| Carbon Sciences May Save the World with Chalk |
| Written by Hank Green | ||
| Monday, 28 April 2008 | ||
|
We tracked down Carbon Science's sole employee, their CEO, Derek McLeish, to talk about their technology, and the effects he hopes it will have. EcoGeek: So you want to turn CO2 into calcium carbonate. That's basically limestone...chalk...right? Derek McLeish: If you look at the calcium carbonate market, it's moved into 64 different kinds of calclum carbonate. It's in toothpaste, yogurt, milk filler, PVC, paper, etc. All of these applications require different grades, and they can cost anywhere from $5 a ton to $1000 per ton. We'll never have too much calcium carbonate. 60% of calcium carbonate is currently used in the paper industry as a filler and brightener. Nowadays they're actually co-locating calcium carbonate plants along side paper plants. EcoGeek: But we are talking about a LOT of calcium carbonate here. Right?
EcoGeek: To Create CaCO3 from CO2, you need a lot of calcium. Where do you think all of that rock is going to come from? EcoGeek: Obviously there is no incentive for CO2 producers to look into this technology right now. What does the carbon sequestration industry need to get on its feet? EcoGeek: There are a lot of other proposed ways to get rid of CO2, though none of them are very well proven. What do you see as other viable and not-so-viable solutions?
Comments
(7)
...
written by selenized , April 28, 2008
On a somewhat related note there is a group in the UK that is looking at modifying soils to sequester carbon as calcium carbonate as well. While this wouldn't be an industrial product, it certainly looks like carbonates are coming into vogue as a carbon capture technology.
...
written by summera , April 29, 2008
ecogreek is an intelligent way providing good information.
Some interesting ideas
written by Michael Peacock , April 29, 2008
I agree that the idea of geosequestering CO2 isn't likely to pan out, and I find the notion of turning all that excess CO2 into CaCO3 really interesting. My question is how efficient is the conversion process? As in corn-based ethanol, it wasn't until we looked at the total production costs that we realized that it would consume more energy than it produced. In this case, if the entire process requires additional energy input to sequester the CO2 into calcium carbonate, then presumably there will be CO2 emissions as a result of the process. What's the net-net there?
Help your business go green!
written by katherine , April 29, 2008
Help your business go green!
My name is Katherine and I work for a Television Production Company called Creative Bube Tube INC. out of Toronto. I just wanted to let you know that if you are looking to take your business green, I know a very cost effective way, which will help everyone out in your office too. We recently changed our water cooler over to a bottle less water cooler. There is no heavy lifting with the refills and because there are no plastic bottles to replace its much better for the environment. It's a small change but has a big impact. Also, no one has to refill it; the cooler is connected to a water supply in the wall. You can also choose hot or cold, it's so cost-effective. Water bottles produce bacteria and with this bottle less water cooler it has water purification inside it so you don’t have to worry about that. The best thing about not having to lift these heavy bottles is the fact that you don't have to worry about storing them anywhere too. It really is the easiest way to take your business green, as well as being cost effective and easy to use, it's a great choice. Oh, also if you would like some advice on where you can purchase them, you can go to www.cityh20.com that's where we got ours at City Water International. It's a Toronto business and they have any info you need on these bottle less water coolers. Thanks and I hope you will do the same as us. Cheers Katherine
...
written by Tim McGee , May 03, 2008
I'm left wondering what the energy requirements are in the process (the reactor). I'm also curious about scale, and the potential for local use of small scale calcium deposits.
It seems like a great way to pick up on the wastes of other industries, but how about recycling current dry wall, or other building waste? Is there a way this can become an industrial loop as well as a sequestering system? I think this is an exciting company, and I'm excited to see where they go. Thanks Hank.
What tosh.
written by T , May 05, 2008
This is rubbish, wallboard an chalk are made of Calcium Sulphate not Calcium Carbonate.
A little research please
written by S , July 26, 2008
If your going to make bold claims about what is or isn't chalk you may wish to do a brief bit of research to make sure what your saying is correct, alternatively you can continue making yourself look like a fool.
| ||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Science, technology gadgets and...baby seals. We're in a bit of an eco-mess, but we've got the brains to lick any problem. And that's why EcoGeek.org publishes up to ten stories daily about innovations that are saving the planet.
And if that sounds interesting to you, then congratulations, you're an EcoGeek.