For those of you who don't know, there's a company out there that's attracted the interest of venerable venture capitalists, established corporations, politicians, and even a few bloggers with claims that seem nearly impossible. Now, this isn't Steorn, it's not free energy. What they're talking about is possible without re-writing the laws of physics. But what they say they can do would change things. A lot of things.
EEStor says that they are working on an "electrical energy storage unit" (EESU - explained in more detail here, if you're curious) that would hold ten times the amount of power as todays most advanced batteries at the same weight. This  storage unit would be able to charge and recharge infinitely without any loss of capacity and charging time (with enough power) could be brought down to three or four minutes. The storage units can be infinitely stacked together for applications as small as watch batteries and as large as grid-level power storage. And, of course, the technology is 10 times cheaper than lithium ion batteries. In short. it all sounds too good to be true.
I wouldn't even be wrting about this if EEStor didn't have investments from very smart people and contracts with very large companies. But that doesn't mean I'm not still skeptical. Smart people have been duped before. But because EEStor has been in the news an awful lot, and their strategic partner ZENN Motors says that they will be putting these devices into cars by early next year, let's try and figure out what this would mean for the world.
- Electric cars, of course, would become much more practical. While the EESU wouldn't be able to charge in 5 minutes at home with a 220 volt plug, it could charge in five minutes at high-power charging stations. This infrastructure would have to be built however, and the technology isn't cheap. Just like hydrogen or ethanol or Better Place's battery swapping stations, EESU's would require new infrastructure. The only electric vehicles that do not require new infrastructure are cars designed not to travel out of the city and cars with on-board, gas-powered generators like the Volt.
- ZENN Motor company currently has exclusive rights to put EESU's in four-wheeled vehicles that weigh less than 3,000 lbs. ZENN will likely sell those rights fairly quickly if the EESU pans out. If they don't, we'll be stuck with lithium ion for a while anyway.
- However, companies working on next-generation batteries for electric vehicles, including A123, LG Chem, GM, Tesla, Toyota and many more, will find themselves with a lot of useless research on their hands. Lithium ion batteries will never hit the numbers EEStor has claimed for it's EESU.
- Battery swapping technology may or may not become completely obsolete. Project Better Place's system of swapping out batteries to reduce the need for charging batteries could be used for EESU's instead of batteries. However, it's difficult for me to imagine that high-power quick-charging infrastructure wouldn't be far cheaper than battery-swapping facilities.
- Renewable energy sources would become much more viable. Currently, options for storing power generated during windy or sunny times of the day are limited and inefficient. An EEStor grid-level battery could store power for use at other times during the day at a comparatively low cost.
- The world might actually see a significant reduction in carbon dioxide emissions because of the EESU.
Let's remember, there are a lot of "if"s here. EEStor's technology could be viable, but costs could rise, imperfections could be found. It's very possible that the EESU will hit the market and lithium ion batteries will remain competitive with the new technology. Time will tell...I'm looking forward to it.

written by EV, September 07, 2009
written by BruceMcF, September 07, 2009
written by "EEshock", September 08, 2009
written by the truth, September 08, 2009
written by Matthew Peffly, September 08, 2009
- It is true "most" improvements in technology are incurmental, except when they are not.
Time will tell
written by Kevin, September 08, 2009
http://gm-volt.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2999
If you take the time to read through that whole list of quotes, and read the articles from which they are culled, I think it's pretty difficult to put a positive spin on this story.
written by Drew, September 08, 2009
written by B, September 09, 2009
written by Tom Lakosh, September 10, 2009
If ZENN is actually seeking DOE funding, they will have to demonstrate the EESU functionality and we'll know in a hurry whether it's a dud and they get squat or Secy Chu hands them a $1 billion check, and it's really one or the other given their claims.
written by Ross Plecash, September 10, 2009
written by Chas Martin, September 10, 2009
Let's see it in action. But, remember, the EV1 worked, but was killed for other reasons....
written by C.J., September 10, 2009
written by Eric, September 11, 2009
written by C.J., September 11, 2009
written by hyperspaced, September 12, 2009
written by MikeChase, September 16, 2009
Today we cant image life with out it.. same Space Travel.
I think its about time for this new revolution.
Just don't be held back by a old belief structure..
written by BrianS, September 16, 2009
I hope it pans out better than c.f., but I'll wait to get excited when I actually see it out and working.
written by Ormond Otvos, September 17, 2009
Every day sciencedaily and physorg put out twenty or thirty geewhiz articles that detail advances in nanomaterials, biology, and materials science.
Where's the big surprise. So they make capacitors with thinner films of higher capacity to hold charge and stack up 32 thousand layers and stick 5000v on them. Ever worked with a television CRT? Seems like 30kv was no big deal then. My scooter has a 40kv spark coil with zillions of turns of very fine wire. Impossible, you say?
I will buy a Zenn as soon as it has the 100 mile capacity these capacitors will give it.
written by C.J., September 17, 2009
written by Desertstraw, September 19, 2009
Why Eester has given Zenn so much in exchange for a paltry investment.
How the production facility can be kept so secret. If Eestor has anything like what is claimed they are a major threat to billion dollar companies. Surely, they would hire the best investigators to determine what is really going on and some of this information would be leaked.
written by Doc Rings, October 08, 2009
The invited scientists get a chance to chat with the patent holder/inventor on his quantum battery. Puts EEstor's claims to shame, even...
http://www.theeestory.com/topics/1103
Quantum Battery homepage:
http://quantumbattery.ch/drupal-6.13/
Cheers, but stay skeptical,
Doc
written by eelogical, July 05, 2011
FACTS:
EESTor never demonstrated basic proof of concept. EESTor never had a functional EESU which met the patent specs.
EESTor Saga is finished! Read the Air Force Research Lab emails obtained through the Freedom of Information Act,
http://www.greentechmedia.com/...ad/eestor/
You will understand there was and still is an orchestrated campaign to pump EESTor by an EESTor News Blogger Mr. Murphy and his followers.
This best describes the EESCAM story:
"EEStor is nothing more than a vehicle for a Canadian pump-n-dump, specifically Zenn Motors. Zenn has a powerful Canadian hype team supported by a crooked bucket shop (Paradigm Capital), paid promoters and degenerate gamblers. Experts in the field of EEStor’s technology do not believe the claims in their product... The trade here is to short Zenn on all pops from here forward." credit Steve Pluvia
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
SEP 07
"Has anyone witnessed a functional EESU which met the patent specs? It'..."
View all Comments