| Google Pagerank for Ecosystems |
| Written by Jaymi Heimbuch | ||
| Thursday, 14 August 2008 | ||
|
Late on the jump as far as breaking news goes, but here a must-write-about concept. I watched this story leap around the eco-tech blogosphere, and finally had an “aha” moment as to how totally awesome it really is when I listened to my regular dose of 60-Second Science yesterday. The idea is essentially this:
Google has a great way to rank pages in order of importance. Trusting that you, dear reader, embody the geek side of EcoGeek, I don’t need to go into detail on Pagerank. Just as ranking webpages is complicated, so to is tracing the links of the food web and ranking the impact species extinction will have on ecosystems. Stefano Allesino has outlined a “new” way to track the importance of species within ecosystems – copy Google. While everything is indeed dependant on everything else, there are still some critters that cause far more noticeable impact than others when present or absent from an area. So, as one organism impacts multiple others, it rises in importance.
Using similar alogorithmic methods to rank species as Google uses for webpages, conservationists will have an easier time knowing where to focus immediate efforts and resources for endangered flora and fauna. This is one of those exciting and cool uses of technology for the environment that don’t seem to pop up too often. The concept behind it can be widely spread out to include the ranking of whole ecosystems in keeping the world’s functions in balance, and ranking the negative impacts organisms have on their environments (ahem, humans, ahem). The interdependence of living things can make this pretty tricky, but I can’t wait to see the system come to fruition.
photo via befuddledsenses
Comments
(3)
Neat.... but,
written by The Food Monster , August 14, 2008
how will it work
written by jared , August 15, 2008
Google works (I think) because there is data of folks going to pages. How will comparable data be traced to a certain tree versus a certain bug? Would it only be scientists that estimate the data?
have you read?
written by Charlie , August 15, 2008
Have you read Bottomfeeder by Taras Grescoe? It's about the collapse of fish stocks around the world and how to eat fish ethically and sustainably in the world. Not terribly geeky, but very eco so....
anyway, he talks about this concept a bit by tying the trophic ranking of a species (the higher the number, the higher it is in the food chain) to the health of the surrounding eco-system. He doesn't call up the google page-rank concept, but trophic numbers could be one way of looking at this. Also, great book. |
||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Science, technology gadgets and...baby seals. We're in a bit of an eco-mess, but we've got the brains to lick any problem. And that's why EcoGeek.org publishes up to ten stories daily about innovations that are saving the planet.
And if that sounds interesting to you, then congratulations, you're an EcoGeek.
The Food Monster
author of: http://thefoodmonsterblog.blogspot.com