
Back in the beginning of June we talked about BlueFire’s hopes to build their first commercial scale plant in
BlueFire hopes to have the plant up and running by the end of 2009, converting about 170 tons of woody and grassy grossness dumped daily into as much as 3.2 million gallons per year…just a portion of the 3 billion gallons they hope to produce from as many as 20 similar plants by 2017.
The permits and plans fly in the face of all the ethanol plants that are losing ground – mainly this is possible because BlueFire uses a non-food-based fuel for creating ethanol. No one wants to eat garbage, and using landfill land is far less controversial than using farm land.
With the push to use cellulosic ethanol more and more as a sustainable fuel source, including for jets, BlueFire is sure to have a strong consumer demand to fill – DuPont and Genencor estimate the market for non-food based fuel will eventually be worth $75 billion. I don’t doubt it.
Via Earth2Tech, Denver Post

written by dialtone, July 25, 2008
the simplest is the best
written by Tim, July 25, 2008
http://www.brightfuture.us/new/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=151&Itemid=27
written by w, July 26, 2008
Whether it's made from garbage or plant waste (cellulose), ethanol is great because it's easy to convert existing engines to run on it.
Also, talking about the future of plug-in electric hybrid cars, we could use waste generated, cellulose generated, or some other form of ethanol for long range trips.
While we are waiting for technology and infrastructure to catch up, what we should do is start producing new cars (hybrid and conventional) that run on natural gas instead of gasoline. Natural gas is abundant and is cheaper and cleaner for the environment than oil, and even reducing the oil demand by just 10% would have a huge impact on prices. Then in the future, we can use some combination of ethanol, hydrogen, and/or natural gas for cars. All three fuels can be made from renewable, carbon-neutral sources of energy. It's just going to take the political will and a lot of scientific and technology ingenuity to do this, but it can be done. The quicker we get this moving, the less painful it will be.
Oh, and btw, everyone needs to be a "greenie". You don't have to be extreme about it, but it is the responsibility of EVERYONE to keep our only planet the beautiful place it is for our children and grandchildren. The earth is suffering pretty bad right now between widescale, terrible pollution, climate change, the rainforests being cut down, and the extreme amount of garbage and waste being burried all over the planet.
That said, we don't need to destroy the economy or make unimaginable sacrifices to keep our planet nice. We have the technology and ingenuity to fix all our problems. We just need the will to do it.
Obama '08
written by Flahooler, July 26, 2008
In contrast, plasma gasification processes such as those being used by the likes of Coskata, Range Fuels, and Fulcrum Biofuels are able to bypass the costly pretreatment steps and do not require significant amounts of fresh water like enzymatic processes. These companies are planning for commercial-scale production in the 2010-2011 timeframe at a price point of less than $1 per gallon. Ultimately, I think the lower cost of plasma gasification is going to win out over enzymatic processes such as BlueFire's.
Kudos to them for advancing the technology, though. Maybe it will prove viable after all.
written by chemrat, July 26, 2008
written by chemrat, July 27, 2008
Best wishes.
written by derek, July 28, 2008
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Recent Comment
Share
I'm not really a greenie, BUT if it works with lees pollution, then cool. Also, it might force gas prices down, because there's been absolutely ZERO competition to oil-based fuels, so that's another plus.