Quantcast
New World Record for Thin Film Solar Efficiency  E-mail
Written by Hank Green   
Thursday, 27 March 2008

thin film solar NREL

The National Renewable Energy Lab (famous for many amazing renewable energy breakthroughs) announced today that they've created the most efficient thin film solar panel in history.

The 19.9% efficiency doesn't seem all that fantastic when compared with 42% efficient monocrystaline solar panels. But the advantage of thin-film cells has long been how cheap they can be to produce and install. They can be produced in a variety of ways (people are literally using inkjet printers to create them) and they're just a fraction of the weight of traditional solar cells.

For a long time, thin-film scientists have been working to get costs lower and lower, with less concern for the efficiency of the cells. However, shortages in indium, one of the elements used in making the cells, has renewed interest in increasing efficiency. And, of course, any efficiency increase helps to make the panels more economical over the lifetime of the cell.

That is, if the efficiency doesn't come at a great cost. NREL increased the efficiency so substantially by "increasing the quality of the material applied" during manufacturing. While this doesn't say much, it does indicate that it was likely pretty expensive to do. But worrying about economics isn't the job of government labs. They prove what can be done, and then it's more or less up to the private sector to incorporate the technology into their production.

Hopefully, we'll see some thin-film startups focusing more on efficiency soon. It'd be a shame to see the world's total supply of indium get sucked into 8% efficient cells.

Via NREL and Renewable Energy World


Comments (3)add
?
written by Anonymous , March 28, 2008
Seems like you found the story on treehugger since you use the same image, so why no link?
24%
written by Alex , March 28, 2008
I think you meant 24%, not 42%, for silicon cells. 42% is for crazy-expensive triple-junction cells. 19.9% is pretty good compared to 24% for monocrystalline silicon or 20% for poly silicon.
Re: 24%
written by Jeff , March 31, 2008
I'm sure these new thin film cells are crazy expensive too, so given the current thin-film cells are 8-10%, I'd say thin film is currently pulling 1/2 the efficiency of silicon.
Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley

busy

Hank Green
About the author:

Hank Green is the founder and chief geek at EcoGeek.org. Aside from being obsessed with saving the planet with technology, he loves to write and make videos. If you want to find out more about him, visit hankgreen.com

 
< Prev   Next >

Are You an EcoGeek?

Science, technology gadgets and...baby seals. We're in a bit of an eco-mess, but we've got the brains to lick any problem. And that's why EcoGeek.org publishes up to ten stories daily about innovations that are saving the planet.

And if that sounds interesting to you, then congratulations, you're an EcoGeek.

Weekly Updates

RSS

rss