
LEDs are by far more efficient than incandescents and even CFLs while being used as a light source, but what about over their entire life cycle? Until a recent study, there had been doubts that the technology could claim the title of "most efficient" once you factored in production.
A new study conducted by Siemens Corporate Technology Centre for Eco Innovations and released by lighting company Osram claims to put those doubts to rest. The study compared the life cycle energy use of one 25,000-hour LED lamp to that of 2.5 10,000-hour CFLs and 25 1,000-hour incandescents.
The report states that the energy needed to make, ship, install, use and then recycle LEDs was about equal to CFLs and much less than incandescents. While the report didn't go into the technical details of the study or release specific numbers, Osram says it will release all of that information in the fall with support by three independent analysts.
via Bits

written by extole, August 04, 2009
written by Bob Wallace, August 04, 2009
I'd like to buy a couple of LED lamps for my most frequently used spots. But I can't see spending that much money up front for about a 50% 'right now' power savings.
Lighting just doesn't eat that much of my energy budget, $70 for the equivalent of a $0.50 CFL would burn my wallet. Leaving that other $69.50 working makes more sense to me.
Additionally, there is no appreciable installation cost for me. Changing a light bulb 2.5x as often over a long number of years just doesn't bother me. I could use the exercise.
written by Barney Sperlin, August 05, 2009
written by Bob Wallace, August 05, 2009
And it doesn't get released unless the bulb is broken.
I wouldn't be surprised if the mercury released by those few broken CFLs was quite a bit less than the mercury that would have been released by burning coal to power the incandescents they replaced.
Just learn how to clean up if you do break one, find out where to recycle them once they burn out, and keep your eyes open for LEDs to come down in price (eventually).
written by EV, August 05, 2009
Re:Bob Wallace
Barney - CFLs have very little mercury in them, less than 1/100th of what a mercury thermometer contains.
That would be difficult as thermometers haven't used mercury for years.
I wouldn't be surprised if the mercury released by those few broken CFLs was quite a bit less than the mercury that would have been released by burning coal to power the incandescents they replaced.
This is correct, provided that all, or a significant percentage, of the power come from Coal.
written by Haflidi Eirikur Gudmundsson, August 05, 2009
written by Jacob Wilson, August 05, 2009
We're about to have 3 floors in our facility changed out from fluorescent tubes to LED tubes. After doing a lot of research, we discovered that there are a lot of unreliable products out there skewing perception of LED performance. Just be sure to compare and select only UL listed, Energy Star compliant, 100% recyclable lamps & fixtures that contain no lead or mercury, & generate no UV light, infrared radiation or CO2 emissions.
You might want to check out www.novicomm.com, they seem to be leading the technology right now.
written by Kat M, August 05, 2009
And of course there's always the question of "do recycling facilities exist?" (I don't know the answer to this question) when you're looking at life-cycle analysis. You can't just say "which is more efficient to recycle" if there's only one or two places in the country that recycle them.
written by Bob Wallace, August 05, 2009
Jacob - LEDs make economic sense when there is a high cost for bulb replacement. It can cost as much to send a crew out with a truck and cherry picker to change a street light as a long lasting LED would cost.
California has (I believe) completed switching all its traffic signals/stop lights to LED clusters.
A nice feature of these new lights is that each red/amber/green light is made up of several LEDs. If one fails the light is still fine. It would take lots of failures before functionality is lost.
That same "additional value" just doesn't exist in the floor lamp next to my chair....
written by Lyon, August 05, 2009
written by MD, August 05, 2009
Gallium
BTW - Flue dusts from burning coal may contain as much as 1.5% gallium.
Oh and they mix it with another material... Arsenic !
Oh lovely arsenic...
6 of one, half dozen of another
Instead of screwing things up mining for coal, the mining companies will go full force into mining for gallium and arsenic...
... but hey, "It's Green"
written by Bob Wallace, August 05, 2009
Wikipedia can be your friend....
written by Bob Wallace, August 06, 2009
They have LEDs that would give one the equivalent light of a 100 watt incandescent/18 watt CFL that will operate on 110 volts? And screw in standard US sockets?
If so, how much? And shipping?
written by Oakleigh Solargroupies, August 07, 2009
written by sue, August 11, 2009
In checking with the Oakland Public Utilities this year
on how many traffic lites had been converted in our fair city, the answer was about 70%( if I am remembering correctly--data not with me at the moment) as of March '09 .. so I am curious what your source info is on #'s of LED traffic lites in all of CA
written by jimskyguy, August 12, 2009
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
AUG 04
"I have been working with LED's for about 1 1/2 years now and have been..."
View all Comments