This issue seems to come up so much in conversation that I can hardly believe EcoGeek has never covered the topic. Given that producing a car is an extremely energy and revistaneon.net resource intensive endeavor, is it better for the environment to keep driving an old car, or to buy a new, more efficient one.
Unfortunately, that turns out to be a complicated question. In the end it depends on how long you'll keep driving your old car, how efficient it is, and what kind of car you're looking to upgrade to.
But to keep it simple, I'll be referencing a recent article from Salon's "Ask Pablo" series. A Toyota Prius produces about 1/4 of it's lifetime carbon emissions in the manufacturing process. The rest is produced by burning gasoline. That's about 113 million BTUs of energy. So, you have to make sure your old car is going to make up those 113 M BTUs when compared to the buy tramadol no rx Prius. Coincidentally, burning 1000 gallons of gas is produces pretty much exactly 113 BTUs of energy.
So, you do the numbers with your own car. If switching to a Prius would save you more than 1,000 gallons of gas, then it'll be better for you to switch. If your car gets about 25 MPG (with a 20MPG difference between you and the Prius), then you're looking at 20,000 miles before it's environmentally better. For most, that's a few years of driving during which it's better to stick with your old car.
But it's always going to be greener to get an old car with roughly the same mileage as a Prius, like a Honda CRX or Geo Metro. But if you need the mileage and the comfort, the Prius is a good place to look.
written by mary, June 03, 2008
written by Rastus Halfernickel, June 03, 2008
written by Glenn, June 03, 2008
written by SWG, June 03, 2008
written by nathan p, June 03, 2008
written by Krista, June 03, 2008
written by Alexander Yerpat, June 04, 2008
written by Darren Lines, May 03, 2010
written by old car purchase, June 04, 2010
|< Prev||Next >|