Priligy online now, save money
Preventing Pollution

EPA Coal Decision Could Pave Way for Renewable Energy

A recent ruling by the EPA's Environmental Appeals Board could lead to a tougher time for coal power and an easier time for renewable energy. Last Thursday, the board blocked the EPA from issuing a permit to a coal plant addition in Utah and ruled that the agency needs to develop a nationwide standard for dealing with CO2.

This ruling is important because it puts over 100 proposed coal plants on hold while the EPA comes up with new CO2 guidelines. Coal plants will be considered riskier by investors because there's no telling what types of changes will have to be made for them to get the green light. This could convince investors to put their financing behind clean energy projects instead.

If the EPA comes up with even moderately strict CO2 limits, coal companies will have to spend more money on technology that reduces their emissions. This will make coal power more expensive and renewables like solar, wind and geothermal more competitive.

 

California's Future High Speed Rail

On November 4, Californians voted in favor of a new high speed rail system that will carry passengers the 800 miles from Sacramento to San Diego. Since, according to the High Speed Rail Authority, California is the 12th largest producer of greenhouse gases in the world and transportation accounts for 41 percent of those emissions, this news is very exciting.

The High Speed Rail Authority states that the trains will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 12 billion pounds a year, will create 450,000 jobs and will reduce dependence on foreign oil by 12.7 million barrels a year. The high speed trains will use 1/3 the energy of air travel and 1/5 the energy of car travel and construction is set for 2011.

Those opposed to the train are suspicious of the energy savings and fear that tax payers will pay more than has been estimated. But removing cars from the congested highways of California's cities and offering a quick and more environmentally-friendly alternative to flying can only bring positive change. Even if the results aren't as great as the estimates, California, and the planet, are ultimately going to benefit from this project. I can't wait until high speed trains come to more parts of the country.

via Inhabitat

 

Al Gore's Plan for Change

Al Gore has issued a lot of challenges to us in the last few years. In recent months, he's made speeches calling for us to go carbon neutral in 10 years. In September, he encouraged civil disobedience and just last Friday at the Web 2.0 Summit, he asked us to use the web to organize a social movement to save the planet (we're already on it, Al!).

But in yesterday's op-ed piece in The New York Times, his challenge was to just one person: President-elect Obama. He again called for clean electricity by 2018, but this time he presented a five-part plan, the cornerstone of which is a $400 billion federal investment in a smart grid. He notes that the way out of the climate crisis also carries a solution to the the economic crisis, citing how government funding of new infrastructure projects brought us out of the Great Depression.

Here are the five steps in Gore's plan:

  1. Large-scale investments in incentives for solar thermal plants in the Southwest, wind farms stretching from Texas to the Dakotas and advanced geothermal plants in known hot spots.
  2. $400 billion over 10 years for a unified national smart grid that would transport renewable energy from the rural areas where it's generated to the cities where it's needed. It should include smart features that would allow consumers to conserve electricity and reduce bills.
  3. Help the automobile industry (the large automakers and new start-ups) to convert to plug-in hybrids that utilize the smart grid.
  4. A nationwide initiative to retrofit buildings with better insulation and energy-efficient windows and lighting. He asks that the initiative be coupled with the proposal in Congress to help Americans with mortgages that are more expensive than the value of their homes.
  5. Put a price on carbon and lead world efforts to come up with a more effective replacement to the Kyoto treaty.

via NY Times

 

Rocks That Capture CO2

Often it turns out that nature is way ahead of us. Scientists at Columbia University discovered that a type of rock found in Oman, New Guinea, California and other places is able to capture vast quantities of CO2.

Peridotite rocks produce calcium carbonate and magnesium carbonate (both solids) when they come in contact with CO2. Researchers discovered that these rocks in the Omani desert naturally absorb 10,000 to 100,000 tons of CO2 a year.

While taking rocks to the CO2 would be expensive, CO2 could be brought to these rocks. Scientists believe that they could bore into the ground and inject water containing CO2. The CO2 would immediately produce calcium and magnesium carbonate and be permanently stored in the rock.

Successful tests have already been completed and the scientists want to try it on a larger scale. This type of CO2 capture seems more feasible and safer than many other options and it harnesses an already-occurring, natural process.

via CleanTechnica

Image via Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory

 

Alberta Oil Sands Called “Mordor”



One of Canada's most prominent environmentalists toured the oil sands in northern Alberta recently and had one word to express what she saw: Mordor. Maude Barlow, who was recently appointed to advise the UN on water issues, said her visit to the oil sands reminded her of Tolkien's fictional blackened and barren wasteland.

The oil sands deposits in Alberta are second only to Saudi Arabia’s reserves, but the toll of extracting the molasses-like viscous oil - across an area larger than the state of Florida - has been heavy.

“The air is foul, the water is being drained and poisoned,” said Barlow, who chairs the Council of Canadians. The Council wants a moratorium on any new oilsands development until more environmental assessments are done. However, a spokesman for one of the oil companies said that from the air, the sprawling plants don't give an accurate picture of the reclamation efforts made on the ground.

Either way, it seems that the slowing economy is slowing down these projects as well. Last Friday Royal Dutch Shell announced its that its new 100,000-barrel-per-day facility would be delayed.

Via the Vancouver Sun, Calgary Herald, and Canadian Press

Image via Greenpeace

 
Start   Prev   11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20   Next   End

Page 20 of 35

Are you an EcoGeek?

We've got to keep 7 billion people happy without destroying our planet. It's the biggest challenge we've ever faced....but we're taking it on. Are you with us?