| California is New Home for MIT’s RawSolar |
| Written by Jaymi Heimbuch | ||
| Tuesday, 01 July 2008 | ||
|
Back in May we covered how the dish works, and it’s great to see the team making some progress on the business end of the project. While they aren’t the only low-cost solar concentrating system in the works, they’re taking a unique angle on its use. Rather than producing electricity, RawSolar is focusing on selling steam power that can heat buildings or be applied to manufacturing processes. The dish has a 12-foot-long tube rising from the center that has water running through it and, when pointed at the sun, can turn that water in to steam immediately. RawSolar hopes to covert companies using thermal power to steam power, utilizing power purchase agreements that are cheaper than what the companies spend on natural gas for thermal power. Concentrated solar is getting a lot of eyes turned its way because it is generally space-efficient and cost-efficient. Because RawSolar’s dish can be easily constructed from inexpensive and easily obtained materials, with minimal labor and technical knowledge involved, it promises to be one of the most practical and cost-efficient solar-concentrating systems. David Pelly, MIT Sloan School of Management lecturer, stated that this is the cheapest set-up he’s seen to a solar energy system, and notes that the fact that it is made of inexpensive materials available anywhere in the world makes global use of the product possible. It’ll be exciting to see where the team takes this venture. The bay area is attractive to RawSolar because there are fewer solar companies there than in other areas of Via Earth2Tech, MIT; Photos via RawSolar
Comments
(3)
...
written by disdaniel , July 01, 2008
Space-efficiency
written by mike , July 01, 2008
A concentrated solar panel is more space efficient because you only need to one or a few taking up several square meters, as opposed to acres for commercial-scale solar fields planned for the Mojave desert.
...
written by Clinch , July 01, 2008
I thought they'd be less space efficient, as not only do they need to cover the same area that light falls on (with mirrors instead of plants) but they also need to create a raised portion to protrude to where the light is focused (as apposed to panels, which are just flat).
Although you would need to cover less area with mirrors for the same amount of power if the concentrated solar panel (at the focus point) is more efficient than flat/ground panels (although, I've heard it's about 30% for both). Also, on some posts, the comment thing says my email is invalid, and wont let me post. What's up with that?!? |
||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Science, technology gadgets and...baby seals. We're in a bit of an eco-mess, but we've got the brains to lick any problem. And that's why EcoGeek.org publishes up to ten stories daily about innovations that are saving the planet.
And if that sounds interesting to you, then congratulations, you're an EcoGeek.
I get the cheaper part, but how is concentrated solar space efficient?