Nanotubes: Good for the Environment...But Bad for You?  E-mail
Written by Gavin D.J. Harper   
Thursday, 22 May 2008

Nanotubes.... dontchajustlovethem? As nanotechnology advances rapidly, and appears to be an almost invaluable tool in the sustainable technologists armoury, being employed in a variety of next-gen technologies: Hydrogen storage, solar devices, more efficient semiconductors, and lightweight materials that could result in lighter composites all use nanotubes and other nanomaterials in their construction. They can even help turn CO2 into usable fuel!

However, Liz Borkowski from Grist has picked up on an article in the Journal Nature Nanotechnology, whose authors reckon that there could be a more sinister side to EcoGeek's favourite little allotropes of carbon... and raises the spectre of 'asbestos' - the former wonder-material turned nasty. Previously used in more applications than you could shake a stick at, asbestos was discovered to cause particularly nasty cancers.
 
Asbestos, is long thin crystals of a natural mineral, whilst carbon nanotubes are long thin constructions of carbon atoms. There is a cautionary tale for the adoption of new technologies, lets keep our fingers crossed that nanotubes are benign. But questions remain about what effects nanotubes have in current uses. While injecting them into rats certainly causes problems, will they really kill if simply coating the faces of solar panels?

We will certainly need to watch out for applications that might shed nanotubes. And anything that would result in inhaling the stuff should be avoided at all costs. But mosts applications should be entirely benign.

Via. Grist


Comments (1)add
This is the second study in months to co
written by Lauren Guite , May 23, 2008
Check out this Nanotechnology Note's blog post about the first study (http://environmentaldefenseblo...e-thought/)

These two studies took different approaches but together, they make a strong case that multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) cause inflammation and cancers in a similar fashion to asbestos, at least if they have been deposited directly within the peritoneum.

More studies need to be done to determine whether there could be substantial concentrations in the air that workers (or other exposed persons) breathe. Then we need to find out whether inhaled MWCNTs will make their way from the airspaces of the lungs, through the lung tissue, to the lung and abdominal cavity linings – something asbestos does with relative ease.

You can read more about this at http://environmentaldefenseblo...t-part-ii/

Lauren Guite
Environmental Defense Fund
Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley

busy

Gavin D.J. Harper
About the author:


 
< Prev   Next >

Are You an EcoGeek?

Science, technology gadgets and...baby seals. We're in a bit of an eco-mess, but we've got the brains to lick any problem. And that's why EcoGeek.org publishes up to ten stories daily about innovations that are saving the planet.

And if that sounds interesting to you, then congratulations, you're an EcoGeek.

Weekly Updates

RSS

rss