
A perfect way of storing electricity generated by wind turbines has been elusive so far. Ideas like super-sized batteries, compressed air and hydroelectric storage have all been floated. One company though thinks the answer could be as simple as making ice.
Calmac has come up with a storage system called IceBank that uses the energy generated at off-peak night-time hours to make ice. That stored ice is then used for cooling purposes during high-demand daytime hours. The company claims that reducing electricity demand for cooling can cut energy costs by 20 - 40 percent. That reduction also means fewer emissions from power plants.
This a great solution for harnessing wind power that might otherwise go to waste during night-time hours. And it's pretty low-tech - no need for lithium or rare earth minerals - just a souped up ice maker.
via Treehugger

written by Shane, November 21, 2009
written by Benjamin, November 21, 2009
written by Paul T, November 21, 2009
written by Carl Hage, November 21, 2009
Where I live, the difference in retail price between peak daytime and nighttime electricity is $.30/kWh (.41 summer-peak .11 off peak) with time-of-day billing. (And you wonder why Bakersfield was upset when smart-meters were installed with switch to TOD billing.) So 1m3 of water could store $28 per day of cooling energy!
Besides building air, the concept could be applied to other cooling, e.g. grocery store refrigerators. An ice tank inside could freeze water overnight so power can be shut off during peak use times.
The thermal energy and refrigerator heat-pump electricity aren't directly comparable, but the heat pump also doesn't need to work as hard with cooler nighttime temperatures.
written by brad crockett, November 21, 2009
written by Sealy Castrato, November 22, 2009
yours truly Sealy Castrato
written by Jim, November 22, 2009
Danger of global cooling? You're joking I hope. Making ice involves moving the heat out of the ice chamber. It doesn't involve destroying heat.
The only potential risk of global cooling by this method is if burning fossil fuels is what's staving off the next ice age.
written by Moderngreenollie, November 22, 2009
Nice idea. Agree with the problem that ice isn't always needed, but at the same time, isn't conduction of electricity more effective when the conductors are cooled? So if it were kept at the generator it would also have that benefit, even if not needed elsewhere?
written by Richard, November 23, 2009
Here's an off-set idea. How about putting all the ice in the polar ice caps. That might help stop the ice-thinning.
written by VeruTEK Green Technologies, November 23, 2009
written by Joes, November 23, 2009
written by Jeff, November 23, 2009
It's a good, common-sense idea... but it's just nothing new.
Here are the locations of a couple facilities in Chicago if you want to map it and see aerial photos.
137 S State St, Chicago, IL 60603
448 S Franklin St, Chicago, IL 60607
written by Androo, November 23, 2009
Electricity in the grid may be the most useful form for our generation capacity, but it's only useful because it's flexible - if you can't use that electricity to do anything (i.e. if there's no demand), then it's more useful to do something with it than to waste it. Hence, producing ice, heating molten salts, compressing air, charging PHEVs...all ways of storing energy.
Industrial waste heat is only a usable resource for industry. Pumping water for cooling requires electricity (another medium of electrical storage, if you have sufficient infrastructure). Industrial scale flywheel storage would be extremely expensive, not trivially complicated, and has to deal with mechanical efficiency losses as well as electrical ones. It's certainly no magic bullet, which is why you haven't seen it implemented on a significant scale.
written by Jessy, December 21, 2009
written by Dankoozy, December 28, 2009
written by BruceMcF, January 17, 2010
written by McDaver, February 03, 2010
Also, I don't know where the idea was promulgated that "the wind blows harder at night".
Baloney.
It depends on where you are and what your localized weather patterns are, but usually the subtraction of the sun's energy from the equation results in less kinetic energy, not more.
Every fisherman knows that the wind usually dies down in the evening and is usually calm in the early morning, but will generally pick up as the day progresses. It's not always true everywhere, but I think it it is usually true in a generalized way. Certainly not the opposite, as was suggested.
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
NOV 20
"This is a nice idea in fanatasy, and may be workeable for a pew people..."
View all Comments