ecounit.com
...
written by Magnulus , March 27, 2008
I was wondering about the payback myself, and I would imagine it takes at least ten years or so to pay itself back in money they save, at least. But the thing is that glass can be relatively easily recycled, and I know from experience that 100-year-old windows don't exactly do anyone any favours in heating and that sort of thing.
I don't think there's a problem in terms of the footprint of the retrofitting itself as houses are meant to last for quite some time, and especially when you've got a house or building that's already lasted a long time and is still in good condition. Another plus-side to this is that once this place starts to produce positive numbers, I think a lot of other managements will probably pick it up themselves. Any chance to save loads of money is gladly taken. Now, how about some wind turbines and solar panels on that roof, eh? ^_^
Bags
written by josh , March 27, 2008
I originally saw an article on yahoo, but I just used google. I haven't seen the actual studies, just articles online. Here is pretty reputable one:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article3508263.ece
I Can Do Better
written by jim , July 19, 2008
Install waterless toilets. You can pee in them. For the other thing, take it with you. Hey, we pick up after dogs in our parks. Install rooftop gardens to recycle greywater for reuse. Install rain catch cisterns on rooftops. Install solar panels. Walk up and down stairs. Elevators are really not necessary. Want to lose 20 pounds? Walk up to the 89th floor everyday. Install slides to return to the ground floor, faster than an elevator. So, we reduce our trips to the cardiologist and get to the lobby quicker. I have more ideas...
| ||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Science, technology gadgets and...baby seals. We're in a bit of an eco-mess, but we've got the brains to lick any problem. And that's why EcoGeek.org publishes up to ten stories daily about innovations that are saving the planet.
And if that sounds interesting to you, then congratulations, you're an EcoGeek.
Subscribe to this comment's feed
