Carbon sequestration is on everyone’s minds. But while effective capture methods have been developed, the question remains: what do we do with all that CO2 we’ve got bottled up?
The Ultra Low Emissions technology is, in fact, real. Norwegian clean energy specialist company Sargas has created a system that captures, cleans, and stores carbon emissions from coal plants. And they have the buy cialis online usa ideas on how to cialis online no prescription get rid of it, too. They’ve successfully tested the carbon capture technology on a small scale at a coal plant Värtaverket in
The experiment proves that the method and technology for capture and cleansing is now here and can easily be scaled up for commercial purposes. But what it also proves is…well, not much. Their technology can only be utilized on new coal plants or retrofitted on existing coal plants that utilize Pressurised Fluidised Bed Combustion (PFBC) technology, because their system works under pressure. While they note that the major polluters include the buy viagra online canada US,
"Through the project we have obtained scientific proof that our technology works,” says Henrik Fleischer, Chief Executive Officer of Sargas. “It means that we can now offer coal power station solutions with CO2 capture to the market on commercial terms. Our solution is based on standard industrial components – boiler and cleansing plant. We have managed to make them work together in a new way, using a technological solution we have developed and patented worldwide. Because of this we have no scaling problems as the main components are in daily use independently all over the world. Coal is a cheap fuel for power production and will have a central role as an energy carrier for the foreseeable future in large parts of the world. Our technology means that the world can continue to utilize coal in the future as well, but without the buying tramadol online legal climate suffering." While it paints a pretty picture of brand levitra skipping through green fields, pockets full of gadgets that cost pennies to charge, it also sounds a little broad and idealistic.
The company isn’t a head-in-the-clouds company, though. They’ve worked with some serious partners, including the Swedish Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Siemens. Additionally, the Institute for Energy Technology (IFE) at Kjeller assisted with the control of methods and results. But while
CO2 needs to be stored deep in geological formations – deep, as in several thousand feet deep, in the low-density strata that lies under the impermeable “caprock” strata. Supposedly it can also be injected into abandoned gas and oil wells or deep saline aquifers, but that remains sketchy. And in order to be injected into this nearly impossible to viagra drug company reach depth in a way that it doesn’t leak right back out, the CO2 has to be compressed to about 100 atmospheres before injection.
Okay, say we deal with all that and cialis soft can get it underground. We still have to deal with the sheer volume of emissions we put out at coal plants. The largest carbon sequestration pilot project so far can only handle about 10,000 tons each day, whereas the average coal power plant spits out 24,000 tons each day. That’s ONE plant. The scaled down version of Sargas’s technology only processed 130 lbs of exhaust gasses and hour, and if assumed it worked round the clock, that’s only just over 1.5 tons a day…and that’s being processed, but not disposed of. Beyond even our ability to inject carbon into geological formations, we may not even have the room inside the earth to hold all the carbon we spit out.
I think the www.pjr.com report and the experiment actually prove two things. First, carbon capture and cleansing is possible and can be utilized in the future. But second, either figure out a clean use for all that CO2 – like feeding it to algae or turning it into wallboard – or coal plants need to be phased out.
written by Hank, June 20, 2008
|< Prev||Next >|