
AC power has long been the only game in town, ever since it became the standard over a hundred years ago. Supporters of DC, however, are pushing for a comeback on the grounds of sustainability and efficiency. Solar panels and fuel cells produce DC electricity; the inverters which turn it into grid-worthy AC inevitably lose some of that electricity in the process. Besides, many of the energy consuming devices we use - such as computers and LEDs – run on DC, too. That’s why you have a big box in between your laptop and the wall outlet. A DC power source would obviate the need for the box, and all the waste heat that it generates.
One group pushing for DC is called the EMerge Alliance. Their goal is to create standards that will give building designers the chance to put low voltage, DC power supplies in their buildings. They like the idea of designing buildings with, say, rooftop solar panels generating DC electricity that can be used directly to power the building’s LED lighting or its system of energy monitors. That kind of setup saves money on the solar installation (because it doesn’t require inverters and connects more smoothly to the grid), eases the installation of the lighting systems themselves, and makes the overall power consumption more efficient.
Via Greentech Media

written by Yoshi, December 03, 2008
written by HankS, December 03, 2008
Still a cool concept though.
written by metis, December 03, 2008
the reason ac won out in the current war was safety, voltage drop, and transmission range. low voltage DC is great for some lighting, but not as useful for many other things. you can't send DC more than a few miles w/o a sub station, and it's a lot more dangerous to send over distance
use stock 12v DC for built in lighting with LED and MR16s, doorbells, and home control, and convert to AC for table lamps, and other appliances, sell back to the grid on AC. you'll get the efficiency gains but still be able to deal with higher power consumption appliances (hair dryer, microwave, washer, computers) and sell back to the grid in a useful fashion.
ac is a must to have a grid, and a significant ammount of appliances will need to run on it, so the standard there is a good thing to keep around.
written by Patrick, December 03, 2008
written by EV, December 03, 2008
In house solar:
Generated Voltage DC converted to in house DC.
No matter what, the generated voltage will need to be 'conditioned' or 'complimented with outside power'. The panels won't generate exactly what you want in house in all likelihood.
Outside DC:
Say you turned the grid to DC. What Metis says is mostly true. However, today we can also perform DC/DC conversion. The grid could be made of a DC backbone so it would be DC-DC-DC. Still two conversions and it would most likely be less efficient than AC-AC-AC-DC. Those grid AC transformers are something like 99% efficient. Ac-DC are generally 87-92%.
written by mikeDC, December 04, 2008
If an air conditioner pulls a few amps, there is a surprising amount of energy lost just from the tiny resistance of the DC power wire within the home. I have not done all the math but it could negate the power savings from removing inverters and regulators and such.
The grid should definitely stay AC. DC is really only a good option for local supply (i.e. within a home)
written by Rafael, December 05, 2008
making everything DC would necessitate huge size wiring for simple household electronics, don't mention the fridge, computer, plasma tv, PS3 etc.
forget conversion losses, the real killer (besides DC safety concerns) is wire resistance. there isn't enough copper in the world to feed American homes in DC.
written by mark, December 05, 2008
The nice thing about AC is that you can (reasonably) efficiently convert voltage to avoid transmission losses - that's why we can string 11,000 Volt power lines from the power station into neighbourhoods. All the methods of converting DC voltages require power regulators that have a limited current capability, and get very expensive at high power levels.
written by Stephen C, December 14, 2008
written by Paul, December 16, 2008
Reading some of the comments I believe they are technically incorrect about DC. The main advantage to AC and the reason why it was used in the past is the ease with which it can be stepped up to higher and down to lower voltages, this aids in transmission and distribution. DC can be transmitted more effectively than AC as their are no losses associated with AC such as the skin effect. The problem with DC is that large solid state switching is required to transform the voltages but this is no longer a problem for modern power equipment and many DC transmission systems are in use today - There's one major 300MW Approx. DC transmission system not far from me which spans at least 100km.
written by Les Pace, December 17, 2008
yet Tesla's work has a place in todays world.
written by Rohanjcp, December 22, 2008
The problem is I don't know anything about DC usage except to make sure to use 12V for 12V appliances etc. Is there anywhere that I can learn more about the basics of hooking up my appliances? As soon as I get this straightened out, I will buy 12V DC appliances such as water hearter and AA battery chargers.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thank you!
Rohan
written by Conrad Pafford, January 23, 2009
It would not be very wise to attempt to run an electric water heater that heats to 140 degrees with solar or wind. It is possible (but expensive). I would use the suns rays directly! Look up batch solar water heater. I am having issues myself finding dc converter instructions to create my own. Can't really afford 200 dollars on a radio shack laptop converter. I will use the ac inverter that I have sparingly. Current(amps) is the enemy of low voltage. Current requires large wires(due to heat) Simple equation Volts*Amps=Watts. Hope this helps. Conrad
written by Conrad Pafford, January 23, 2009
written by Uncle B, February 05, 2009
written by obso, February 07, 2009
written by Justin Larson, February 07, 2009
written by TAEdison, February 21, 2009
written by R@SCE, March 03, 2009
Also, does anyone understand that a low voltage +12V DC circuit (What PC's run on) would require substantially heavy gauge or multiple runs of conductors in order to deliver a useful amount of power to a load device?
Consider a typical pc power supply: 300Watts
Consider amps at 12V: 25A
Consider an office with 10 PC's
The amps then are: 250A
This would require 4/0A or 2/0C conductor (Very Large)
Consider first the carbon footprint/environmental impact of the mining of copper or aluminum and production of your cable. I'm sure you will find it more beneficial to use the 120/240Vrms to +12V DC power supply in each computer, despite the marginal losses.
written by detour, August 07, 2009
written by seamless steel pipe, November 17, 2009
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Recent Comment
Share
Why not straight to DC?
It's a good opportunity to cut out middlemen, especially when you're effectively doing a round-trip conversion.