Large scale LEED projects sometimes install massive systems to treat and re-use
greywater (water from sinks that has been used for washing, as opposed to
sewage waste, which is termed black water) for flushing toilets. Now, you can do the same thing in your very own home!The Aqus system collects the water from a bathroom sink and filters and disinfects it before it gets re-used as flush water for an adjacent toilet. (There is nothing that would prevent this from being used in a large-scale LEED project either.)
"Our system is expected to save between 10 and 20 gallons of fresh water per day for two person bathrooms with normal activities. This represents between 3,650 and 7,300 gallons of fresh water saved per year. An equal amount of wastewater cost is also saved." This would mean an annual savings of $40.88 to $81.76 (based on an average rate of $5.60 per 1,000 gallons) from using a device like this.
The Aqus system can be retrofitted to an existing toilet without great difficulty (the company likens it to the difficulty of installing a new toilet and/or an over-the-stove microwave oven). It can be connected to a standard 1.6 gallon two-piece toilet.
via: Architectural Products magazine

written by mind, July 22, 2007
written by Rick Stammer, July 22, 2007
Thanks.
written by Sam, July 22, 2007
10 gallons * 365 days = 3650 gallons
20 gallons * 365 days = 7300 gallons
Correct there; assuming $5.60 per 1,000 gallons
3.65 * $5.60 = $20.44
7.30 * $5.60 = $40.88
Allow for 'an equal amount of wastewater savings'
$20.44 * 2 = $40.88
$40.88 * 2 = $81.76
Sure, it's spurious accuracy, but I don't think the idea that you would save $40-80 per year is at all unreasonable.
I could see this being actually a really economic cost saving device for sale in some areas where water prices are very high. For example islands - certainly here in the UK the Isle of Wight has water prices many times that anywhere else in the country due to the inevitable extreme shortages that occur on a small heavily populated island largely made of permable chalk. Cost savings there would be a lot higher than $40-80, despite the fact that waste water is usually charged flat-rate to households in the UK.
written by Mimsey, July 22, 2007
written by earl greywater, July 22, 2007
1. water-conserving 5 minute shower is 13 gallons
2. toilet flush is 1.6 gallons (or more - see link below), so let's say 5 flushes per day per person, or 16 gallons per person per day.
3. bathroom sink uses 1-2 gallons per minute. Say 3 uses per person per day, or 4 gallons.
It seems obvious that the real match for the toilet is shower graywater, not sink graywater.
See http://www.inspect-ny.com/septic/wateruse.htm
written by Yeah, July 23, 2007
uhh... only if you leave it on full blast it might produce that much. ...also spraying water all over your shirt. I dunno about you but I rarely wash my hands after a #1, I know how to handle it. Even if, someone probably doesn't have the water on for more than 15 seconds. Sooo... that's NOTHING. Would be better off storing water from the shower.
written by Thursday, July 23, 2007
written by Tim, July 23, 2007
2. What Happens if There is Too Little Water Going Down the Bathroom Sink?
A. ...When the vanity tank is empty, the normal flesh water valve is opened and the toilet fill cycle is completed with fresh water. The system always uses the vanity tank’s reused water first then supplements it with fresh water.
Not a rigorous solution for water conservation but it seems easy to install and use and would be a great way to start conserving
written by James, July 23, 2007
And with regard to the volumes mentioned above this one uses only 4.5 litres (about 1 gal) for full flush & 3 litres for half flush
written by Josh, July 23, 2007
written by Josh, July 23, 2007
written by Joseph E. Davis, July 23, 2007
written by Steve Louis, July 23, 2007
Your ignorance in regard to water is terrifying! You must be American. It is well known throughout most of the world that water scarcity is one of the biggest threats facing humankind (even in the good 'ol US of A)! You would do well to inform yourself about how little of the world's water is fresh (i.e. drinkable), how polluted that bit is, and what has to be done to treat it.
written by jim, July 23, 2007
The problem is not whether it's a closed or open system but that the natural hydrological cycle is being disrupted by industrial activities, i.e. logging and intensive agriculture which leaches the soil of nutrients past points of replenishment and causes desertification (less food for all of us) and reduced runoff and water going into aquifers (depletion past break-even points, causing scarcity) as well as human water use that renders that water unusable for humans (pumping fresh water that is otherwise used for drinking into oil wells to keep oil pressure high, or using it in high-tech manufacturing -- the fresh water in those activities is thereafter NOT SUITABLE FOR HUMAN USE)
IT sounds crazy, but do some more research on the basic science and you will recognize that human industrial activity is actually REDUCING the TOTAL amount of fresh water available in the world more rapidly than the natural cleaning and replenishment systems can replace it. Combine this with the population explosion and privatization of fresh water and you have a recipe for disaster. And if you think you are safe because you live in the 1st world Western democracy think again buddy, when was the last year the Rio Grande river reached the ocean?
written by Barnaby, July 23, 2007
written by had3z, July 23, 2007
and there is no mention about the costs of filters or other products that disinfect the grey water.
written by sgvprelude, July 24, 2007
We should just pump salt water from the ocean to flush our toilets, that's where it all ends up anyways.
written by Stephen Rees, July 24, 2007
written by Rich Lather, July 24, 2007
I would think the water from doing clothes would be a bit cleaner and would really only need a screen rather than a disposable filter. With the sink thing, you've really only exchanged fresh water for oil in the form of plastic and transportation (from China?) of the filter.
I've thought about the fresh-water flush problem in the past.
written by NJ, July 24, 2007
written by Joe, July 24, 2007
written by a little kid, July 25, 2007
written by Herno, July 25, 2007
written by Tim, July 26, 2007
Ladies, practice peeing standing up while showering. Then one day you'll have the skills to pee in the sink too! Amuse the neighbors! Impress your boss! Baffle the dog!
written by jeremy, July 26, 2007
written by nhut, July 26, 2007
written by Thursday, July 31, 2007
I use a composting toilet, but I'm on a farm and we can. Not sure how possible that would be for city folk! ;)
written by Rich, July 31, 2007
written by Bob, August 05, 2007
It does not have to be a trauma. As soon as you understand that you are not using water from the toilet tank, but instead are saving water by letting sink basin water work twice by operating the toilet, the picture seems so much rosier.
For those who want to wash their hands in warm or hot water, why not do what I did: mount your hot and cold water on the wall above the toilet top wash basin, and flowing directly into that basin. Why, I even have a mirror on the wall for shaving and - can even wash my face and brush my teeth - just like a real sink! All that water then flows directly into the toilet tank and later is used again to flush the toilet - great, no?!
You save space, save water, and can have a toilet space separate from your bathing area – providing privacy and making more efficient use of your bathroom facilities, which I find superbly civilized.
written by madwoman, August 07, 2007
NB please don't pee in my sink. Or in my flush tank. Yuk.
written by marilyn, August 08, 2007
written by icefish, August 08, 2007
written by Hyrum, August 12, 2007
written by Free Viagra, August 26, 2007
written by Lisa, October 22, 2007
I live in an apartment and can't make installations, but I have a Little Giant pump that I use to pump shower water into 5 gal buckets for the toilet and wash. Not a hard change!
written by Flo, November 22, 2007
written by Jane, November 23, 2007
written by Fault, November 24, 2007
This system is designed to retrofit old systems, thus saving a lot of the resources required to install an entirely new (though much improved) plumbing system. Bravo.
written by Water Filters, November 27, 2007
The Aquasana Combo-Pack combines 2 of the most unique and beneficial products available anywhere into a value added package with added savings.
You get the #1 rated AQ-4000 Dual-Filter Countertop Drinking Water System complete with filter cartridges and all required faucet connections, documented to be the highest rated home water filtration system in America... for both performance & value!
written by Mike, January 19, 2008
written by Josef, April 13, 2008
Thanks. Josef
written by Poor Richard, April 16, 2008
1. Using shower or sink water to flush toilets is a good idea but for much less money / hassle - you can reduce toilet water consumption by filling a half gallon or 2 liter jug with water (or sand) and putting in the flush tank. You might have to flush twice after a serious "load" but it saves a lot of water. You could similarly use small rocks or something else to displace the water volume in the flush tank. No need to send a fully functional toilet to the local landfill when you can easily modify its operation.
2. Our environment and many sanitary sewer systems ARE indeed closed systems. Saying that drinkable water is finite is ludicrous. It's all a matter of priorities and costs. We know how to turn salt water to drinking water and we know how to treat wastewater (black & grey) to make it cleaner than the most pristine mountain stream.
3. The people trying to scare you about the lack of drinking water are the same jerkoffs trying to scare you about man-made climate change. It's a bunch of nonsense.
4. Atlanta has problems because they aren't (yet) treating their waste water and putting it back in the rivers (upstream of the tap). They'll hopefully figure it out soon.
5. Widespread ignorance is a more frightening epidemic than any environmental concerns we might have.
Poor Richard
written by Darwin Finch, July 11, 2008
written by Bonnie, August 01, 2008
written by Terri, October 20, 2008
written by sarah, January 05, 2009
written by Lisa, January 26, 2009
written by Ula, April 22, 2009
written by Maureen Webb, May 04, 2009
Sea water would cause havoc at the sewage treatment works as the levels of salt in the water would kill the bacteria needed for treating the sewage. This is why the discharge from water softeners cannot be discharge into sewage treatment plants.
http://www.wte-ltd.co.uk
written by sewage treatment plants, May 04, 2009
written by Uncle B, May 06, 2009
written by Jim Morrison, August 12, 2009
Another green alternative to conventional toilet pissing is salad dressing. Most of the time, no one will even know.
Recycle your yellow;
Go Green!
written by Gol D, September 18, 2009
written by Yosef, September 24, 2009
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Recent Comment
Share
You might be interested in Pee-cycling ... and a more sustainable life ... (http://www.energyconversation.org/cms/node/393)