
We all know we have the power to make the world a bit greener – and many feel that includes messing with DNA for environmental improvements, or just better efficiency for our gadgets. Now there’s new hope that DNA could play a major role in making computers run with little or no external power.
Researchers at the
As Ruchi Mallya, an analyst on the use of technology in pharmaceuticals and biotechnology with Datamonitor, explains, such computers are constructed using DNA as software and enzymes as hardware, rather than traditional silicon-based components. This could then hopefully be the start of a new kind of external biological information storage system.
DNA molecules are similar to computer hard drives: they save information about an individual’s genes, but they have one advantage in that they have the potential to perform calculations faster than any man-made computers. The computer on which you’re reading this article is using nowhere near as many simultaneous actions as your DNA molecules required to make reading this article possible.
“In addition, unlike today's PCs, DNA computers require minimal or no external power sources as they run on internal energy produced during cellular reactions,” says Mallya. “There is a huge amount of potential for a computer that does not need to be plugged in the implications this has for laptops and true mobility are endless.”
The goal is to one day integrate DNA into a computer chip to create a biochip. That will make standard computers faster and more energy efficient. “DNA computers could potentially be the future of green IT,” she says. Research team leader Masahiko Inouye says the findings could lead to improvements in gene therapy, futuristic nano-sized computers and other high-tech advances. Already DNA has been harnessed to create simple electronic circuits but the University of Toyama scientists have taken it one step further by stitching together four entirely new artificial DNA.
Mallya says there are still years of research ahead, but she anticipates that companies such as Apple, Dell, HP, IBM, Intel and Sun Microsystems might begin investing in research that emphasizes artificial DNA and its possible applications, shaking a potential Pandora’s Box next to their ears.
Via LiveScience, ComputerWeekly, Guardian, ScienceNews; Photo via jurvetson

written by paizlea, July 24, 2008
written by Gustavion, July 24, 2008
written by Alisha, July 25, 2008
written by Jacob, July 25, 2008
written by Doug, July 25, 2008
So the I/O of this "DNA computer" was quite slow, but then there was the real catch: it couldn't solve problems of any significant size without needing a ridiculous amount of material. The DNA fragment interactions were essentially enumerating all possible combinations of the input data, in order to find the solution. As anyone at all familiar with algorithms knows, problems that are actually interesting can really explode in terms of the number of possible combinations. A problem that would be solvable on a regular computer using an intelligent algorithm might require more DNA than can fit into the known universe, using that brute-force approach.
That example was from around around 1994; I haven't heard a single hint of any other kind of "DNA computer" since then, and I think I keep up with the science & computing scenes pretty well.
Certainly, this article here doesn't say anything -- the event reported on was the creation of artificial DNA molecules; after that, the article somehow leaps into a fuzzy, speculative notion of "DNA computers", as if artificial DNA would have anything to do with that. Then it jumps from there into somehow saying that such computers could run without any external energy source.
Yeah, right.
written by Grus i Salaten, July 27, 2008
written by jay, July 29, 2008
what is the relation between DNA and computer every body speaking about this topic but no one relates both
written by Jene, August 29, 2008
Is it really necessary?
No.
-_-
written by 0chance, January 09, 2009
Also, I don't want my computer to have the chance to become sentient. I, Robot is not the future for me!
written by ranking, February 16, 2012
#3 - kindly older gentlemen with basic understanding of cellular processes
#4 - not sure if troll or just luddite
#5 - Someone with an actual degree
#6, 7 - woosh, woosh with bad grammar
#8, 9 - the same kind of people that complain about Facebook UI changes
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
JUL 24
"#1,2 - naive initial reaction to article, not much substance #3 - kind..."
View all Comments