I have a couple of problems with the continued villainy of bottled water. First and foremost, it's a given. If you're conscious of the effect your lifestyle has on the environment, there's no reason why you should be drinking bottled water. It's obviously stupid, it's like buying a can of air.
I'm not sure why we need two dozen campaigns to fight against buying what already comes out of our faucets for free, but I have this nagging feeling that all of that concern and effort would be better spent elsewhere. Like, how about getting congress to pass a tax credit for renewable energy.
I'm also concerned that we've somehow overlooked that bottled water isn't nearly as popular as bottled sugar water. Bottled sugar water, it turns out, is actually worse for the environment than bottled water, because you have to get the sugar. Something we enviros don't like to talk about is the fact that soft-drink purchases have actually declined significantly since the advent of bottled water. This can't be a bad thing, especially considering the obesity epidemic.
Still, for some reason, there's no campaign against soda, which is responsible for about seven times more waste than bottled water.
What we're seeing here is a perfect example of a visible problem being overblown simply because it's visible. Sodas aren't visible because they've always been there, bottled water is relatively new to the scene (and altogether sillier) so it's easier to see.
But the real problem is all of the waste we never see. Like the waste that comes from that extra guest bedroom in the house, that we have just in case, but we heat and cool all year round. Or the coal fired power plants that litter the country....just far enough away that we can't see them while we're using the electricity that they produce. Or all the energy it takes to create products we buy even before they're plugged in.
America's love affair with bottled water is comparably a stupid and small problem.
Yes, it's shameful that we scorn our safe, tasty tap water in favor of a more convenient option while billions of people have no safe water to drink at all. But it is certainly not the most shameful thing about our lifestyles, so get over it. We've got more important problems folks.

written by Lobo, September 15, 2008
written by Slices, September 15, 2008
written by Amy, September 15, 2008
written by P Proefrock, September 15, 2008
From a Michigan perspective, soda, beer, and carbonated water containers all are subject to the state 10-cent bottle refund, while bottled water bottles are not. So, bottled water containers are far more likely to appear discarded alongside roads or into trash and landfills, while recycling for containers with deposits is much higher, and they are far less visible.
written by Stephanie, September 15, 2008
You have a good point about the soda though.
I think the real issue is that one time use containers are bad for the environment. What is in them is not the big part of it. However, we need to be realistic here. There are times when you just need something to drink.
written by Mudkips, September 15, 2008
written by Ruth W, September 15, 2008
written by Ruth W, September 15, 2008
written by jj, September 15, 2008
written by Ellen, September 15, 2008
written by Nikita Kondraskov, September 15, 2008
For example the vulcanic water from volvic tastes sandy. The waters from northern Italy taste chulky. The waters from the melted Arctic ice have a heavy taste of the cold spring.
Once in a while the need for good taste will force the mind to buy bottled water.
On the other hand the taste of plastic spoils the water shortly after it was exposed to air or warmth.
written by Adam, September 15, 2008
written by Hank, September 15, 2008
2. Bottled water isn't sold because of taste, it's sold because of convenience, because sometimes you want water but don't want to bend down over the tap with cupped hands to get it. It's almost entirely a convenience issue.
3. Soda is just fancied up water. It's hardly more than a vector for mood-altering substances. It's far worse for the environment than water because it contains byproducts of petroleum and factory farming. Plus, we drink seven times more bottled and canned soda than bottled and canned water (which is where that statistic comes from btw.)
If you want sugar water, make some freakin' lemonade or buy kool-aid packets...jeez.
written by yosh hash, September 15, 2008
If only people had the intelligence to see things for what they are, but there are a lot of people who still believe the invented hype that bottled water is somehow superior to tap water.
If you don't believe that, go out and do a random survey. People are getting wise, but there are still a lot of retards out there who don't want to drink tap water. THAT is who the awareness campaign is aimed at. Please don't knock people for "acting locally".
written by Ken Roberts, September 16, 2008
written by Eddy De Clercq, September 16, 2008
As mentioned in this blog, many people are reluctant versus tap water. They prefer mineral water, pushed by big media campaigns emphasizing that only water of volcanic origin or purified x number of years through the mountains can be really healthy.
The message you should remember is that you keep the use of bottled water to a minimum.
Eddy
written by TC, September 16, 2008
What we're seeing here is a perfect example of a visible problem being overblown simply because it's visible.
You're overlooking several key points. As several have pointed out, soda isn't widely available from the tap, and last I checked, nobody considers soda critical to survival. You can't say that about water, and many of us - who live in the rural communities targeted by bottled water giant Nestle for bottling plants - are concerned about corporate control of what should public water supplies.
For example, Nestle so badly wants to extract water (for its Poland Spring label) from the tiny town of Fryeburg that it's sued them five times - despite the fact the town's clearly said no.
In McCloud, CA, Nestle's proposed bottling plant (that yes, they went to court to try and protect) would have meant 600 truck trips per day through the town.
The pollution and noise impacts - not to mention the damage to wastersheds that occurs when you remove so much water from a single watershed - can't be divorced from the larger discussion of bottled water.
For those living in small towns under siege from bottlers like Nestle, it's hardly a small, unimportant problem as you suggested.
written by Max, September 16, 2008
People say they drink bottled water because they don't trust their tap water- if everyone in a community demands that their publicly controlled water supply is clean and safe, it will be. But if too many members of a community don't care because they can just buy bottled water, nothing will get done.
And to those who say it's a convenience when you're away from home- you are aware that tap water is portable, right?
written by Herno, September 16, 2008
Soda, is a good product and you shouldn´t stigmatice it, again, the product itself is not the problem, the "usage" is. If instead of plastic you used reusable glass bottles then there wouldn´t be so much plastic in landfills...but someone can say you are using potable water to clean the glass bottles when there´s people that don´t have any.
written by Tom Lauria, September 16, 2008
written by Danny Wool, September 16, 2008
And while I am at it, I may as well mention Crystal Light, a soft drink powder that gets added to tap water. The packaging there is ridiculous too: individual plastic containers, each containing about a tablespoon of powder, in a larger plastic tube. What a waste of packaging for a few spoons of powder.
Soft drinks may not be the greatest environmental problem we face, but they do promote a culture of wastefulness, in packaging and in the products themselves.
written by e, September 18, 2008
For that reason, you can get thrown out of many night clubs for cupping your hands under the tap. Some nightclubs only run hot water in their bathrooms. It doesn't leave you with a lot of options if you want to dance for a few hours, but don't want to pass out from dehydration.
on a side note, in addition to worrying about the energy used to air condition the spare room, there's also the embodied energy in the spare room itself. The average house in Australia over the last 50 years are 2x the size with 2x as many cars and 1/2 the people on a plot of land that is half the size.
written by Sarah Cobler, September 18, 2008
I don't think the issue is overhyped, I think its misunderstood.
xox
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
SEP 15
"Bottled water is for those of us that don't appreciate the enforced me..."
View all Comments