Recent Comment
Share
When electricity flows at a trickle pace, it’s not very useful for a lot of our high-power applications. That’s why, as we all know, finding a way to store that energy so that it can build up slowly over time is critically important.
One way to store that trickle is to run a chemical reaction that will leave us with some combustible fuel. For example, scientists are working on catalysts that will make it easier to split water into O2 and H2 – the latter being combustible hydrogen - using electricity derived from photovoltaic power.
In the same vein, scientists recently developed a process called electromethanogensis. If you break down the name, you see that the process involves generating methane (natural gas) from electricity. How does this happen? The answer lies in a species of bacteria known as Methanobacterium palustre (see the word “methane” in there?), which is able to chemically reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) into methane (CH4).
The bacteria is used as part of an electrolytic cell. An electrolytic cell is the opposite of a battery – a battery takes two compounds that want to react with each other and taps that potential in the form of electricity. In an electrolytic cell, the electrons are pumped in and they drive the reaction uphill, so to speak. In this case that uphill reaction is CO2 turning into CH4 (the opposite of the downhill version, which happens when we burn CH4, or any other fossil fuel). The bacteria’s job is to catalyze the process, which means that you get a lot more natural gas for the same amount of electricity fed in.
What’s interesting is that the scientist primarily involved, Dr. Bruce Logan of Penn State University, has also used bacteria for the opposite process – microbial fuel cells (in fact he wrote a book on the subject). In that process, bacteria are harnessed to eat nasty molecules from sources such as municipal waste pools, break them down and release electric energy as a byproduct.
This is the kind of thing that makes biological-based energy sources so intriguing. In reality, bio-energy makes up a tiny fraction of all renewable energy out there, and some suggest that it will always be that way. But in principle, bio-energy holds so much potential that it’s hard to say where the technology will be in 10 years from now. We’ve been tweaking microbes to make drugs and natural products for a while, but we’ve only begun thinking about incorporating them into the energy infrastructure, be it in methane synthesis such as this, bio-diesel production or algae fuel.
Via Green Car Congress
Image via Penn State
Subscribe to this comment's feed
written by Uncle B, March 31, 2009
-
- +0
-
-
written by Tim, March 31, 2009
Very cool, nonetheless!
-
- +0
-
-
written by Murphy, March 31, 2009
Suff like this could be used in things like offshore wind farms, and remote locations, so rather than trying to tie renewable energy directly into the grid, you use renewable energy to create useful 0 emission fuel.
Alot of fans of renenewable energy seem to focus on efficeny but tend to gloss over the reliablity issues inherent in green power sources (you cannot make the wind blow when you want), when in reality reliability often trumps efficency in modern grid design. Generating fuel from renewables creates a buffer allowing greater renewable capacity without hurting reliability. I've always imagined a grid where renewables and excess grid capacity were used to create fuels that can be used to operate / offset the base grid power that is now largley powered by coal.
-
- +1
-
-
written by wow gold, April 01, 2009
CO2 + 2H2O + Energy → CH4 + 2O2
So we store energy in methane for later use but where would we get this energy? Solar? Wind? It looks to me that its kinda useless if the energy source emits GHGs.
In combustion:
CH4 + 2O2 → CO2 + 2H2O + Energy
So the C02 input is the same as the C02 output after the entire process which to me looks like it has a carbon footprint of zero. Of course assuming 100% efficiency.
The advantage I see is that energy in the form of methane is transportable and can be stored unlike solar and wind. Lets just make sure the methane is properly contained and there is full combustion when using it because methane traps 20 times more heat heat than CO2.
-
- +0
-
-
written by KR, April 02, 2009
I am very much keen to know more about "Methanobacterium palustre" It is a bacteria. but when it was discovered and how?? Because people were not aware of this. and i am also agree that where did that bacteria is getting energy to convert or is there any other type chemical is coming out from that formation??
Thank you for the information. I am looking forward for ur rply. And i came across this blog through Toostep
-
- +0
-
-
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Be interesting to have an idea of the energy input required.