Priligy online now, save money

FEB 20

Recent Comment

"Great idea! But how much CO2 can you actually collect. It would be gre..."

View all Comments

DOE Wants To Put CO2 Underground



The Department of we use it cheap levitra without prescription Energy has made it clear that they will try to make carbon sequestration work, and they recently put out a Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) to help them do it. The FOA states that up to $24 million will be set aside for projects that will test out different ways of sequestering carbon in “geological formations” – i.e. underground or underwater. The people who are granted the awards will get about 80% of the costs covered by the DOE.

There are various aspects that need to be investigated. First of all, carbon dioxide can be sequestered in different places. Some suggest pumping it into empty mines and order usa levitra online natural gas wells, others promote the cialis without prescription idea of storing it deeper under the Earth’s crust itself, and yet others advocate dissolving it into deep parts of the ocean. We don’t really know which one will be most effective and risk-free.

Besides figuring out the big picture, there are also details that need to be worked out, like establishing standards and protocols for measuring how much carbon dioxide is stored in a given system, how much leaks out, etc. And scientists also need to agree on www.omroepgroesbeek.nl a way to model these systems and predict how they will behave. Because we want to be pretty darn sure that the gas we pump underground stays there and doesn’t burst out like a colossal champagne bottle.

In other words, this is a big step for carbon sequestration in America – we’ve progressed from just talking about it all the time to we recommend buy viagra overnight actually challenging people to make it work.

Carbon sequestration is a funny thing. Dealing with greenhouse gas emissions by diverting them into the ground seems a lot more like treating the symptoms rather than the www.privateeryachts.com cause of our national energy disease. It’s not – to quote an overused and poorly defined word – “sustainable”. Still, the realists out there will remind me that attempting to curb global warming without it is buy generic levitra in usa impossible. In a perfect world, carbon sequestration represents an imperfect, but necessary transition technology. So let’s make that transition smooth, quick and successful.

Via Green Car Congress
Image via climatetechnology.gov

Hits: 11822
Comments (11)Add Comment
0
...
written by MD, February 20, 2009
Anyone looking into making sodium bicarbonate from CO2 and then dumping the "baking soda" into used oil wells?

Check out the Solvay process.
0
We MUST do Everything
written by Eduardo, February 20, 2009
Even when the solution of sequestration is not the whole solution, I really think it must be carried on. Of course this should be done taking ALL considerations and express levitra delivery risks, not just blindly. For our environment, we should take all different solutions that work best in different areas, countries or economies. This said, NOT just ONE kind of generic levitra cheap solution should be taken and/or pushed to be taken by a country, state or city. But we have to make our best in our hands to NOT destroy our environment.
0
Building Materials
written by James Love, February 21, 2009
Someone needs to best cialis price find a cheap way to make building materials out of C02. That way you could sequester carbon and make something useful to sell.
0
"necessary transition technology" ?
written by Fred, February 21, 2009
You assume it's necessary. You believe it's necessary. You do not know that it is necessary.

Yes, it's good common sense that we tread lightly on the earth - in all ways - for our own health as well as the health and beauty of our surroundings.

But evidence is accumulating that the earth has been cooling for the past decade.

And the canadian healthcare pharmacy evidence for man-made global warming is far from certain. Far, far from certain.

And we have much more pressing problems to deal with, ones we actually can have a direct and immediate influence on.

For instance, 24 million dollars spent on getting Dean Kamen's water purifiers to villages that need them would go a long way toward helping prevent disease, increasing health and longevity and raising living standards for many thousands of the world's poorest, sickest people.

Maybe then they could plant trees instead of cutting them down for firewood? Wouldn't that sequester some CO2?
0
...
written by Luke, February 21, 2009
James Love,
Someone needs to find a cheap way to make building materials out of C02. That way you could sequester carbon and make something useful to sell.

I've thought about this for some time. After Googling around for some applicable chemistry, I looked out in my back yard and realized that the solution already exists -- it's called a "tree". :-)

Seriously, trees take up CO2 as they grow. If we keep them from rotting by building houses and furniture, the CO2 is sequestered. Or, in some cases, the CO2 from the wood can be stored underground with a process like biochar. It takes a little time and only today buy generic viagra from india space to make this so-called "tree" sequester carbon, and there are side-effects like shade and the creation of forest-floor, but that sounds pretty good to me.

The problems come in if we're logging virgin forests. But, as someone who spent most of my life in East coast states, and who recently moved to the Midwest, I don't think I've ever accidentally visited a virgin forest. There's a lot of try it discount generic cialis online forest around, but it's 2nd or 3rd growth. Just so long as we manage it responsibly -- and, having done a bit IT-related work with some US Forest Service people, it seems we've learned a lot about how to http://www.shoreacres.net/herbal-cialis do that well in the last couple of decades.

So, I present to you, the carbon sequestration technology that you desire: The Tree.
0
You are right on that...too.
written by Eduardo, February 22, 2009
Even when I said "We must do everything"... I still stand for what I´ve said BUT being terrifically agree with the statement made by my next commenter that the THREE is our best sequestration technology. That is the best and the first thing we should DO. Cut less and plant more threes. 5 stars for your statement.
0
maybe they should plant more trees?
written by Billybob, February 23, 2009
Maybe they should plant more trees? Just a thought.
0
CO2 Down Oil Wells Improves Recovery
written by Musson, February 23, 2009
Injecting CO2 into old oil wells could improve recovery.

Also, cutting down forests and using the cialis usa wood as building materials actually sequestors carbon. Replanting the trees removes carbon at a faster rate because new growth forests grow much more quickly than old growth forests.

You might not like the facts. But, they are the facts.
0
Here's where you can shove that
written by Delusid, February 27, 2009
Just send it to space
0
what about beer or C-fibers
written by Tack, March 06, 2009
what about increasing world beer production to keep co2 out of the enviroment. Or fiberize it to Carbon polmer construction material, this may be better and more rapid than sit and wait for a tree to grow. But, wait, I´ll go and the best site where to get viagra in canada plant an apple tree anyway.

With cheers ´n laughter
0
Building Material Suppliers
written by Building Material Suppliers, May 03, 2011
Great idea! But how much CO2 can you actually collect. It would be great if you could convert the CO2 into some kind of construction material, for example internal blocks for houses, which at one point were made out of flyash/coke.

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 

Are you an EcoGeek?

We've got to keep 7 billion people happy without destroying our planet. It's the biggest challenge we've ever faced....but we're taking it on. Are you with us?